It’s hard to ignore the data when the data is in the room
Examining the role of students as partners in critically-oriented reform of tertiary mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5948Keywords:
mathematics pedagogy, higher education, university student learning practices, critical approach, students as partnersAbstract
A growing body of research demonstrates the benefits of engaging students as partners to improve tertiary education. Yet, more research is needed to understand how students can support critical transformations outside of the classroom context. In this qualitative study, we explored how a networked improvement community (NIC) engaged students as partners toward critically transforming introductory tertiary mathematics courses in spring 2023. Using an open coding process, we analyzed field notes, interviews, and journals from NIC members to develop themes describing the NIC’s positioning of students. We compared these themes to Holen et al.’s (2021) framework on student-institutional partnerships. Findings reveal four positions students may adopt in critical transformation efforts: democratic participant, apprentice, consultant, and beneficiary. This study contributes to the field’s understanding of ways students can influence larger structural and cultural systems that impact student success, as well as challenges inherent in this work.
Downloads
References
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Cook-Sather, A., & Agu, P. (2013). Student consultants of color and faculty members working together toward culturally sustaining pedagogy. To Improve the Academy, 32(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/tia.17063888.0032.020
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Cook-Sather, A., Matthews, K.E., Ntem, A., & Leathwick, S. (2018). What we talk about when we talk about students as partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3790
Cook-Sather A., Salmeron D., & Smith, T. (2023). Humanizing STEM education through student-faculty pedagogical partnerships. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1153087
Ellis, J., Fosdick, B.K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS ONE, 11(7), Article e0157447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447
Gutiérrez, R. (2011). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Choppin, J., & Pimm, D. (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices, and policies (pp. 17–33). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2813-4
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Holen, R., Ashwin, P., Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2021). Student partnership: Exploring the dynamics in and between different conceptualizations. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2726–2737. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1770717
Hughes, A. (2022). Equitable outcomes and indigenous learners of mathematics: Deconstructing Australian education policy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2127490
Jardine, H. E. (2020). Positioning undergraduate teaching and learning assistants as instructional partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i1.4032
Marquis, E., Puri, V., Wan, S., Ahmad, A., Goff, L., Knorr, K., Vassileva, I., & Woo, J. (2016). Navigating the threshold of student–staff partnerships: A case study from an Ontario teaching and learning institute. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113538
Martin, D., Gholson, M., & Leonard, J. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of power. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v3i2a95
Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L., & Turner, J. (2018). Conceptions of students as partners. Higher Education, 76, 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y
Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Russell, S., & Enright, E. (2019). It is a complicated thing: Leaders’ conceptions of students as partners in the neoliberal university. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2196–2207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1482268
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Mertens, D. M. (2017). Transformative research: Personal and societal. International Journal for Transformative Research, 4(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijtr-2017-0001
Peters, J., & Mathias, L. (2018). Enacting student partnership as though we really mean it: Some Freirean principles for a pedagogy of partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3509
Penuel, W. R., Riedy, R., Barber, M. S., Peurach, D. J., LeBouef, W. A., & Clark, T. (2020). Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders: Toward requirements for a new research and development infrastructure. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 627–674. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938126
Rasmussen, C., Marrongelle, K., & Borba, M. C. (2014). Research on calculus: What do we know and where do we need to go? ZDM – Mathematics Education, 46, 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0615-x
Reinholz, D. L., & Apkarian, N. (2018). Four frames for systemic change in STEM departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0103-x
Reinholz, D. L., White, I. & Andrews, T. (2021). Change theory in STEM higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00291-2
Revelo, R. A., & Baber, L. D. (2018). Engineering resistors: Engineering Latina/o students and emerging resistant capital. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717719132
Sharma, U. (2020). Inclusive education in the Pacific: Challenges and opportunities. Prospects, 49, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09498-7
University of California, Irvine. (n.d.). Minority serving institution directory. UCI Office of Inclusive Excellence. Retrieved February 24, 2025, from https://inclusion.uci.edu/core-programs/minority-thriving-campus/msi-directory/
Vithal, R., Brodie, K., & Subbaye, R. (2024). Equity in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01504-4
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Margaret Ann Bolick, Leilani Pai, Rachel Funk, Matthew Voigt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
