Exploring possibilities for student-staff partnerships and beyond in discipline-based education research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5760Keywords:
Active Student Participation, Discipline-Based Education Research, co-creation, research cycleAbstract
Discipline-based education research (DBER) uses researchers’ disciplinary background to inform investigations into university teaching and learning. The terms of student involvement in DBER are often dictated by the researchers, with student choice limited to whether or not they will contribute data. This is counter to the ethos of active student participation in which students can directly influence their university studies. While examples of DBER projects with students as collaborators rather than as informants or subjects exist, such opportunities are usually available to a few students. This paper explores where, why, and how students could contribute to DBER projects by exploring different roles students can take and examining the possibilities for student input to the process of educational research when viewed as an investigative cycle. This identifies places where students can influence research work while being able to disengage as necessary. Going beyond individual students, whole-class contributions also appear practical, opening up the possibility to “co-create DBER.”
Downloads
References
Angelo, T. A. (2017). Assessing motivation to improve learning: Practical applications of Keller’s MVP model and ARCS-V design process. New Directions in Teaching & Learning, 2017(152), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20272
Barrineau, S., Engström, A., & Schnaas, U. (2019). An active student participation companion. Avdelningen för kvalitetsutveckling - Enheten för universitetspedagogik. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-376580
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79, 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning (18): Global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176–188). Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development, Oxford Brookes University.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
Canning, J., & Masika, R. (2020). The scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL): The thorn in the flesh of educational research. Studies in Higher Education, 47(6), 1084–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1836485
Collins, T. D., Atchison, C. L., & Whitmeyer, S. J. (2023). A critical incident analysis of inclusive fieldwork with students as co-researchers. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 47(4), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2022.2122029
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development (pp. 43–77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Costello, B., Brennan, J., Loughlin, C., & Gallagher, A. (2020). Learner engagement on a blended ethics education programme: Perspectives of students and teachers. In K. Gravett, N. Yakovchuk, & I. M. Kinchin (Eds.), Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_14
Curran, R. (2017). Students as partners—good for students, good for staff: A study on the impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff engagement. International Journal of Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3089
De Ketele, J.-M. (2014). L’accompagnement des étudiants dans l’enseignement une tentative de modélisation [Supporting students in higher education: Proposal for a theoretical framework]. Recherche et Formation, 77(3), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.4000/rechercheformation.2321
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Dollinger, M., Tai, J., Jorre St Jorre, T., Ajjawi, R., Krattli, S., D., P., & McCarthy, D. (2023). Student partners as co-contributors in research: A collective autoethnographic account. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(6), 1377–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2139359
Elby, A., & Yerdelen-Damar, S. (2020). Rethinking the relationship between instructors and physics education researchers. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16, 020151. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020151
Eslahi, A., Chadeesingh, D. R., Foreman, C., & Alpay, E. (2020). 3D Printers in engineering education. In K. Gravett, N. Yakovchuk, & I. M. Kinchin (Eds.), Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_7
Felten, P., Bagg, J., Bumbry, M., Hill, J., Hornsby, K., Pratt, M., & Weller, S. (2013). A call for expanding inclusive student engagement in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 63–74. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/57386
Foreman, C., Hilditch, M., Rockliff, N., & Clarke, H. (2020). A comparison of student perceptions of physical and virtual engineering laboratory classes. In K. Gravett, N. Yakovchuk, & I. M. Kinchin (Eds.), Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_10
Fung, D. (2017). A connected curriculum for higher education. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781911576358
Gravett, K., Yakovchuk, N., & Kinchin, I. M. (Eds.). (2020). Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Guillaume, L., Laurent, V., & Genge, M. J. (2023). Immersive and interactive three-dimensional virtual fieldwork: Assessing the student learning experience and value to improve inclusivity of geosciences degrees. Journal of Geoscience Education, 71(4), 462–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2023.2200361
Hanratty, S., & McNamara, A. (2020). Student Experience: Perspectives on learning in the university and the conservatoire. In K. Gravett, N. Yakovchuk, & I. M. Kinchin (Eds.), Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_3
Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445637
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Healey, M., Healey, R. L., & West, H. (2023). Reflections on disciplinary perspectives on students as partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.5444
Healey, R., Lerczak, A., Welsh, K., & France, D. (2019). By any other name? The impacts of differing assumptions, expectations, and misconceptions in bringing about resistance to student-staff partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3550
Henderson, C., Connolly, M., Dolan, E. L., Finkelstein, N., Franklin, S., Malcom, S., Rasmussen, C., Redd, K., & John, K. St. (2017). Towards the STEM DBER alliance: Why we need a discipline-based STEM education research community. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20168
Hensel, N. H. (Ed.). (2018). Course-based undergraduate research: Educational equity and high-impact practice. Stylus Publishing.
