Criminal court ordered assessments in France and Canada

A comparison

Auteurs-es

  • Sebastien S Prat McMaster University & St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-7850
  • Noemie Praud McMaster University & St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
  • Lauren Barney St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijrr.v1i2.3562

Mots-clés :

Assessment, France, Canada, Criminal court ordered assessment, Comparison, Criminal court

Résumé

In this Letter to the Editor, we aim to compare the Canadian and the French forensic psychiatry system. Comparing both systems is interesting because France is considered as one of the oldest modern justice systems, and many of the forensic concept are inherited from it or its European neighbours. On the other hand, Canada is one of the countries where the modern forensic psychiatry is born, implementing the actual scientific concepts of criminology. Although the overall goal of the Justicer system and Forensic Psychiatry is the same in both countries, the theoritecal and practical differences help each professional to reflect on their own practice in their jurisdiction.

Références

Dainow J. The civil law and the common law: some points of comparison. Am J Compara-tive Law 1966;15(3):419-35.

Girard P. L’évolution du rôle des juges. Les Cahiers de Droit 2001;42(3):361-71.

Canadian Criminal Code, L.R.C. (1985) ch. C-46 (last amended on December 12, 2017). (accessed on May 15, 2018)

Loi n° 2014-896 du 15 août 2014 relative à l'individualisation des peines et renforçant l'ef-ficacité des sanctions pénales. JORF n° 0189 du 17 aout 2014. (accessed on May 15, 2018)

Salas D. La responsabilisation des fous cri-minels à l’ère néolibérale. Inf Psychiatr 2012; 88(6):423-29.

Loi n° 2008-174 du 25 février 2008 relative à la rétention de sûreté et à la déclaration d'irresponsabilité pénale pour cause de trouble mental. JORF n°0048 du 26 février 2008. (accessed on May 15, 2018)

Michaud C., Prat SS. The New Actor of In-voluntary Hospitalisation in France: The Juge des Libertés et de la Détention (Judge of Freedoms and Detention). Psychiatr Psychol Law 2015; 22(5):769-79.

Vanderstukken O, Lacambre M. Dangerosité, prédictivité et échelles actuarielles : confu-sion ou détournement ? Inf Psychiatr 2011; 87(7): 549-5.

Publié-e

2018-06-06

Comment citer

Prat, S. S., Praud, N., & Barney, L. (2018). Criminal court ordered assessments in France and Canada: A comparison. International Journal of Risk and Recovery, 1(2), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijrr.v1i2.3562

Numéro

Rubrique

Letter to the Editor

Articles les plus lus du,de la,des même-s auteur-e-s