Student-staff partnership in India: A future possibility within contested terrain?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i2.5142Keywords:
students as partners, student-staff partnership, Indian higher education, Indian students, global perspectivesAbstract
Existing literature on named “students-as-partners” (SaP) practices suggest that these practices are still in their embryonic stage in Southeast Asia. In addition, the literature on SaP that supports it as a global practice has not examined the suitability of student partnership (SP) practices in Indian higher education (HE) yet. It is here that this paper seeks to contribute by examining Indian students with experiences in being a student partner in an Australian university to reflect on the challenges and possibilities in relation to implementing these practices in Indian HE. Adopting a postcolonial theoretical frame, this paper examines empirical evidence from an informal group discussion among six Indian collaborators. The data, analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis suggested by Braun and Clarke (2019), provide four interrelated themes that focus on the suitability of these practices in India intertwined with the inherent challenges. The study argues in favour of context-specific adaptation of the practice. Through the Indian students’ experiences, it adds to the ongoing conversations about knowing and understanding SaP in new ways and about positioning students as knowledgeable individuals, which is at the core of partnership practices. By bringing the voices of Indian students to the fore, this article argues in favour of embodying SaP as culturally relevant or a decolonising practice.
Downloads
References
Abbott, A., & Silles, M. (2016). Determinants of international student migration. The World Economy, 39(5), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12319
Alva, A., & Hans, V. (2013). Higher education in India—Opportunities, changes and challenges. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2203706
Batra, P. (2005). Voice and agency of teachers: Missing link in national curriculum framework 2005. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(40), 4347–4356. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4417232
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Bindra, G., Easwaran, K., Firasta, L., Hirsch, M., Kapoor, A., Sosnowski, A., Stec-Marksman, T., & Vatansever, G. (2018). Increasing representation and equity in students as partners initiatives. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3536
Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: A new trend or an old idea we never got around to implementing? In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving learning through research and scholarship: 20 years of ISL (pp. 96–108). The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/82348/1/82348.pdf
Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.770264
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, courses design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Brinkmann, S. (2015). Learner-centred education reforms in India: The missing piece of teachers’ beliefs. Policy Futures in Education, 13(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315569038
Brinkmann, S. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs and educational reform in India: From “learner-centred” to “learning-centred” education. Comparative Education, 55(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1541661
Cook-Sather, A. (2015). Dialogue across differences of position, perspective, and identity: Reflective practice in/on a student-faculty pedagogical partnership program. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700204
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). What are student-faculty partnerships? Our guiding principles and definition. In Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty (pp.1–14). John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Cook-Sather, A., Matthews, K. E., Ntem, A., & Leathwick, S. (2018). What we talk about when we talk about students as partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3790
Cookson, P. S. (2002). The hybridization of higher education: Cross national perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v2i2.66
Frison, D. & Melacarne, C. (2017). Introduction—Students-faculty partnership in Italy: Approaches, practices, and perspectives. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(20). http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss20/1
Gärdebo, J. & Wiggberg, M. (2012). Importance of student participation in future academia. In J. Gärdebo & M.Wiggberg (Eds.), Students, the university’s unspent resource: Revolutionising higher education using active student participation, 7–14. Uppsala
University: Division for Development of Teaching and Learning.
Green, W. (2019). Stretching the cultural-linguistic boundaries of “students as partners.” International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3791
Guitman, R., Acai, A., & Mercer-Mapstone, L. (2020). Unlearning hierarchies and striving for relational diversity a feminist manifesto for student-staff partnerships. In L. Mercer-Mapstone & S. Abbot (Eds.), The power of partnership (pp. 61–72.) Elon University, Centre for Engaged Learning.
Gupta, M., & Pandey, J. (2018). Impact of student engagement on affective learning: Evidence from a large Indian university. Current Psychology, 37, 414-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9522-3
Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). 'It depends': Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Hill, S., & Chalaux, T. (2011). Improving access and quality in the Indian education system (Economics Department Working Paper No. 885). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.980.4402&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Jayaram, N. (Ed.). (2004). The Indian diaspora: Dynamics of migration. SAGE Publications India.
