Breaking the Silence

How Language Reinforces or Dismantles Stigma in Autism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/cjae.v6i1.6957

Keywords:

stigma in autism, autism, autistic identity, neurotypical bias, disability studies

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of language in shaping the attitudes society holds, reinforcing stigma, and influencing perceptions of Autistic people. The author argues that language is not just about the words used but a reflection of society’s biases, often perpetuating harmful narratives about autism. They emphasize the distinction between identity-first language (“Autistic people”) and person-first language (“individual with autism”), highlighting how the former affirms autism as an integral part of identity while the latter implies separateness or pathology. The use of identity-first language is framed as a reclamation of the Autistic narrative, challenging deficit-based perspectives historically shaped by non-Autistic voices. The paper writes about how stigma is rooted in deficit-based language. It perpetuates exclusion and lowers societal expectations, impacting access to education, employment, and meaningful inclusion. It critiques societal stereotypes of Autistic people as socially awkward, or lacking skills, and reframes these as differences in communication styles that are often undervalued due to neurotypical norms. The author calls for a shift in language to dismantle stigma, celebrate neurodiversity, and recognize the value of Autistic perspectives through advocating for respect, understanding, and societal change. Ultimately, they insist language is a powerful tool for acceptance and inclusion, urging society to embrace words that reflect the reality and worth of Autistic lives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bagatell, N. (2010). From cure to community: Transforming notions of autism. Ethos, 38(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2010.01077.x

Botha, M., Dibb, B., & Frost, D. M. (2020). Autism is me: An investigation of how autistic individuals make sense of autism and stigma. Disability & Society, 35(9), 1435–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1822782

Clarke, J., & van Amerom, G. (2008). Asperger's syndrome: Differences between parent’s understanding and those diagnosed. Social Science & Medicine, 66(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v46n03_05

Gernsbacher, M. A., Raimond, A. R., Balinghasay, M. T., & Boston, J. S. (2016). "Special needs" is an ineffective euphemism. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0025-4

Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E., & Hutman, T. (2013). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028353

Kenny, L., Hattersley, C., Molins, B., Buckley, C., Povey, C., & Pellicano, E. (2016). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism, 20(4), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315588200

Milton, D. E. M. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The “double empathy problem.” Disability & Society, 27(6), 883–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710008

Robertson, S. M. (2009). Neurodiversity, quality of life, and autistic adults: Shifting research and professional focuses onto real-life challenges. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v30i1.1069

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Kintzinger, R. (2026). Breaking the Silence: How Language Reinforces or Dismantles Stigma in Autism. Canadian Journal of Autism Equity, 6(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.15173/cjae.v6i1.6957