Testing students-as-partners theory

Science and engineering students’ perspectives on a students-as-partners consultant model for supporting an instructor-centered curriculum development community of practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i2.5951

Keywords:

students as partners, student-staff partnership, science curriculum development, higher education

Abstract

Students as partners (SaP) has emerged as a way to innovate curriculum development and create more inclusive learning experiences for students in postsecondary settings. Popular models of SaP are time intensive, involving student and instructor dyads that meet frequently. Less is known about short-term consultant models of SaP and the impact on students. This study proposes a student-as-partners consultant (SaP-C) model and tests whether it can operationalize the principles of SaP theory. Student responses to a questionnaire (n= 7, 41% response rate), analyzed using an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach, indicate that the SaP-C approach does, according to students’ perspectives, operationalize SaP principles and positively influences students’ feelings of connection to other students and faculty. This model offers instructors an evidence-based, less time-intensive way to work in partnership with students in order to be pedagogically responsive to their perspectives and experiences in course or program design efforts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Casey, A. (2024). The power of naming students-as-partners practices. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5473

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in teaching and learning: a guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.

Dollinger, M., & Lodge, J. (2020). Student-staff co-creation in higher education: An evidence informed model to support future design and implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(5), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1663681

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as

partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher

Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2019). Students as partners guide: Student engagement through partnership: A guide and update to the Advance HE framework. HE Academy. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/60f1b3884b8603014f48f1fd/t/66a75ff2d8c0e857fe0bb69a/1722245107018/SaP+Guide+-+Updated.pdf

Lexis, L., Julien, B. L., Loch, B., Civitella, M., Keogh, B., Boffa, M., Jelley, T., Sawyer, F., Ramadan, S., Pokhriyal, P., & Carpenter, J. (2023). A multidisciplinary STEM and liberal arts students-as-partners project promoted the development of employability skills and embodied partnership values. International Journal for Students as Partners, 7(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.5032

Lukes, L., Mazabel, S., Sherman, S. B., Gilley, B., & Pete, S. (2023). Designing a collaborative faculty-student mentoring model in a large, complex science curriculum development team project.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 175, 61–70.

Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119

Peart, D., Rumbold, P., & Fukar, E. (2023). Student engagement through partnership: A literature review. Advance HE. https://advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/student-engagement-through-partnership-literature-review

Sherman, S.B., Mazabel, S., Lukes, L., & EaSEIL student partners. (2024). What I want my science instructors to know: Students sharing experiences and perspectives on learning science in field settings and beyond. https://blogs.ubc.ca/easeil/

Downloads

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

Lukes, L., & Rocha, L. (2025). Testing students-as-partners theory: Science and engineering students’ perspectives on a students-as-partners consultant model for supporting an instructor-centered curriculum development community of practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 9(2), 108–140. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i2.5951

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Laura Lukes, Larissa Rocha

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).