James, W., Bustamante, C., Lamons, K., Scanlon, E., & Chini, J. J. (2020). Disabling barriers experienced by students with disabilities in postsecondary introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16, 020111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020111
Kingsbury, C. G., Sibert, E. C., Killingback, Z., & Atchison, C. L. (2020). “Nothing about us without us”: The perspectives of autistic geoscientists on inclusive instructional practices in geoscience education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(4), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1768017
Koretsky, M., Kelly, C., & Gummer, E. (2011). Student perceptions of learning in the laboratory: Comparison of industrially situated virtual laboratories to capstone physical laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 540–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00026.x
Kwong, K., & Collins, A. (2020). Student perspectives on a nutrition curriculum. In K. Gravett, N. Yakovchuk, & I. M. Kinchin (Eds.), Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships (pp. 201 –215). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_13
Larsson, M., Mårtensson, K., Price, L., & Roxå, T. (2020). Constructive friction? Charting the relation between educational research and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 8(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.5
Lenette, C. (2022). Participatory action research: Ethics and decolonization. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512456.001.0001
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2020). Exploration of how curriculum co-creation advances student and staff aims for Scottish higher education [PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh]. https://doi.org/10.7488/era/496
Marquis, E., Jayaratnam, A., Lei, T., & Mishra, A. (2019). Motivations, barriers, & understandings: How students at four universities perceive student–faculty partnership programs. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(6), 1240–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1638349
Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L., & Turner, J. (2018). Conceptions of students as partners. Higher Education, 76(6), 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y
Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Russell, S., & Enright, E. (2019). It is a complicated thing: Leaders’ conceptions of students as partners in the neoliberal university. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2196–2207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1482268
Maunder, R. E. (2021). Staff and student experiences of working together on pedagogic research projects: Partnerships in practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1205–1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1809999
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Bovill, C. (2020). Equity and diversity in institutional approaches to student–staff partnership schemes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2541–2557. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1620721
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Niculescu, I. O., Nagpal, S., & Rees, R. (2020). Creating space for new expertise: Considerations for setting-up student-staff partnerships. In K. Gravett, N. Yakovchuk, & I. M. Kinchin (Eds.), Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships (pp. 329–346). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_20
Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research (4th ed.). Wiley.
Ronayne Sohr, E., Gupta, A., Johnson, B. J., & Quan, G. M. (2020). Examining the dynamics of decision making when designing curriculum in partnership with students: How should we proceed? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16, 020157. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020157
Semken, S., Bhattacharyya, J., Duggan-Haas, D., Pallant, A., & Wiggen, J. (2018). Research on instructional strategies to improve geoscience learning in different settings and with different technologies. In K. St. John (Ed.), Community framework for geoscience education research. National Association of Geoscience Teachers. https://doi.org/10.25885/ger_framework/9
Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13362
St. John, K., & McNeal, K. S. (2017). The strength of evidence pyramid: One approach for characterizing the strength of evidence of Geoscience Education Research (GER) community claims. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.5408/17-264.1
Stead, R., Dimitrova, R., Pourgoura, A., Roberts, S., & West, S. (2020). Building knowledge and learning communities using LEGO in nursing. In K. Gravett, N. Yakovchuk, & I. M. Kinchin (Eds.), Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships (pp. 77–96). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_6
Sullivan, A. K., & Heron, M. (2020). Student-staff partnerships in higher education as process and approach. In K. Gravett, N. Yakovchuk, & I. M. Kinchin (Eds.), Enhancing student-centred teaching in higher education: The landscape of student-staff research partnerships (pp. 347–362). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_21
Tai, J. H.-M., Dollinger, M., Ajjawi, R., Jorre de St Jorre, T., Krattli, S., McCarthy, D., & Prezioso, D. (2023). Designing assessment for inclusion: An exploration of diverse students’ assessment experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2082373
Talanquer, V. (2014). DBER and STEM education reform: Are we up to the challenge? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(6), 809–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21162
Tong, V. C. H., Standen, A., & Sotiriou, M. (2018). Shaping higher education with students: Ways to connect research and teaching. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787351110
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kirsty Dunnett
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
