Cultivating student agency and responsibility through peer-to-peer teaching


  • Angela D. Storey University of Louisville
  • Hannah Eckel-Sparrow University of Lousville
  • Henrietta K. Ransdell University of Louisville



student agency, responsibility, peer education, anthropology


This case study explores an eight-semester Peer Educator Program in the Department of Anthropology at the University of Louisville (Kentucky, USA) that trains undergraduates in teaching practices, crafts spaces of partnership, and expands learning within large general education courses. Peer educators self-select from any major and gain knowledge on lesson planning and facilitation, working in small groups to decide content, plan, and teach bonus sessions for introductory courses. We argue that peer-to-peer teaching reworks lines of responsibility within and around classrooms such that student agency is cultivated both for students engaged in partnership activities and those taught by student partners. Peer education thus becomes a hinge around which authority is shifted and the educational agency enacted in Students-as-Partners programs extended to wider student populations. The authors are two undergraduate peer educators and the faculty coordinator.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Angela D. Storey, University of Louisville

Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of Louisville

Hannah Eckel-Sparrow, University of Lousville

Undergraduate student, Department of Anthropology

Henrietta K. Ransdell, University of Louisville

Undergraduate student, Department of Anthropology


Bovill, C. (2019). A co-creation of learning and teaching typology: What kind of co-creation are you planning or doing? International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(2), 91–98.

Bovill, C., & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78, 407–422.

Cook-Sather, A. (2019). Wrestling with the languages and practices of pedagogical partnership. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 27, 1–4.

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Josey-Bass.

Cook-Sather, A., & Luz, A. (2015). Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: What happens when students cross the threshold of student-faculty partnerships. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1097–1109.

Coombe, L., Huang, J., Russell, S., Sheppard, K., & Khosravi, H. (2018) Students as partners in action: Evaluating a university-wide initiative. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 85–95.

Daniello, F., & Acquaviva, C. (2019). A faculty member learning with and from an undergraduate teaching assistant: Critical reflection in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners 3(2): 109–117.

DeJaeghere, J. G., McCleary, K. S., & Josic, J. (2016). Conceptualizing youth agency. In J. G. DeJaeghere, J. Josic, & K. S. McCleary (Eds.), Education and youth agency: Qualitative case studies in global contexts (pp. 1–26). Springer International Publishing.

Dwyer, A. (2018). Toward the formation of genuine partnership spaces. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 11–15.

Dyson, M. (2007). My story in a profession of stories: Auto ethnography – an empowering methodology for educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 36–48.

Felton, P., Abbot, S., Kirkwood, J., Long, A., Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Verwoord, R. (2019). Reimagining the place of students in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(2), 192–203.

Goff, L., & Knorr, K. (2018). Three heads are better than one: Students, faculty, and educational developers as co-developers of science curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners 2(1), 112–120.

Leder, S., Plotnik, M., & Venkateswaran, P. (1999). Changing concepts of activism in women’s studies: Women’s studies in a community college. Women’s Studies Quarterly, (3&4), 185–202.

Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2019). “More than just a student”: How curriculum co-creation fosters third spaces in ways of working, identity, and impact. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 1–16.

Manor, C., Block-Schulman, S., Flannery, K., & Felten, P. (2010). Foundations of student-faculty partnerships in the scholarship of teaching and learning. In C. Werder & M. M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging students voices in the study of teaching and learning (pp. 3–15). Stylus.

Mercer-Mapstron, L, Dvorakavoa, S.L., Matthews, K.E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swain, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners 1(1), 1–23.

Ntem, A., & Cook-Sather, A. (2018). Resistance and resiliencies in pedagogical partnership: Student partners’ perspectives. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 82–96.

Starr, L. J. (2010). The use of auto-ethnography in educational research: Locating who we are in what we do. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 3(1), 1–9.

Trahar, S. (2013). Autoethnographic journeys in learning and teaching in higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 367–375.

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). Josey-Bass.




How to Cite

Storey, A. D., Eckel-Sparrow, H., & Ransdell, H. K. (2021). Cultivating student agency and responsibility through peer-to-peer teaching. International Journal for Students As Partners, 5(1), 97–106.



Case Studies