A scalable and practical model for transforming student engagement from passive consumption to active co-creation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v10i1.6738Keywords:
students as partners, co-creation, active learning, inclusive pedagogy, anatomy and physiologyAbstract
This case study describes a students-as-partners initiative embedded within a content-intensive, high-enrollment, two-semester sequence in anatomy and physiology at a North American public university. The project emerged in response to a pedagogical misalignment between course demands and the generic, costly resources provided by commercial publishers. In collaboration with former undergraduate students, the instructor co-developed a suite of custom, inclusive learning tools: interactive eBook modules, HTML-based retrieval practice cards, customized homework activities, and quizzes. Working as co-learners, the team explored digital tools and adopted reciprocal roles throughout the design process. To assess impact, a survey was conducted at the end of the academic year. Respondents (N=991) rated each resource’s effectiveness and compared their learning experience with publisher-based courses. Results showed strong student endorsement across all tools, especially quizzes and homework. This case offers a replicable model for co-creating course materials designed to promote equity, accessibility, and disciplinary relevance in STEM education.
Downloads
References
Castro, B., Smart, K., & Strom, S. (2024). Synergizing perspectives: A dual student-instructor partnership in transforming STEM recitation experiences in large enrollment courses. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(2), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5759
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Human Anatomy and Physiology Society (HAPS). (2019). HAPS A&P learning outcomes. https://www.hapsweb.org/haps-learning-outcomes/haps-ap-learning-outcomes-los/
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Modi, P., Yeschin, M., & McLean, S. (2024). Digital media interns: Students as partners for technology support and educational innovation. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5601
Riddell, J., Gadoury-Sansfaçon, G. P., & Stoddard, S. (2021). Building institutional capacities for students as partners in the design of COVID classrooms. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4603
Tsui, E., Dragicevic, N., Fan, I., & Cheng, M. (2024). Co-creating curriculum with students, teachers, and practitioners in a technology-enhanced environment. Educational Technology Research & Development, 72, 869–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10301-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Beatriz Castro, Carla Hernandez, Ayush Bansal, Alana Diedrick
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
