https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/issue/feed Global Labour Journal 2024-01-31T10:41:52+00:00 Claire Ceruti globallabour@mcmaster.ca Open Journal Systems <p style="font-size: 1.2em;" align="justify">The <em>Global Labour Journal</em> is an open-access, fully peer-reviewed online journal launched in January 2010. It is the official journal of the International Sociological Association’s Research Committee on Labour Movements (<a href="http://www.rc44labour.org/">RC44</a>) and is supported by the Center for Global Workers' Rights (<a href="https://la.psu.edu/ler/center-for-global-workers2019-rights#:~:text=The%20Center%20for%20Global%20Workers%27%20Rights%20focuses%20on,student%20projects%20on%20workers%27%20rights%2C%20among%20other%20things.">CGWR</a>) at Penn State University in State College, USA, and the Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care (<a href="https://www.supsi.ch/home_en/supsi/organizzazione/dipartimenti-scuole/deass">DEASS</a>) at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI) in Manno, Switzerland. It is co-hosted by the Global labour University (<a href="https://global-labour-university.org/">GLU</a>) and the Society, Work and Politics Institute (<a href="https://www.swop.org.za/">SWOP</a>) at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa.</p> <p style="font-size: 1.2em;" align="justify">The Journal serves as a forum to capture the plentiful and diverse scholarly work emerging on labour activities worldwide. It seeks to explore the role of globalisation in breaking down boundaries between the global/local and the public/private as they relate to labour activities.</p> <p style="font-size: 1.2em;" align="justify">Our aim is to provide a global forum for scholarly work on a comparative sociology of labour movements. Thus our intention is to understand, record and promote the transition of the labour movement into a new form of global unionism, and to highlight how labour activities are increasingly shaped by global forces.</p> <p style="font-size: 1.2em;" align="justify">Manuscripts may be <a title="Submissions" href="https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions" target="_blank" rel="noopener">submitted</a> via this website. Should you have any questions about the suitability of your manuscript for consideration in the Global Labour Journal, or any difficulty in submitting online, please do not hesitate to contact the <a title="GLJ Managing Editor" href="mailto:globallabour@mcmaster.ca" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GLJ Managing Editor</a>.</p> <p style="font-size: 1.2em;" align="justify">ISSN 1918-6711</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p style="font-size: 1.6em;"><strong><a href="https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/issue/current">CURRENT ISSUE: Vol. 15, No. 1 (2024)</a></strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p style="font-size: 1.2em;"><strong> </strong> <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>EDITORIAL TEAM</strong></span></p> <table width="690" cellpadding="16"> <tbody> <tr> <td style="vertical-align: top; width: 33%;"> <p><strong>Editors</strong></p> <p>Maurizio Atzeni Universidad Alberto Hurtado, and CEIL-CONICET<br />Chile and Argentina</p> <p>Elena Baglioni Queen Mary University of London United Kingdom</p> <p>Teri Caraway University of Minnesota United States</p> <p>Neethi P.<br />Indian Institute for Human Settlements<br />India</p> <p>Nicolas Pons-Vignon University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI) Switzerland</p> <p>Ben Scully<br />University of the Witwatersrand<br />South Africa</p> </td> <td style="vertical-align: top; width: 33%;"> <p><strong>Managing Editor</strong></p> <p>c/o Claire Ceruti<br />University of the Witwatersrand<br />South Africa</p> </td> <td style="vertical-align: top; width: 33%;"> <p><strong>Reviews Editor</strong></p> <p>Omar Manky Bonilla<br />Universidad del Pacífico, Peru</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Consulting Editor</strong></p> <p>Robert O'Brien<br />McMaster University<br />Canada</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5738 Human Being, Working Body, Working Day: An Introduction to Simone Weil’s “Rationalisation” 2024-01-31T09:37:47+00:00 William Tilleczek tilleczek@g.harvard.edu <p>Introduction to a translation of Simone Weil's text "Rationalisation"</p> 2024-01-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Global Labour Journal https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5739 Rationalisation 2024-01-31T09:44:34+00:00 William Tilleczek tilleczek@g.harvard.edu <p>The text translated here as “Rationalisation” is, to my knowledge, the first English version of a presentation given by Simone Weil in February 1937 and included in her complete works under the French title “<em>Rationalisation</em>.”