‘Trying to open the doors’: The co-creation of digital resources for disadvantaged primary school pupils
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i2.5166Keywords:
co-creation, students as partners, widening participationAbstract
This article explores the use of co-creation as an approach for involving university students in the development of educational initiatives for widening participation (WP) in higher education (HE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. At present, research and guidance looking at how co-creation practices can enable the production of such initiatives within HE is highly limited, which can deter others from employing this approach. To this end, we provide a case study of a WP project called Topic in a Box that involved staff and students working together to produce digital learning material for primary schools and students over several months. Through the use of semi-structured interviews with nine students, this research provides insight into the steps that were taken to develop the project, capturing the motivations, benefits and challenges of co-creation practice from a student perspective. We argue that this mode of co-creation should be used to a greater extent across the university sector and in recognition that university students have much to offer in terms of widening access to university.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, D., & Cairnduff, A. (2012). Inclusion in higher education: Issues in university school partnership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(9), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2011.636235
Atherton J.S. (2013). Learning and Teaching; Constructivism in learning [On-line] UK: retrieved 24 July 2023 from http://acbart.com/learningandteaching/LearningAndTeaching/www.learningandteaching.info/learning/constructivism.html
Atherton, J. S. (2009). Learning and Teaching; Constructivism in learning [On-line] UK: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/constructivism.htm [Accessed 21st July 2021].
Austin, K. (2021) Facing the pandemic: Considering partnerships for widening participation in higher education in Australia. European Journal of Education, 56(1), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12432
Austin, K., & Smith, M. (2020). The WPO ‘pivot’—Shifting widening participation outreach activities to a remote learning environment [Webinar]. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Curtin University, Australia. www.ncsehe.edu.au/event/webinar-widening-participation-outreach-remote-learning/
Austin, M., & Hatt, S. (2005). The messengers are the message: A study of the effects of employing HE student ambassadors to work with school students. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 7(1), 22–29. Retrieved from https://www.ingentaconnect.com
Bennett, A., Southgate, E., & Shah, M. (2015). Global perspectives on widening participation: Approaches and concepts. In M. Shah, A. Bennett, & E. Southgate (Eds.), Widening higher education participation (pp. 241–253). Chandos Publishing.
Bovill, C., and Bulley, C.J. (2011) A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. In: Rust, C. (ed.) Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global Theories and Local Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations. Series: Improving Student Learning (18). Oxford Brookes University: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford, pp. 176-188.
Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.770264
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P. et al. (2016) Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. High Educ 71, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Bowes, L., Evans, J., Nathwani, T., Birkin, G., Boyd, A., Holmes, C., Thomas, L., & Jones, S. H. (2015). Understanding progression into higher education for disadvantaged and under-represented groups: A report by CFE Research for the Department for Business, Innovation, and Skills (BIS Research Paper Number 229). CFE Research. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/474269/BIS-15-462-understanding-progression-into-higher-education-final.pdf
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
Cho, S., Werker, G. R., Liu, A. Y., Moghtader, B., Huh, & W. T. (2020). A three-party case study: Exploring the value of student work in co-creation in teaching and learning. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 8(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.13
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Cullinane, C., & Montacute, R. (2020). COVID-19 and social mobility impact brief #1: School shutdown. The Sutton Trust. https://www.suttontrust.com/our-research/covid-19-and-social-mobility-impact-brief/
Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff-student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463– 477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Delpish, A., Holmes, A., Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., Darby, A., King, K., & Felten, P. (2010). Equalizing voices: Student-faculty partnership in course design. In C. Werder & M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning (pp. 96–114). Sterling: Stylus.
Doyle, E., Buckley, P., & Whelan, J. (2019). Assessment co-creation: An exploratory analysis of opportunities and challenges based on student and instructor perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(6), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1498077
Farenga, S. (2019). Participatory pedagogy in a pandemic: Co-designing a new student experience. (Publication No. 14114190) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hertfordshire]. https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/22568/14114190%20Farenga%20Stephane%20Final%20Version%20of%20EdD%20Submission.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Gale, T., Hattam, R., Parker, S., Comber, B., Bills, D., & Tranter, D. (2010). Interventions early in school as a means to improve higher education outcomes for disadvantaged (particularly low SES) students: Report commissioned by the Department of Education, Employment & Workplace Relations. Commonwealth of Australia.
Gravett S., Petersen N., & Ramsaroop S. (2019). A University and School Working in Partnership to Develop Professional Practice Knowledge for Teaching. Front. Educ. 3:118. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00118
Holmes, H., & Burgess, G. (2022). Digital exclusion and poverty in the UK: How structural inequality shapes experiences of getting online, Digital Geography and Society, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100041
Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Social learning: An introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton University Press.
