Five guiding principles for navigating artificial intelligence in students as partners practice to preserve pedagogical trust
Navigating artificial intelligence in students as partners practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i2.6871Keywords:
AI, trust, pedagogical partnership, generative AI, principlesDownloads
References
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337
Bearman, M., Fawns, T., Corbin, T., Henderson, M., Liang, Y., Oberg, G., Walton, J., & Matthews, K. E. (in press). Time, emotions and moral judgements: How university students position AI within their study. Higher Education Research & Development.
Botsman, R. (2017). Who can you trust? How technology brought us together and why it could drive us apart. Penguin.
Cook-Sather, A. (2025). “The virtues of not knowing”: How “unknowingness” in pedagogical partnership prepares student partners to navigate complexity, uncertainty, and change in pursuit of equity. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2482802
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Cook-Sather, A., Hong, E., Moss, T., & Williamson, A. (2021). Developing new faculty voice and agency through trustful, overlapping, faculty-faculty and student-faculty conversations. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1947296
Chung, J., Henderson, M., Slade, C., Liang, Y., Pepperell, N., Corbin, T., Walton, J., Yu, A. S., Bearman, M., Buckingham Shum, S., Fawns, T., McCluskey, T., McLean, J., Oberg, G., Seligmann, A., Shibani, A., Bakharia, A., Lim, L. A., & Matthews, K. E. (2025). The use and usefulness of GenAI in higher education: Student experience and perspectives. Manuscript submitted for publication..
Debelius, M., Chehak, M., Le, K., Oh, S., Lyons, S., Kim, G., Nutting, H., & Holtschlag, J. (2025). Designing an AI policy: An experiment in co-creation. International Journal for Students as Partners, 9(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5836
Enright, E., Coll, L., Ní Chróinín, D., & Fitzpatrick, M. (2016). Student voice as risky praxis: Democratising physical education teacher education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(5), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1225031
Felten, P. (2017). Emotion and partnerships. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3070
Felten, P., & Forsyth, R. (2025). Learning and teaching with AI. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 57(3), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2025.2496117
Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472
Henderson, M., Bearman, M., Chung, J., Fawns, T., Buckingham Shum, S., Matthews, K. E., & de Mello Heredia, J. (2025). Comparing generative AI and teacher feedback: Student perceptions of usefulness and trustworthiness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2502582
Hermsen, T., Kuiper, T., Roelofs, F., & van Wijchen, J. (2017). Without emotions, never a partnership! International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3228
Jenness, S. (2013). Being comfortable with uncertainty. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(9), 1–3. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss9/9
Jensen, L. X., Buhl, A., Sharma, A., & Bearman, M. (2025). Generative AI and higher education: A review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT. Higher Education, 89(4), 1145–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01265-3
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Oberg, G., & Liang, Y. (2024, December 3). Assumption: Students love AI. Future Campus. https://futurecampus.com.au/2024/12/03/assumption-students-love-ai/
Oberg, G., Liang, Y., Bearman, M., Fawns, T., Henderson, M., & Matthews, K. E. (2025). Feeling AI: Circulating emotions, institutional climates, and moral boundaries in student use of AI. Manuscript submitted for publication..
Tan, E. (2023). Partnership in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(39), 1–5. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss39/3
University of Sydney. (2023, August 14). Meet the students who developed an educational resource on generative AI. https://www.sydney.edu.au/study/student-life/student-news/2023/08/14/meet-the-students-who-developed-an-educational-resource-on-generative-ai.html
Williams, A., & Ingle, E. (2025). Assessment design through co-creation: Student-staff partnership in evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence. International Journal for Students as Partners, 9(1), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802
Zhang, M., Matthews, K. E., & Liu, S. (2025). When engaging students as partners fails: The ease of maintaining the status quo. Studies in Higher Education. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2552826
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kelly E Matthews

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).