“Best of both worlds”: A students-as-partners near-peer moderation program improves student engagement in a course Facebook group
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3693Keywords:
social media, Facebook, peer support, students as partnersAbstract
Social media platforms like Facebook are designed to facilitate online communication and networking, primarily around content posted by users. As such, these technologies are being considered as potential enhancements to traditional learning environments. However, various barriers to effective use may arise. Our research investigated the effectiveness of a students-as-partners near-peer moderation project, arising from collaboration between instructors and senior students, as a vehicle for enhancing student interaction in a Facebook group associated with a large introductory science course. The quantity and quality of sample posts and comments from Facebook groups from three successive academic years were evaluated using a rubric that considered characteristics such as civility, content accuracy, critical thinking and psychological support. Two of these groups were moderated by near-peer students while the third group was not moderated. We found improved course discussion associated with moderated groups in addition to benefits to moderators and the faculty partner. This suggests that near-peer moderation programs working in collaboration with faculty may increase student engagement in social media platforms.
Downloads
References
Alhabash, S, & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media + Society, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691544
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Côté, L., & Leclère, H. (2000). How clinical teachers perceive the doctor-patient relationship and themselves as role models. Academic Medicine, 75(11), 1117-1124. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200011000-00020
Chugh, R., & Ruhi, O. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9621-2
Cruess, S. R., Cruess, R. L., & Steinert, Y. (2008). Teaching Rounds: Role modelling—Making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. British Medical Journal, 336(7646), 718-721. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39503.757847.BE
DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., Koehleer, M. & Francis, A. (2009). Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for Discussions in an Online Course Enhance Perceived Social Presence and Student Interaction? In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 329-336). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/30612/
DiVall, M., & Kirwin J. (2012). Using Facebook to facilitate discussion between students and faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 76(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe76232
Freyn, A. (2017). Experimenting with Snapchat in a university EFL classroom. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(10), 35-37. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1139728.pdf
Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update 2016. Retrieved from Pew Research Center Internet & Technology website: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
Healy, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf
Irwin, C., Ball, L., & Desbrow, B. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221-1232. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9df3/bc2be722869cd7de3da8805212fb6867f6e0.pdf
Legaree, B. A. (2015). Considering the changing face of social media in higher education. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 362(16), 301-303. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnv128
Manca, S. & Ranieri, M. (2015). “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social media in academic practices. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.004
Manca, S. & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education, 95, 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners. 1(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
McCole, D., Everett, M., & Rivera, J. (2014). Integrating Facebook into the college classroom: student perceptions and recommendations for faculty. NACTA Journal, 58(3), 244-249. https://www.jstor.org/stable/nactajournal.58.3.244?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
O’Shea, S., Bennett, S., & Delahunty, J. (2017). Engaging “students as partners” in the design and development of a peer mentoring program. Student Success, 8(2), 113-116. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i2.390
Rivers, J., Smith, A., Higgins, D., Mills, R., Maier, A., & Howitt, S. (2017). Asking and answering questions: Partners, peer learning, and participation. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3072
Schroeder, J., & Greenbowe, T. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry laboratory. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(4). http://www.learntechlib.org/j/IJOE/v/5/n/4/
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024
Soluk, L., & Buddle, C. M. (2015). Tweets from the forest: Using Twitter to increase student engagement in an undergraduate field biology course. F1000Research, 4(82), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6272.1
Thompson, J. (2007). Is education 1.0 ready for web 2.0 students? Journal of Online Education, 3(4), Article 5. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol3/iss4/5
Vaughan, N., Clampitt, K., & Park, N. (2016). To teach is to learn twice: The power of peer mentoring. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.7
Wang, Q., Woo, H., Quek, C., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x
Wang, Y., Fang, W.-C., Han, J., & Chen, N.-S. (2016). Exploring the affordances of WeChat for facilitating teaching, social and cognitive presence in semi-synchronous language exchange. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2640
Weller, S., Domarkaite, G.K., Lam, J., Lam, C., & Metta, L.U. (2013) Student-faculty co-inquiry into student reading: recognising SoTL as pedagogic practice. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070209
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
