Assessment Met-befores
What students bring to assessment partnerships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i2.5886Keywords:
assessment, assessment partnerships, met-befores, teacher education, assessment in higher educationAbstract
This article is based on a study that explored pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) perceptions of assessment as a result of their participation in a foundations course in a teacher education program, in which assessment was taken up as a partnership. Upon completion of the course, PSTs responded to the question: What was your experience of assessment as a partnership? Using McGowen and Tall’s (2010) concept of a “met-before” (a learner’s mental structure as a result of previous learning experiences), responses were identified that evidenced assessment met-befores. Thematic analysis revealed three categories of met-befores: (a) assessment within systems of telling and compliance, (b) self-assessments do not count, and (c) grades determined through events. These categories and their influences on students’ sense-making of their role in assessment partnerships are discussed. Based on the findings, recommendations are made for teacher educators and professors in higher education to consider the role met-befores play in student learning and the potential for developing future supportive assessment met-befores with students.
Downloads
References
Aoki, T. T. (1993). Legitimating lived curriculum: Towards a curricular landscape of multiplicity. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 8(3) 255-268.
Ayalon, M., & Wilkie, K. J. (2020). Developing assessment literacy through approximations of practice: Exploring secondary mathematics pre-service teachers developing criteria for a rich quadratics task. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, Article 103011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103011
Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2004). Engaging the curriculum. McGraw-Hill Education.
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning was important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 24-36). Routledge.
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Bovill, C. (2017). A framework to explore roles within student-staff partnerships in higher education: Which students are partners, when, and in what ways?. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3062
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buck, G. A., Trauth‐Nare, A., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessment discernible to pre‐service teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20344
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
Carter, S., & Andersen, C. (2023). Connecting and activating prior knowledge. Wellbeing in educational contexts (2nd ed.). University of Southern Queensland Pressbooks.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Chen, S. W. (2023). Student partnership in assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1402–1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2224948
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Cook-Sather, A., & Matthews, K. E. (2021). Pedagogical partnership: Engaging with students as co-creators of curriculum, assessment and knowledge. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus: A learning-centred approach (pp. 243–259). Routledge.
Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Deeley, S. J., & Brown, R. A. (2014). Learning through partnership in assessment. Teaching and learning together in higher education, 1(13), 3. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/issA13/3
Dong, A., Jong, M. S. Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How does prior knowledge influence learning engagement? The mediating roles of cognitive load and help-seeking. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 591203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 3–31. https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/3609/
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re‐imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2018, March 21). Prior knowledge: Why it matters and what we can do. Medium. https://medium.com/learn-better/prior-knowledge-why-it-matters-and-what-we-can-do-766ab54edd0f
Hazelkorn, E. (2018). The accountability and transparency agenda: Emerging issues in the global era. In A. Curaj, L. Deca, & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies (pp. 423–439). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_26
Knight, P. T. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220000662
Lorber, P. Rooney, S., & Van Der Enden, M. (2019). S Making assessment accessible: A student-staff partnership perspective, Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1695524
McGowen, M. (2017). Examining the role of prior experience in the learning of algebra. In S. Stewart (Ed.), And the rest is just algebra (pp. 19–39). Springer International Publishing.
McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2013). Flexible thinking and met-befores: Impact on learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.06.004
McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2010). Metaphor or met-before? The effects of previous experience on the practice and theory of learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.08.002
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (2012). Knowledge to go: A motivational and dispositional view of transfer. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.693354
Saher, A. S., Ali, A. M. J., Amani, D., & Najwan, F. (2022). Traditional versus authentic assessments in higher education. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(1), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.29
Stefani, L. A. (1998). Assessment in partnership with learners. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230402
Taras, M. (2002). Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000020273
Yates, G., & Chandler, M. (1994). Prior knowledge and how it influences classroom learning: What does the research tell us. Set: Research Information for Teachers, (2), 1-8.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Allison Tucker, Marc Husband
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
