Partnership as an entangled space of becoming
Reflections on a collaborative journey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i2.6022Keywords:
Equity, joy, Transformation, Reciprocity, ConnectionAbstract
Two university staff members and two former students reflect on their collaborative journey, beginning in 2019 and continuing through the Covid-19 pandemic. The paper examines motivations for engaging in Student-Staff Partnership (SSP) projects, evolving understandings of partnership, and challenges faced. Rooted in Freirean principles of hope, transformation, dialogue, and collaboration, the partnership fostered reciprocal relationships and disrupted traditional hierarchies. The collaboration began with a student-designed mentoring scheme and evolved into a deeper inquiry into equity, social justice, and supportive learning environments. Despite systemic challenges, the partnership thrived on micro-moments of joy, connection, and mutual support, highlighting the transformative potential of Freirean partnership. The reflection underscores the importance of process over product, emphasizing mutual respect, dialogue, and hope in creating meaningful educational experiences.
Downloads
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway, Durham, NC: Duke University Press
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
Birmingham Newman University (2020). Strategic Framework 2020-2025.
Birmingham Newman University (2025). Access and Participation Plan 2025-26 to 2028-29
Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadic ethics. In D. W. Smith & H. Somers-Hall (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Deleuze (pp. 170–197). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511753657.009
Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London: Penguin
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler.
Department for Education. (2023). Academic year 2021/22: Foundation year participation, provision and outcomes at HE providers. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/foundation-years-statistics
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath.
Fellows, I., Gilbert, G., Mathias, L., & Parkes, S. (2025). Disrupting the third-space through playfulness, mattering, and unbounded perspectives. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 33. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1249
Felten, P., & Lambert, L. M. (2020). Relationship-rich education: How human connections drive success in college. Johns Hopkins University Press
Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
Freire, P. (2013). Education for critical consciousness. London: Bloomsbury
Gannon, S., Taylor, C., Adams, G., Donaghue, H., Hannan-Swain, S., Harris-Evans, J., Healey, J., & Moore, P. (2019). Working on a rocky shore: Micro-moments of positive affect in academic work. Emotion, Space and Society, 31, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2019.04.002
Harris, P. Haywood, C. and Mac an Ghaill, M. (2016). Higher Education, de-centred subjectivities and the emergence of a pedagogical self among Black and South Asian students, Race, Ethnicity and Education, 20(3), 358-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1260234
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
Healey, M., Healey, R. L., & West, H. (2023). Reflections on disciplinary perspectives on students as partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.5444
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Parkes, S., Seal, M., & Mathias, L. (2018). Becoming a Newman foundation year student: Conscientization to promote democratic engagement, meaningful dialogue and co-operative working. Journal of the Foundation Year Network, 1, 71–86. https://jfyn.co.uk/index.php/ukfyn/article/view/21/19
Peters J., & Mathias, L. (2018). Enacting student partnership as though we really mean it: Some Freirean principles for a pedagogy of partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3509
Schon, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think and act. Avebury.
Seal, M. (2018). Participatory pedagogic impact research: Co-production with community partners in action. Routledge.
Seal, M., & Parkes, S. (2019). Pedagogy as transition: Student directed tutor groups on foundation years. Journal of the Foundation Year Network, 2, 7–20. https://jfyn.co.uk/index.php/ukfyn/article/view/40
Seal, M. (2021). Hopeful pedagogies in higher education. London/New York: Bloomsbury
Taylor, C. A. (2017). Rethinking the empirical in higher education: Post-qualitative inquiry as a less comfortable social science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 40(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1256984
Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation/HEFCE.
Zepke, N. (2018). Student engagement in neo-liberal times: What is missing?, Higher Education Research and Development, 37(2), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1370440
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Paul Keogh, Jody Hepworth, Anna Orrnert, Sarah Parkes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).