Undergraduates as course creators: Reflections on starting and sustaining a student-faculty partnership
Keywords:Students as Partners, course development, co-design, partnerships
We reflect on a grassroots partnership to create a new sophomore seminar, “Precision medicine or privileged medicine?” The course puts students in the driver’s seat to explore problems with inclusiveness and quality of biomedical research. It also emphasizes the relevance of “soft skills”, such as emotional intelligence, to build trust, understand inequities and involve patients as partners to improve research.
After developing the course, we felt our experience could interest students and faculty interested in pedagogical co-design, especially where this is not supported by a specific initiative. Ours was a multi-year partnership spearheaded by a sophomore, a senior and a volunteer adjunct associate professor. While we made important use of existing university programs, there was no umbrella initiative or overall sponsor to support student-faculty partnerships from first ideas through new course implementation. This meant we operated with both uncertainty and creativity regarding process, continuity and funding.
In this essay we reflect on experiences that formed and facilitated our partnership, from our first conversations through course approval. We look at how our partnership became one of pedagogical co-design and shaped an inclusive, real-world problem-oriented course for undergraduates. Our reflections may help students interested in teaching and course development looking to develop relationships with faculty members in which they feel heard and valued. Furthermore, we hope to encourage faculty members looking to create a course that prioritizes student experience, goals, and feedback, through development of collaborative and mutually beneficial partnerships with undergraduates.
Campbell, R.K., Tori, K. & Spencer, B. (2018). BIOL-0940E: Precision Medicine or Privileged
Medicine? [Course proposal approved by Brown University's College Curriculum Council]. Providence, Rhode Island: Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University. http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/c673-8t78
Deane, K., Delbecque, L., Gorbenko, O., Hamoir, A.M., Hoos, A., Nafria, B., Pakarinen, C., Sargeant, I., Richards, D.P., Skovlund, S.E. & Brooke N. (2019). Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: An international multistakeholder initiative. British Medical Journal Innovations, 5(1), 435–5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmjinnov-2018-000317
Graham, G. N. (2016). Why your ZIP code matters more than your genetic code: Promoting healthy outcomes from mother to child. Breastfeeding Medicine, 11(8), 3963–97. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2016.0113
Hudd, S. S. (2003). Syllabus under construction: Involving students in the creation of class assignments. Teaching Sociology, 31(2), 1952–02. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211308
Rhodes, T. (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using rubrics. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Stanton, T. K. (2008). New times demand new scholarship: Opportunities and challenges for civic engagement at research universities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(1), 194–2. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1746197907086716
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Brooke Spencer, Katerina Tori, Robert Campbell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).