Kelly, S. (2010). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall & R. de Vries (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative methods in health research. Sage Publications.
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2020). An exploration of how curriculum co-creation advances student and staff aims for Scottish higher education [Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh]. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/37195?show=full
MacDonnell, J. (2016). Inspiring Young Working Class Males: a case study of a Primary School Outreach Project, Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 18(3), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.18.3.55
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, C., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nutt, D. (2013). First contact and admissions – Beginning the journey. In M. Morgan (Ed.), Supporting student diversity in higher education: A practical guide (1st ed.). Routledge.
Nygaard, C., Brand, S., Bartholomew, P., & Millard, L. (Eds.). (2013). Student engagement: Identity, motivation and community. Libri Publishing.
O’Brien. M. (2013). Repositioning the subject discipline for an ‘academic-enhancement’ model of widening participation: A philosophical sketch. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498036
Osborne, M. (2003). Policy and practice in widening participation: A six country comparative study of access as flexibility. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370304826
Pahl, K., & Evans, P. (2018). Virtual centrality: Young people making meaning from research in a widening participation context. Research for All, 2(2), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.02.2.15
Pitman, T., Roberts, L., Bennett, D., & Richardson, S. (2019). An Australian study of graduate outcomes for disadvantaged students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1349895
Prescott, J., & Cross, D., and Iliff, P. (2020). Co-creating real-world research skills. International Journal for Students as Partners. 4. 120-127. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i1.3716
Rainford, J. (2021). Are we still “raising aspirations”? The complex relationship between aspiration and widening participation practices in English higher education institutions. Educational Review, 75(3), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1923461
Rizzica, L. (2020) Raising Aspirations and Higher Education: Evidence from the United Kingdom’s Widening Participation Policy, Journal of Labor Economics, 38(1), 183-214. https://doi.org/10.1086/704571
Roberts, N., & Danechi, S. (2021). Coronavirus: GCSEs, A Levels and equivalents in 2021 and 2022 (Research briefing). House of Commons Library. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9045/
Ruskin, J., & Bilous, R.H. (2021). Engaging stakeholders in work-integrated learning – A sustainable model for curriculum co-creation. In S. J. Ferns, A. D. Rowe, & K. E. Zegwaard (Eds.), Advances in research, theory and practice in work-integrated learning: Enhancing employability for a sustainable future. 5, 49-59. Routledge.
Ryan, A. & Tilbury, D. (2013). Flexible pedagogies: New pedagogical ideas. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/flexible-pedagogies-new-pedagogical-ideas
Sandelowski M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research Nurse Health, 18(2), 179–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211
Siau, K., Nah, F. F.-H., Mennecke, B. E., & Schiller, S. Z. (2010). Co-creation and collaboration in a virtual world. Journal of Database Management, 21(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2010100101
Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Smith, S., Akhyani, K., Axson, D., Arnautu, A., & Stanimirova, I. (2021). The partnership co-creation process: Conditions for success? International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4772
Spence, M., Livingstone, M. B. E., Hollywood, L. E., Gibney, E. R., O’Brien, S. A., Pourshahidi, L. K., & Dean, M. (2013). A qualitative study of psychological, social and behavioral barriers to appropriate food portion size control. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-92
Steinhaus, L., Schields, M., Schrammel, M., & Feichtinger, J. (2018). Guidebook on engagement and co-creation methodologies (D 3.3). Bloom. https://bloom-bioeconomy.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/D3-3_Guidebook-on-engagement-and-co-creation-methods_final.pdfTaylor, Y. (2008). Good students, bad pupils: Constructions of “aspiration”, “disadvantage” and social class in undergraduate‐led widening participation work. Educational Review, 60(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910801934029
Thiele, T., & Homer, D. (2022). ‘It’s not something that I should be ashamed of’: Understanding the challenges and lived experiences of disadvantaged students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Equity in Education & Society, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461221117286
Thiele, T., Pope, D., Singleton, A., Snape, D., & Stanistreet, D. (2017). Experience of disadvantage: The influence of identity on engagement in working class students’ educational trajectories to an elite university. British Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3251
Thomas, L., Bland, D., & Duckworth, V. (2012). Teachers as advocates for widening participation. Widening Participation & Lifelong Learning, 14(2), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.14.2.40
Torfing, J., Ferlie, E. Jukić, T., & Ongaro, E. (2021). A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value. Policy & Politics, 49(2) 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16108172803520
Wakeling, P. (2010). Is there such a thing as a working-class academic? In Y. Taylor (Ed.), Classed intersections: Spaces, selves, knowledges (pp. 36–52). Ashgate.
Watt, L. (2016). Engaging hard to reach families: Learning from five ‘outstanding’ schools. Education, 44(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1122321
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tamara Thiele, Damien Homer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