Johnson, A. (1996). “It’s good to talk”: The focus group and the sociological imagination. The Sociological Review, 44(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1996.tb00435.x
Kumar, P., Sarkar, S., & Sharma, R. (2009). Migration and diaspora formation: Mobility of Indian students to developed countries. International Migration and Diaspora Studies, IMDS Working Paper Series, 8, 29–45. Retrieved from Jawaharlal Nehru University Library http://lib.jnu.ac.in/sites/default/files/pdf/imds_p/IMDS_May_2009_WP_8.pdf
Kumar, V. (2013). Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities in Higher Education System in India. Delhi Business Review, 14(2), 29–42. Retrieved from https://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en/
Kupatadze, K. (2018). Course redesign with student-faculty partnership: A reflection on opportunities and vulnerabilities. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(24), 2. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1184&context=tlthe
Liang, Y., & Matthews, K. E. (2021). Students as partners practices and theorisations in Asia: A scoping review. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1773771
Manathunga, C. (2020). Decolonising higher education: Creating space for Southern knowledge systems. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, 4(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v4i1.138
Marquis, E., Jayaratnam, A., Mishra, A., & Rybkina, K. (2018). “I feel like some students are better connected”: Students’ perspectives on applying for extracurricular partnership opportunities. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3300
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine “students as partners” practice. International Journal of Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., & Healey, M. (2018). Connecting learning, teaching, and research through student-staff partnerships: Toward universities as egalitarian learning communities. In V. Tong, A. Standen, & M. Sotiriou (Eds.), Shaping higher education with students: Ways to connect research and teaching (pp. 23–29). University College of London Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21c4tcm
Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., Acai, A., Dvorakova, S. L., Felten, P., Marquis, E., & Mercer-Mapstone, L. (2018). Toward theories of partnership praxis: An analysis of interpretive framing in literature on students as partners in teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 280–293. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/edu_pubs/40/
McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co‐producer: Learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802562857
Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). (2020). National education policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
Neary, M. (2012). Student as producer: An institution of the common? [or how to recover communist/revolutionary science]. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 4(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2012.04030003
Parliament of Australia. (2021). Overseas students in Australian higher education: A quick guide. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp2021/Quick_Guides/OverseasStudents
Pounder, J. S., Ho, E. H., & Groves, J. M. (2015). Faculty-student engagement in teaching observation and assessment: A Hong Kong initiative. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1071779
Quayson, A. (2000). Postcolonialism and postmodernism. A companion to postcolonial studies, 87-111.
Ramaswamy, H. H. S., & Kumar, S. (2022). A critical analysis of unsustainable higher education internationalisation policies in developing economies. Policy Futures in Education, 20(4), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210321999186
Rizvi, F. (2016). Privatization in education: Trends and consequences (Working Paper: Education Research and Foresight). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12799/5066/Privatization%20in%20Education%20Trends%20and%20Consequences.pdf?sequence=1
Rizvi, F., & Gorur, R. (2011). Challenges facing Indian higher education. The Fearless Nadia Occasional Papers on India–Australia Relations, Australia India Institute, Melbourne, 34–56.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Routledge
Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Lavia, J. (2006). Postcolonialism and education: Negotiating a contested terrain. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 14(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360600891852
Said, E. W. (1997). Beginnings: Intention and method. Granta books.
Saravanakumar, A. R. (2014). Present scenario and future prospects of higher education in India. Proceeding of the Social Sciences Research ICSSR, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, MALAYSIA.
Saravanakumar, A. R., & Padmini Devi, K. R. (2020). Indian higher education: Issues and opportunities. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(2), 542–545. Retrieved from www.jceview.com
Seth, S. (2007). Subject lessons: The Western education of colonial India. Duke University Press.
Sofyan, M., Barnes, M., & Finefter-Rosenbluh, I. (2021). Teacher effectiveness in Asian higher education contexts: A systematic review. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1952567
Sperduti, V. R. (2017). Internationalization as westernization in higher education. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 9 (Spring), 9-12. Retrieved from https://www.ojed.org/index.php/jcihe/article/view/887
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). MacMillan Publications.
Taylor, P., & Wilding, D. (2009). Rethinking the values of higher education: The student as collaborator and producer? Undergraduate research as a case study. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/433/2/Undergraduate.pdf
Tiwari, R., Anjum B., & Khurana, A. (2013). Role of private sector in Indian higher education, GALAXY International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 1(2), 75–83. Retrieved from https://internationaljournals.co.in/index.php/giirj/issue/view/2
Viswanadhan, K. G., Rao, N. J., & Mukhopadhyay, C. (2005, January 3–6). A framework for measuring the quality of undergraduate engineering education programmes in India. In Proc. Hawaii Inter. Conf. on Educ (pp. 4938–4953).
Yeravdekar, V. R., & Tiwari, G. (2014). Internationalization of higher education in India: Contribution to regional capacity building in neighbouring countries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 157, 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.042
Zhang, M., Matthews, K., & Liu, S. (2022). Recognising cultural capital through shared meaning-making in cross-cultural partnership practices. International Journal for Students as Partners, 6(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v6i1.4893
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Preeti Vayada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
