Mentorship for agency
A co-constructed case study of doctoral students as partners in course development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v10i1.6080Keywords:
mentorship, self-efficacy, students as partners, doctoral education, preparing future faculty, agency, high impact practicesAbstract
This case study examines how three doctoral students developed agency through partnering with a professor on course development projects. Framed by Bandura’s (1989; 2006) social cognitive theory and Code’s (2020) agency for learning framework, the study analyzes how these partnerships fostered students’ intentionality, forethought, self-regulation, and self-efficacy. Through individual interviews and a focus group, the research revealed that students experienced professional growth, enhanced collaborative relationships, increased ownership in course development, and improved integration of theory and practice. The findings demonstrate that course development partnerships can function as high-impact practices (HIPs) in doctoral education, providing opportunities for meaningful mentorship and authentic learning experiences. The study contributes to literature on students as partners (SAP) initiatives while offering insights into how faculty-student collaboration at the doctoral level can nurture student agency and professional development.
Downloads
References
Anderson, B., Cutright, M., & Anderson, S. (2013). Academic involvement in doctoral education: Predictive value of faculty mentorship and intellectual community on doctoral education outcomes. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 195–215. https://doi.org/10.28945/1923
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
Brill, J. L., Balcanoff, K. K., Land, D., Gogarty, M., & Turner, F. (2014). Best practices in doctoral retention: Mentoring. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(2), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v4i2.186
Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2016). Collaborative autoethnography. Routledge.
Code, J. (2020). Agency for learning: Intention, motivation, self-efficacy and self-regulation. Frontiers, 5(19). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019
Cook-Sather, A., Matthews, K. E., Ntem, A., & Leathwick, S. (2018). What we talk about when we talk about students as partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3790
Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2017). Where student engagement meets faculty development: How student-faculty pedagogical partnership fosters a sense of belonging. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(2), 3-11. https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/cook
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G. D., & O'Donnell, K. (2013). Ensuring quality & taking high-impact practices to scale. Association of American Colleges & Universities.
Zipp, G. P., & Olson, V. (2008). Infusing the mentorship model of education for the promotion of critical thinking in doctoral education. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 5(9). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v5i9.1229
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jaclyn Rivard, Veronica Wilson, Marki Alexander, Jamie Pang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
