Students as partners for learning analytics
How students want their data to be used
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v10i1.6766Keywords:
Student As Partners, Learning Analytics, Student Voices, Data Privacy, Student DataAbstract
While learning analytics has shown promise to enhance student learning, culturally specific ethical considerations on how students would like their data to be used need to be investigated and included in institutional implementation. This joint study with student researchers from both a United Kingdom-based and an Asian university employed mixed approaches to understand how students 1) use data for learning, 2) view data privacy, and 3) perceive the usefulness of learning analytics for enhancing their student experience. We found that most students in both contexts are concerned about privacy and would like clarity and autonomy over what, how, and with whom their data are shared. In addition, the paper presents the reflections on working with students as partners, identifies this approach as an essential and effective way to enculturate students in data ethics and to gather authentic, context-specific student voices to shape policies around learning analytics.
Downloads
References
Allin, L. (2014). Collaboration between staff and students in the scholarship of teaching and learning: The potential and the problems. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 2(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.2.1.95
Alzahrani, A. S., Tsai, Y. S., Iqbal, S., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Kloos, C. D., Aljohani, N., & Gašević, D. (2023). Untangling connections between challenges in the adoption of learning analytics in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4563–4595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11323-x
Bovill, C., Jarvis, J., & Mpamhanga, K. (2020). Co-creating learning and teaching: Towards relational pedagogy in higher education. Critical Publishing.
Bryant, C., Lee, L. E., & Levin, B. (1997, March). Developing student voice: A follow-up study with students as researchers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Cano, A., & Leonard, J. D. (2019). Interpretable multiview early warning system adapted to underrepresented student populations. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2019.2911079
Cerratto Pargman, T., & McGrath, C. (2021). Mapping the ethics of learning analytics in higher education: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.1
Clark, J. A., Liu, Y., & Isaias, P. (2020). Critical success factors for implementing learning analytics in higher education: A mixed-method inquiry. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6164
Davis, C., & Sakr, M. (2021). Student researchers: Potentials and challenges. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 3(2), 74–91. https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/1007
Dollinger, M., & Lodge, J. (2019). What learning analytics can learn from students as partners. Educational Media International, 56(3), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1669883
Dollinger, M., Tai, J., Jorre St Jorre, T., Ajjawi, R., Krattli, S., Prezioso, D., & McCarthy, D. (2023). Student partners as co-contributors in research: A collective autoethnographic account. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(6), 1377–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2139359
Francis, M., Avoseh, M., Card, K., Newland, L., & Streff, K. (2023). Student privacy and learning analytics: Investigating the application of privacy within a student success information system in higher education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(3), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7975
Gibson, J. P., & Mourad, T. (2018). The growing importance of data literacy in life science education. American Journal of Botany, 105(12), 1953–1956. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26617166
Guzmán-Valenzuela, C., Gómez-González, C., Rojas-Murphy Tagle, A., & Lorca-Vyhmeister, A. (2021). Learning analytics in higher education: A preponderance of analytics but very little learning? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00258-x
Herodotou, C., Hlosta, M., Boroowa, A., Rienties, B., Zdrahal, Z., & Mangafa, C. (2019). Empowering online teachers through predictive learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3064–3079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09685-0
Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity Press.
Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 923–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9477-y
Jones, K. M. L., Asher, A., Goben, A., Perry, M. R., Salo, D., Briney, K. A., & Robertshaw, M. B. (2020a). “We’re being tracked at all times”: Student perspectives of their privacy in relation to learning analytics in higher education. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(9), 1044–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24358
Jones, K. M. L., Rubel, A., & LeClere, E. (2020b). A matter of trust: Higher education institutions as information fiduciaries in an age of educational data mining and learning analytics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(10), 1227–1241. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24327
Kaur, A. (2020). Students as partners: Challenges and opportunities in the Asian context. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i2.4366
Knight, S., Gibson, A., & Shibani, A. (2020). Implementing learning analytics for learning impact: Taking tools to task. The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100729
Kollom, K., Tammets, K., Scheffel, M., Tsai, Y. S., Jivet, I., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Ruiz Calleja, A., Gašević, D., Delgado Kloos, C., Drachsler, H., & Ley, T. (2021). A four-country cross-case analysis of academic staff expectations about learning analytics in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100788
Lai, J. W., Qiu, W., Thway, M., Zhang, L., Jamil, N. B., Su, C. L., Ng, S. S. H., & Lim, F. S. (2025). Leveraging process-action epistemic network analysis to illuminate student self-regulated learning with a Socratic chatbot. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8549
Li, W., Sun, K., Schaub, F., & Brooks, C. (2022). Disparities in students’ propensity to consent to learning analytics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 564–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00254-2
Liu, Q., & Khalil, M. (2023). Understanding privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics using a systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 1715–1747. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13388
Mandinach, E. B., & Abrams, L. M. (2022). Data literacy and learning analytics. In C. Lang, A. F. Wise, A. Merceron, D. Gašević, & G. Siemens (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 196–204). Society for Learning Analytics Research. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla22.019
Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12459803
Márquez, L., Henríquez, V., Chevreux, H., Scheihing, E., & Guerra, J. (2024). Adoption of learning analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13385
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Michos, K., Schmitz, M. L., & Petko, D. (2023). Teachers’ data literacy for learning analytics: A central predictor for digital data use in upper secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14453–14471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11772-y
Mihans, R., Long, D., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216
Mutimukwe, C., Viberg, O., Oberg, L. M., & Cerratto-Pargman, T. (2022). Students’ privacy concerns in learning analytics: Model development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 932–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13234
Ndukwe, I. G., & Daniel, B. K. (2020). Teaching analytics, value and tools for teacher data literacy: A systematic and tripartite approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00201-6
Pangrazio, L., Auld, G., Lynch, J., Sawatzki, C., Duffy, G., Hannigan, S., & O’Mara, J. (2024). Data justice in education: Toward a research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2320196
Prinsloo, P., Slade, S., & Khalil, M. (2022). The answer is (not only) technological: Considering student data privacy in learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 876–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13216
Qiu, W., Su, C. L., Jamil, N. B., Thway, M., Ng, S. S. H., Zhang, L., Lim, F. S., & Lai, J. W. (2025). A systematic approach to evaluate the use of chatbots in educational contexts: Learning gains, engagements and perceptions. Computers, 14(7), 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14070270
Raffaghelli, J. E. (2020). Is data literacy a catalyst of social justice? A response from nine data literacy initiatives in higher education. Education Sciences, 10(9), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090233
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). (2016). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 1–88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
Reitmaier Koehler, A., Reveling Smith, L., Davies, S., & Mangan-Danckwart, D. (2015). Partners in research: Developing a model for undergraduate faculty-student collaboration. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2015-0029
Rets, I., Herodotou, C., Bayer, V., Hlosta, M., & Rienties, B. (2021). Exploring critical factors of the perceived usefulness of a learning analytics dashboard for distance university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00284-9
Sclater, N. (2016). Developing a code of practice for learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.3
Torres Castro, U. E., & Pineda-Báez, C. (2023). How has the conceptualisation of student agency in higher education evolved? Mapping the literature from 2000–2022. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(9), 1182–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2231358
Tsai, Y. S., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Tammets, K., Kollom, K., & Gašević, D. (2018). SHEILA policy framework: Informing institutional strategies and policy processes of learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 320–329). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170367
Tsai, Y. S., Perrotta, C., & Gašević, D. (2020a). Empowering learners with personalised learning approaches? Agency, equity and transparency in the context of learning analytics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396
Tsai, Y. S., Rates, D., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Delgado Kloos, C., & Gašević, D. (2020b). Learning analytics in European higher education—Trends and barriers. Computers & Education, 155, 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933
Tzimas, D., & Demetriadis, S. (2021). Ethical issues in learning analytics: A review of the field. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1101–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09977-4
Ungras, O., Brockett, G., Bamperineza, S., Belius, M., Bordbar, A., Brownstein, A., & Webster, B. (2024). Voices from the field: Equipping student leaders as partners for sustainable humanitarian action. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5702
Viberg, O., Engström, L., Saqr, M., & Hrastinski, S. (2022). Exploring students’ expectations of learning analytics: A person-centered approach. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8561–8581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10980-2
Viberg, O., Kizilcec, R. F., Jivet, I., Martínez Monés, A., Oh, A., Mutimukwe, C., Hrastinski, S., & Scheffel, M. (2024). Cultural differences in students’ privacy concerns in learning analytics across Germany, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the United States. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100416
Welikala, T., & Atkin, C. (2014). Student co-inquirers: The challenges and benefits of inclusive research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.909402
West, D., Luzeckyj, A., Toohey, D., Vanderlelie, J., & Searle, B. (2020). Do academics and university administrators really know better? The ethics of positioning student perspectives in learning analytics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4653
Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Tsai, Y. S., Drachsler, H., Scheffel, M., & Gašević, D. (2021). An exploratory latent class analysis of student expectations towards learning analytics services. The Internet and Higher Education, 51, 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100818
Wollny, S., Di Mitri, D., Jivet, I., Muñoz-Merino, P., Scheffel, M., Schneider, J., Tsai, Y. S., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Gašević, D., & Drachsler, H. (2023). Students’ expectations of learning analytics across Europe. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(4), 1325–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12802
Xing, W., & Wang, X. H. (2022). Understanding students’ effective use of data in the age of big data in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(12), 2560–2577. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1936176
Zhan, C., Joksimović, S., Ladjal, D., Rakotoarivelo, T., Marshall, R., & Pardo, A. (2024). Preserving both privacy and utility in learning analytics. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1615–1627. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3393766
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fun Siong Lim, Akshay Anil, Megha Goel, Maryam Fetanat, Meng Xuan Dominic Lai, Varsha Otta, Reyan Thong, Charlotte Whitaker, Yong Han Nicholas Yeo, Camille Kandiko Howson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
