Challenging the assessment narrative
Addressing assessment anxiety through the collaborative process of co-creation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v10i1.6691Keywords:
Co-creation, Assessment anxiety, Partnership, AssessmentAbstract
Test anxiety is on the rise within higher education, even though the phenomenon has been researched and interventions have been developed to address this issue. Often, approaches focus on actions that the student needs to perform to address the cognitive or physiological aspects of test anxiety. In this study, we explore the possibility that co-creation approaches to assessment can contribute to reducing assessment anxiety. Analysis of interviews and questionnaires with students identified four key themes: (a) the type of assessment is important in influencing students’ assessment anxiety, (b) knowing the assessor and assessment is important to students, (c) co-creation enables students to develop agency over assessments, (d) and co-creating with students helps reduce assessment anxiety. Results suggest that co-creation may reduce the worry component of assessment anxiety while other characteristic outcomes of co-creation (i.e., trust, respect, community, and a sense of belonging) may prove preventative against the emotionality component of assessment anxiety.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Barrineau, S., Engstrom, A., & Schnaas, U. (2019). An active student participation companion. Uppsala University.
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creating learning and teaching: Towards relational pedagogy in higher education. Critical Publishing.
Brandmo, C., Bråten, I., & Schewe, O. (2019). Social and personal predictors of test anxiety among Norwegian secondary and postsecondary students. Social Psychology of Education, 22(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9461-y
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide (A. Maher, Ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Buchanan, M. (2016, May 25). Exam stress “among teen suicide causes.” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36380910
Cabral, A., Fuller, S., De Wilde, J., Khama, K., & Melsen, M. (2023). Curriculum enhancement through co-creation: Fostering student-educator partnerships in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 7(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i2.5280
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty (M. Weimer, Ed.; 1st edition). Jossey-Bass.
Deeley, S. J. (2013). Summative co-assessment: A deep learning approach to enhancing employability skills and attributes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514649
Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047
Henderson, B., Chipchase, L., Aitken, R., & Lewis, L. K. (2022). Consensus marking as a grading method for the development of evaluative judgement: Comparing assessor and students. Nurse Education in Practice, 63, 103386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103386
Kaur, A., & Noman, M. (2020). Investigating students’ experiences of students as partners (SaP) for basic need fulfilment: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.8
Killam, L. A., Camargo-Plazas, P., & Luctkar-Flude, M. (2024). Learner-Educator Co-creation: A Case for Enhancing Authentic Assessment in Nursing Education. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.1.15194
Lowe, P. A., Lee, S. W., Witteborg, K. M., Prichard, K. W., Luhr, M. E., Cullinan, C. M., Mildren, B. A., Raad, J. M., Cornelius, R. A., & Janik, M. (2007). The Test Anxiety Inventory for Children and Adolescents (TAICA): Examination of the psychometric properties of a new multidimensional measure of test anxiety among elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282907303760
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., & Bovill, C. (2021). Do students experience transformation through co-creating curriculum in higher education? Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1928060
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2015). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Rodway, C., Tham, S.-G., Turnbull, P., Kapur, N., & Appleby, L. (2025). National review of higher education student suicide deaths: National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health. The University of Manchester and Department for Education. https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/ncish/reports/national-review-of-higher-education-student-suicide-deaths/
Roick, J., & Ringeisen, T. (2017). Self-efficacy, test anxiety, and academic success: A longitudinal validation. International Journal of Educational Research, 83, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.006
Segool, N. K., von der Embse, N. P., Mata, A. D., & Gallant, J. (2014). Cognitive behavioral model of test anxiety in a high-stakes context: An exploratory study. School Mental Health, 6(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-013-9111-7
Shackle, S. (2019, September 27). ‘The way universities are run is making us ill’: Inside the student mental health crisis. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/sep/27/anxiety-mental-breakdowns-depression-uk-students
Soares, D., & Woods, K. (2020). An international systematic literature review of test anxiety interventions 2011–2018. Pastoral Care in Education, 38(4), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2020.1725909
Spielberger, C. D., & Vagg, P. R. (1995). Test anxiety: A transactional process model. In C. D. Spielberger & P. R. Vagg (Eds.), Test anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment (Vols. 1–23, pp. 3–14). Taylor and Francis.
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Jorre De St Jorre, T. (2023). Assessment for inclusion: Rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451
Tan, S. H., & Pang, J. S. (2023). Test anxiety: An integration of the test anxiety and achievement motivation research traditions. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09737-1
Taylor, J., & Deane, F. P. (2002). Development of a short form of the Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI). The Journal of General Psychology, 129(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209603133
Van, K., Tasawar, S., Brendel, E. B. K., Law, C., Mahajan, A., Brownell‐Riddell, C., Diamond, N., Ritchie, K., & Monk, J. M. (2025). Using a ‘students as partners’ model to develop an authentic assessment promoting employability skills in undergraduate life science education. FEBS Open Bio, 15(3), 506–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13941
von der Embse, N., Jester, D., Roy, D., & Post, J. (2018). Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates: A 30-year meta-analytic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.048
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gerald Decelles III, Catherine Bovill
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
