Balancing risk and recovery

  • Gary A Chaimowitz McMaster University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences & St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Forensic Psychiatry Program

Abstract

This Editorial introduces the first issue of the International Journal of Risk and Recovery. The fine balance of risk and recovery in Forensic Psychiatry and more generaly in Mental Health is discussed. It is written by Gary Chaimowitz, Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Head of Forensic Psychiatry Program at St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton in Canada, and Editor in Chief of the journal.

References

1. Simpson A, Penney S. The recovery paradigm in forensic mental health services. Crim Behav Ment Health 2011;21(5):299-306

2. Glancy G, Chaimowitz G. The clinical use of risk assessment. Can J Psychiatry 2005;50(1):12-17

3. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Lavis J, Hill S, Squires J. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 2012;7(1):50

4. Aga N, Vander Laenen F, Vandevelde S, Vermeersch E, Vanderplasschen W. Recovery of offenders formerly labeled as not criminally responsible: uncovering the ambiguity from first-person narratives. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2017 in press

5. Livingston J. What does success look like in the forensic mental health system? Perspectives of service users and service providers. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2016 in press

6. Shepherd A, Doyle M, Sanders C, Shaw J. Personal recovery within forensic settings – Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative methods studies. Crim Behav Ment Health 2016;26(1):59-75

7. Barnao M, Ward T, Robertson P. The Good Lives Model: a new paradigm for forensic mental health. Psychiatr Psychol Law 2016;23(2):288-301
Published
2018-01-31