Improving equality, diversity, and inclusion in staff-student partnerships
A constructive framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5941Keywords:
equity, diversity, inclusion, EDI, staff-student partnerships, medical staff-student partnerships, interdisciplinaryAbstract
Staff-student partnerships have become increasingly popular in educational spaces. Although staff-student partnerships have been shown to improve the inclusivity of assessment practices and increase curriculum engagement among underprivileged student partners, student partners still face barriers to access and face challenges when engaging in such opportunities. This makes it particularly important that all stakeholders involved, including institutions, staff, and students, actively work towards creating a cultural shift that celebrates and amplifies the minority voice. This paper is grounded both in current research and in evidence from a transdisciplinary staff-student partnership project from Imperial College London. During this project, team members conducted interviews and focus group discussions with students and staff from diverse backgrounds in order to develop a multimedia resource platform on best assessment practices. This paper provides a constructive framework, split into three themes, for promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in staff-student partnerships. The three overarching themes involve improving the inclusivity of selection processes, creating a flexible and trust-based working culture, and addressing power dynamics inherent in staff-student partnerships.
Downloads
References
Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
Anderson, N., Lett, E., Asabor, E. N., Hernandez, A. L., Nguemeni Tiako, M. J., Johnson, C., Montenegro, R. E., Rizzo, T. M., Latimore, D., Nunez-Smith, M., & Boatright, D. (2022). The association of microaggressions with depressive symptoms and institutional satisfaction among a national cohort of medical students. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(2), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06786-6
Barradell, S., & Bell, A. (2021). Is health professional education making the most of the idea of “students as partners”? Insights from a qualitative research synthesis. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09998-3
Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula – A new trend or an old idea we never got around to implementing? In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning through research and scholarship: 20 years of ISL (pp. 96–108). The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development.
Bovill, C. (2019). Student–staff partnerships in learning and teaching: An overview of current practice and discourse. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1660628
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Englander, R., Holmboe, E., Batalden, P., Caron, R. M., Durham, C. F., Foster, T., Ogrinc, G., Ercan-Fang, N., & Batalden, M. (2020). Coproducing health professions education: A prerequisite to coproducing health care services? Academic Medicine, 95(7), 1006–1013. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003137
Goh, R. S. (2024) Tips on improving equality, diversity and inclusion in medical school assessments. Journal of Medical Education Research, 4(2), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.5750/jmer.v4i2.2272
Hope, D., Dewar, A., Hothersall, E. J., Leach, J. P., Cameron, I., & Jaap, A. (2021). Measuring differential attainment: A longitudinal analysis of assessment results for 1512 medical students at four Scottish medical schools. BMJ Open, 11(9), e046056. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046056
Hundley, S. P., & Keith, C. J. (Eds.). (2023). Trends in assessment: Ideas, opportunities, and issues for higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003440604
Imperial College London. (n.d.-a). Anatomy of assessment. Educational Development Unit. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/staff/educational-development/teaching-toolkit/anatomy-of-assessment/
Imperial College London. (n.d.-b). Stories of partnership. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/students/studentshapers/stories-of-partnership/
Jensen, K., & Bennett, L. (2016). Enhancing teaching and learning through dialogue: A student and staff partnership model. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2015.1113537
Jester, N. (2018). Representation within higher education curricula: Contextualising and advocating for feminist digital activism. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1465036
Johnson‐Bailey, J., & Cervero, R. M. (1998). Power dynamics in teaching and learning practices: an examination of two adult education classrooms. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17(6), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137980170605
Könings, K. D., Mordang, S., Smeenk, F., Stassen, L., & Ramani, S. (2021). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher, 43(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1838464
Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010024225888
Lucey, C. R., Hauer, K. E., Boatright, D., & Fernandez, A. (2020). Medical education’s wicked problem: Achieving equity in assessment for medical learners. Academic Medicine, 95(12S), S98–S108. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003717
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruth Shien Goh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
