Decriminalizing Payment of Gamete Donors and Surrogates in Canada An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Public Debate in Light of Bill C-404
Main Article Content
Abstract
On 29 May 2018, the Liberal MP Anthony Housefather tabled Bill C-404 titled An Act to amend the Assisted Human Reproduction Act which seeks to decriminalize the payment of gamete donors and surrogates across Canada. Although Prime Minister Justin Trudeau indicated the importance of having a societal debate on the subject, the bill was read only once by the House of Commons before it died on the Order Paper. Bill C-404 aimed to increase the number of Canadian gamete donors and surrogates to fulfill Canada's domestic needs, which are purportedly not being met because of a lack of economic incentives on the supply side and the existence of a grey market that deters some Canadians in acting as donors or surrogates and causes intending parents to fear being criminally sanctioned if the reimbursement they pay is deemed unrelated or unreasonable. While Bill C-404 has not been adopted by Parliament, this paper seeks to analyze the policy tensions at the heart of the decriminalization of payment of donors and surrogates—tensions that may well resurface in the future. As long as the alleged shortage of donors and surrogates persists, stakeholders are likely to continue to advocate for legislative change.
Le 29 mai 2018, le député libéral Anthony Housefather a déposé le projet de loi C-404 intitulé Loi modifiant la Loi sur la procréation assistée, qui vise à décriminaliser le paiement des donneurs de gamètes et des mères porteuses au Canada. Bien que le premier ministre Justin Trudeau ait souligné l'importance d'avoir un débat de société sur le sujet, le projet de loi n'a été lu qu'une seule fois par la Chambre des communes avant de mourir au feuilleton. Le projet de loi C-404 visait à augmenter le nombre de donneurs de gamètes et de mères porteuses pour répondre aux besoins intérieurs du Canada qui ne seraient pas satisfaits en raison du manque d'incitatifs économiques et de l'existence d'un marché gris qui dissuade certains Canadiens d'agir comme donneurs ou mères porteuses et qui fait en sorte que les parents craignent de possibles sanctions criminelles si le remboursement qu'ils offrent est jugé non-relié ou déraisonnable. Bien que le projet de loi C-404 n'ait pas été adopté par le Parlement, le présent document cherche à analyser les tensions politiques qui sont au coeur de la décriminalisation de la rémunération des donneurs et des mères porteuses—tensions qui pourraient bien réapparaître dans l'avenir, car la pénurie alléguée de donneurs et de mères porteuses est susceptible de persister et il est probable que les intervenants continueront à plaider pour un changement législatif.
Metrics
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).