Departmental action teams: Empowering students as change agents in academic departments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i1.3869

Keywords:

cultural change, departmental action teams, systemic change, STEM education

Abstract

Supporting and sustaining positive educational change is an area of increasing focus in higher education and remains a persistent challenge. Using student partnerships is one promising way to help promote these much-needed changes. This case study focuses on Departmental Action Teams (DATs), which are groups of faculty, students, and staff working together in the same department to make sustainable improvements to undergraduate education. Here we focus on DATs from four different departments, across two research-intensive universities in the USA, to draw attention to the important roles that students play as change agents in these groups. We also reflect upon the inherent challenges in building partnerships that incorporate meaningful power sharing to effect educational change

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2014). Achieving systemic change: A sourcebook for advancing and funding undergraduate STEM education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges & Universities.
Austin, A. E. (2011). Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Beach, A. L., Henderson, C., & Finkelstein, N. (2012). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(6), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2012.728955
Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies: Increasing evidence-based teaching in STEM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040
Dunne, E., & Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as change agents—New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. Bristol, UK: A Joint University of Exeter/ESCalate/HE Academy Publication.
Hammer, D., & van Zee, E. (2006). Seeing the science in children’s thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in Physical Science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Healey, M. (2016). Students as partners and change agents. Howden, UK: Healey HE Consultants.
Hornsby, K., & Simkins, S. (2017). Wabash-Provost Scholars Program. Retrieved from https://wpscholars.wordpress.com/
Kezar, A. (2011). What is the best way to achieve broader reach of improved practices in higher education? Innovative Higher Education, 36(4), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9174-z
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine Students as Partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (pp. 32-62). New York, NY: Oxford.
Quan, G. M., Corbo, J. C., Falkenberg, K., Finkelstein, N., Geanious, C., Ngai, C., Pawlak, A., Pilgrim, M. E., Reinholz, D. L., Smith, C., & Wise, S. (2019). Designing for institutional transformation: Six principles for department-level interventions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010141. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010141
Rainey, K., Corbo, J. C., Reinholz, D. L., & Betterton, M. (2016). Improving representation in physical sciences using a Departmental Action Team. In D. L. Jones, L. Ding, & A. Traxler (Eds.), 2016 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 264-267). https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2016.pr.061
Reinholz, D. L., & Apkarian, N. (2018). Four frames for systemic change in STEM departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0103-x
Reinholz, D. L., Corbo, J. C., Dancy, M., & Finkelstein, N. (2017). Departmental Action Teams: Supporting faculty learning through departmental change. Learning Communities Journal, 9, 5-32.
Reinholz, D. L., Ngai, C., Quan, G., Pilgrim, M. E., Corbo, J. C., & Finkelstein, N. (2019). Fostering sustainable improvements in science education: An analysis through four frames. Science Education, 103(5), 1125-1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21526
Robertson, A. D. (2015). Valuing student ideas morally, instrumentally, and intellectually. In A. Churukian, D. L. Jones, & L. Ding (Eds.), 2015 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, (pp. 275-278). http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/perc.2015.pr.064
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-09

How to Cite

Reinholz, D. L., Pawlak, A., Ngai, C., & Pilgrim, M. (2020). Departmental action teams: Empowering students as change agents in academic departments. International Journal for Students As Partners, 4(1), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i1.3869

Issue

Section

Case Studies