</p> 2024-01-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Global Labour Journal https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5724 Review of Supriya RoyChowdhury (2021) City of Shadows: Slums and Informal Work in Bangalore 2024-01-09T06:44:55+00:00 Tom Barnes tom.barnes@acu.edu.au 2024-01-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Global Labour Journal https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5704 Review of Neva Löw (2023) Solidarität und ihre Widersprüche. Gewerkschaften im Sommer der Migration 2015 [Solidarity and its contradictions. Trade Unions in the Summer of Migration 2015] 2023-12-05T08:53:55+00:00 Jannis Eicker jannis.eicker@uni-kassel.de 2024-01-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Global Labour Journal https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5483 Racial Capitalism and Global Labour Studies – a Missed Encounter ? 2023-07-05T18:32:10+00:00 Jörg Nowak joerg.nowak@gmx.de <p>Despite of the centrality of the topic of labour in the 1983 book by Cedric Robinson, Black Marxism, global labour studies have devoted little attention to the concept of racial capitalism that became established with Robinson’s book. Robinson’s main claim is that the first proletariat formed in the plantations in colonized countries from about the 16th century, calling into question the crucial relevance of the industrial proletariat in England (and Europe) for the emergence of the labour movement. In taking up recent debates on racial capitalism that are inspired by Robinson´s work, but which also expand and criticize it, this text proposes a more integrated theorization of race and labour. It also takes up debates about the Plantationocene as a complex dispositive which connects ecological rupture, large scale production and racialised labour.</p> 2024-01-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Global Labour Journal https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5207 Precarious Associational Power 2022-11-22T12:31:36+00:00 Felix Syrovatka f.syrovatka@fu-berlin.de <p class="Body1"><span lang="EN-GB">This article examines the transformation of employers’ associations in the German metal and electrical industry from the perspective of the power resources approach. It argues that, as a result of changing economic conditions and the decline of trade union countervailing power, the institutional power resources of employers’ associations have been relativised, which in turn has led to a reassessment of employers’ associations by capital. Employers’ associations have responded by extending exclusive services to their members. Using the power resources approach, the article makes a concrete determination of the relationship between companies and employers’ associations. In doing so, the article contributes to a better understanding of the function, role and development of employers’ associations. At the same time, it contributes to the debate on the further development of the power resources approach and its extension to the analysis of employers’ power.</span></p> 2024-01-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Global Labour Journal https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5408 Pandemic Necrolabour and Essential Workers in the UK and France 2023-05-03T15:30:55+00:00 Sarah Waters s.a.waters@leeds.ac.uk <p class="Body1"><span lang="EN-GB">Drawing on recent studies on the necropolitics of Covid-19, this paper focuses on UK and French government policies towards essential workers, examining the conditions under which workers were systematically exposed to deadly harm within these two contrasting economic models. I argue that the pandemic revealed a category of necrolabour whose labour value supersedes their right to life and who could be legitimately sacrificed in the interests of the economy. Statistical recording shows that internationally, death rates amongst low-income essential workers were disproportionately high. We will see that workers’ exposure to death was as much a consequence of state authority that compelled them to continue working, at risk to their lives, as an outcome of official negligence that left many unprotected and lacking basic rights. Without legislative changes to improve employment rights and social protection, the unnecessary deaths of socially marginalised workers in essential jobs are likely to persist in the post-pandemic economy. </span></p> <p class="paragraph" style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; line-height: 200%; vertical-align: baseline;"> </p> 2024-01-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Global Labour Journal https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5737 Editorial: Going Against the Grain: Our Commitment to Truly Global Labour Studies 2024-01-31T09:17:28+00:00 Global Labour Journal globallabour@mcmaster.ca 2024-01-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Global Labour Journal