Co-creating a simulation with students as active partners
A social work experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5837Keywords:
student as partners, social work, co-creation, simulation-based learning, disability-related barriersAbstract
This case study presents a students-as-partners (SaP) approach to field education in social work. In particular, it describes the co-creation of a simulation-based learning experience co created and delivered by faculty, staff and two students—a student who experiences disability-related barriers and a theatre student. It explores the principles inherent in a student as partners philosophy as well as a universal design approach were used to co-create the simulation scenarios. The study examines the application of a student as partners approach and universal design for learning (UDL) principles in the development of simulation scenarios, both of which emphasize inclusivity, collaboration, and engagement. The case study also highlights how a collaborative, inclusive approach to simulation-based learning enhances student engagement and learning outcomes, particularly for students experiencing barriers. The experience demonstrates the value of interdisciplinary partnerships and offers insights for supporting students with disabilities in social work education, suggesting future directions for the integration of SaP and UDL in academic settings.
Downloads
References
Al Gharib, K. A. & Arulappan, J. (2020). Repeated simulation experience on self-confidence, critical thinking, and competence of nurses and nursing students—an integrative review. SAGE Open Nursing, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960820927377
Anderson, A., Auston, D., Walton, C., Wood, A., Houlihan, A., Hard, E., & Bailey, K. (2023). Planning for co-curricular design-student voice, power dynamics and threshold learning: A thematic analysis of the student perspective. International Journal for Students as Partners, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.4937
Archer-Kuhn, B., Allen D., Schweizer, L., Meghji, F., & Taiwo, A. (2021). The obscure nature of signature pedagogy in social work education: A Canadian perspective. Social Work Education, 40(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1677587
Asakura, K., Sewell, K., Rawlings, M., Bay, U., & Kourgiantakis, T. (2023). Marion Bogo, a visionary, innovator, and leader: Reflecting on her groundbreaking work on simulation-based social work education. Journal of social work Education, 59(3), 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2022.2069626
Bogo, M., Kourgiantakis, T., Burns, D., King, B., & Lee, E. (2021). Guidelines for advancing clinical social work practice through articulating practice competencies: The Toronto simulation model. Clinical social work Journal, 49(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00777-6
Boitel, C. R., & Fromm, L. R. (2014). Defining signature pedagogy in social work education: Learning theory and the learning contract. Journal of social work and Education, 50(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2014.947161
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Canadian Association for Social Work Education. (2021). Educational policies and accreditation standards for social work education. https://caswe-acfts.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EPAS-2021-1.pdf
Caravaca-Morera, J., Carmiol-Rodriguez, P., Sanabria-Barahona, H., Bellaguarda, M. L., Padilha, M. I., & Silva, A. (2024). From acting to simulation: Contributions of theatre students to healthcare simulation. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 19(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.02.016
Cornish, F., Breton, N., Delgado, J., Rua, M., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1
Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015). Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simulation in healthcare. Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 10(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
Jefferies, G., Davis, C Mason, J., & Yadav, R. (2024). Using simulation to prepare social work students for field education. Social Work Education, 43(5), 1369–1383. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2185219
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Kourgiantakis, T., Bogo, M., & Sewell, K. M. (2019). Practice Fridays: Using simulation to develop holistic competence. Journal of social work Education, 55(3), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2018.1548989
Litvack, A., Bogo, M., & Mishna, F. (2010). Emotional reactions of students in field education: An exploratory study. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(2), 227–243. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23044407
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2018). Students as partners in learning and teaching: The benefits of co-creation of the curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3207
MacEwan University, (2021), Teaching Greatness: Strategic Vision 2030. MacEwan University.
Maidment, J., & Crisp, B. R. (2011). The impact of emotions on practicum learning. Social Work Education, 30(04), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.501859
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Reeser, L. C. (1992). Students with disabilities in practicum: What is reasonable accommodation? Journal of social work Education, 28(1), 98–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23042785
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027998
Sollars, E. D., & Xenakis, N. (2021). Simulation-based continuing education in health care social work: A case study of clinical training innovation. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00806-y
Sunarich N., Rowan, S. (2017). Social work simulation education in the field. Field Educator, 7 (1), 1–9. https://fieldeducator.simmons.edu/article/social-work-simulation-education-in-the-field/
Tam, D. M. Y., Brown, A., Paz, E., Birnbaum, R., & Kwok, S. M. (2018). Challenges faced by Canadian social work field instructors in baccalaureate field supervision. Journal of Teaching in social work, 38(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2018.1502228
Tortorelli, C., Peter Choate, Marissa C., Naya El Jamal, S. K., & Katherine Schantz. (2021). Simulation in social work: Creativity of students and faculty during COVID-19. Social Sciences, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10010007
Watts, P. I., McDermott, D. S., Alinier, G., Charnetski, M., Ludlow, J., Horsley, E., Meakim, C., & Nawathe, P. A. (INACSL Standards Committee) (2021). Healthcare simulation standards of best practice simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.009
White, N., Morales, S., & Wright, D. (2014). Field Placements: Are our students with disabilities the pearls of the School of Social Work? Field Educator, 4(1),1–8. https://fieldeducator.simmons.edu/article/should-schools-of-social-work-act-as-field-agencies-for-students-with-disabilities/
Zulkosky, K., Minchoff, D., Dommel, L., Price, A., & Handzlik, B. M. (2021). Effect of repeating simulation scenarios on student knowledge, performance, satisfaction, and self-confidence. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 55, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.03.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dennis Huseinovic, Eli Yaschuk, Kealey Dube, Natalia Rohatyn-Martin, Fernanda dos Santos Nogueira de Goes, Deanna Fidelak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
