The power of reflective transformations
Students-faculty partnership as a catalyst
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5782Keywords:
photovoice, picture transformation, students as partners (SaP), English as a Second Language (ESL), Asian contextAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze two students as partners (SaP) collaboration experiences and identify transformations of four undergraduate students and faculty who partnered to enhance an English as a second language (ESL) course taught at a Sino-foreign university. This paper utilized qualitative exploratory research with a pre-post design, where photovoice as a visual research method was adapted and used to portray and highlight the participants’ actual experiences and transformations that happened during the student-faculty partnership. The three transformations experienced by members of the partnership include: (a) the transformation from solitary to cooperative, referring to the closer relationship amongst faculty, student partners, and enrolled students; (b) the transformation from prey to predators, signifying the increased professional and learning capacity of both faculty and students; and (c) the transformation from inexperienced to mature, indicating self-growth based on overcoming obstacles. The findings have practical implications for future studies in that researchers can use the photovoice methodology to track participants’ experiences, except for traditional verbal and written data collection methods. However, the size of the research sample, which consisted of five females, limits the findings, and the uncertainty of the long-term effect of the transformations mentioned above should be further explored.
Downloads
References
Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Cook-Sather, A. (2011). Lessons in higher education: Five pedagogical practices that promote active learning for faculty and students. The journal of faculty development, 25(3), 33-39.
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: a
threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic
Development, 19(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
Cook-Sather, A., & Abbot, S. (2016). Translating partnerships: How faculty-student collaboration in explorations of teaching and learning can transform perceptions, terms, and selves. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.5
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2017). Where student engagement meets faculty development: How student-faculty pedagogical partnership fosters a sense of belonging. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(2), 3-3.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Daviduke, N. (2018). Growing into pedagogical partnerships over time and across
disciplines: My experience as a non-STEM student consultant in STEM courses. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3443
De Cremer, D. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1335-1341.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236830
Eisner, E. W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation.
Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4-10.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026006004
François, C., Gilardi, F., Halim, D., Hirzel, T., & Tan, K. C. (2016). Engaging and
empowering student representatives as agents of change at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 9(13), 1-13.
Glaw, X., Inder, K., Kable, A., & Hazelton, M. (2017). Visual Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Autophotography and Photo Elicitation Applied to Mental Health Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748215
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual studies, 17(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
Hoppitt, W. J., Brown, G. R., Kendal, R., Rendell, L., Thornton, A., Webster, M. M., & Laland, K. N. (2008). Lessons from animal teaching. Trends in ecology & evolution, 23(9), 486-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.05.008
Kaur, A., Cliffe, A., Benlahcene, A., & Noman, M. (2021). The impact of student-faculty partnerships on student partners who become academics. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 1-9.
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., & Simoni, H. (2018). Co-researching co-creation of the curriculum:
Reflections on arts-based methods in education and connections to health care co-production. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3427
O’Malley, L. J. & Munsell, S. E. (2020). PhotoVoice: An Innovative Qualitative Method in
Research and Classroom Teaching. Educational Research: Theory and Practice,
(1), 26-32.
Pain, H. (2012). A Literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual
methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11, 303–319.
https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100401
Poon, A. F. Y., O'Flynn-Magee, K., Rodney, P., Radu, R., Turner, H., Burnay, M., ... & Dhari, R. (2022). Living a student-faculty partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 6(1), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v6i1.4872
Roberts, R. C. (2009). The sophistication of non-human emotion. In R. W. Lurz (Ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds (pp. 218-236). Cambridge University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications
Ltd. Schlosser, J. A., & Sweeney, A. (2015). One year of collaboration: reflections
on student-faculty partnership. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(15), 2.
Solórzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro education, 60-73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2696265
Tsang, K. K. (2020). Photovoice data analysis: Critical approach, phenomenological approach, and beyond. Beijing International Review of Education, 2(1), 136-152.
Vikhnevich, S., Gao, Y., Jiang, L., Chen, X., & Li, C. (2022). Attitudes and Intentions that
Made It Work: Students-Faculty Partnership in China. The Journal of Educational
Innovation, Partnership and Change, 8(2).
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for
participatory needs assessment. Health education & behavior, 24(3), 369-387.
https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
Wolf-Wendel, L., Ward, K., & Kinzie, J. (2009). A tangled web of terms: The overlap and
unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding
college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 407-428.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuchen Gao, Chenyi Li, Svetlana Vikhnevich, Linghan Jiang, Xiwen Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
