Students as co-producers
Establishing the conditions for a successful partnership within an undergraduate research scheme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5385Keywords:
co-producers, research partnerships, shared values, structures and working arrangements, attitudes and behavioursAbstract
To engage students with academic research is recognised as a high-impact activity that supports the development of valuable critical thinking skills. Various approaches have been developed to promote student research both in and outside the curriculum. By incorporating the perspectives of both students and academics, this qualitative study evaluates the extent to which a research partnership is formed through an institutional research scheme called the Junior Research Associate. Our findings indicate that it is critical to move beyond the entrenched academic hierarchies of supervisor/supervisee to develop a negotiated research relationship. Challenges identified include the short timeframe to establish the conditions for successful partnership and differential expectations of partners at the outset of the scheme. It is also important to safeguard against such initiatives being instrumentalised by academics seeking to further their personal research agenda. The findings help to inform strategies to scale up such initiatives.
Downloads
References
Abbott, L. E., Andes, A., Pattani, A. C., & Mabrouk, P. A. (2020). Authorship not taught and not caught in undergraduate research experiences at a research university. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2555–2599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00220-6
Aitken, G., Smith, K., Fawns, T., & Jones, D. (2020). Participatory alignment: A positive relationship between educators and students during online masters dissertation supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1744129
Aitken, G., Smith, K., Fawns, T., & Jones, D. (2022). Participatory alignment: a positive relationship between educators and students during online masters dissertation supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(6), 772–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1744129
Ali, X., Tatam, J., Gravett, K., & Kinchin, I. M. (2021). Partnership values: An evaluation of student-staff research projects at a UK higher education institution. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i1.4354
Blanchard, C., & Haccoun, R. R. (2020). Investigating the impact of advisor support on the perceptions of graduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 1010–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1632825
Bovill, C. (2017). A framework to explore roles within student-staff partnerships in higher education: Which students are partners, when, and in what ways? International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3062
Bovill, C. (2019). A co-creation of learning and teaching typology: What kind of co-creation are you planning or doing? International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3953
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. State University of New York at Stony Brook for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1998
Braun V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 3747. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Cates, R. M., Madigan, M. R., & Reitenauer, V. L. (2018). ‘Locations of possibility’: Critical perspectives on partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3341
Chang, Y., & Ramnanan, C. J. (2015). A review of literature on medical students and scholarly research: Experiences, attitudes, and outcomes. Academic Medicine, 90(8), 1162–1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000702
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
Council on Undergraduate Research. (2021). Mission and history. https://www.cur.org/who/organization/mission_and_vision/
Curran, R., & Millard, L. (2016). A partnership approach to developing student capacity to engage and staff capacity to be engaging: Opportunities for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120212
de Bie, A., Marquis, E., Cook-Sather, A. and Luqueño, L.P. (2019). Valuing knowledge(s) and cultivating confidence: Contributions of student–faculty pedagogical partnerships to epistemic justice. In J. Hoffman, P. Blessinger, & M. Makhanya, M. (Eds.), Strategies for fostering inclusive classrooms in higher education: International perspectives on equity and inclusion (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 16, pp. 35-48). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120190000016004
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 210–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756
Dollinger, M., Tai, J., Jorre St Jorre, T., Ajjawi, R., Krattli, S., Prezioso, D., & McCarthy, D. (2022). Student partners as co-contributors in research: A collective autoethnographic account. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2139359
Dysthe, O. (2002). Professors as mediators of academic text cultures: An interview study with advisors and master’s degree students in three disciplines in a Norwegian university. Written Communication, 19(4), 493–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108802238010
Eady, M. J., & Green, C. (2020). The invisible line: Students as partners or students as colleagues? International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i1.3895
Fung, D. (2017). A connected curriculum for higher education. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781911576358
Grant, B., & Graham, A. (1999). Naming the Game: Reconstructing graduate supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251990040105
Grant, B. M. (2005). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082483
Grenness, T. (2022). “If you don’t cheat, you lose”: An explorative study of business students’ perceptions of cheating behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2116479
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-undergraduate-research-and-inquiry
HESA. (2023).HE student enrolments by subject of study and domicile. DT051 table 52. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/what-studyHealey, M., Marquis, B., & Vajoczki, S. (2013). Exploring SoTL through international collaborative writing groups. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.3
Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities, 14(3), 28–29.
Kushwah, L., & Navrouzoglou, P. (2022). Enhanced student satisfaction through effective supervisor- supervisee allocation: A case study. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v10i1.495
Levy, P. (2009). Inquiry-based learning: A conceptual framework. Centre for Inquiry‐Based Learning in the Arts and Social Sciences, University of Sheffield.
Luo, B., Matthews, K., & Chunduri, P. (2019). “Commitment to collaboration”: What students have to say about the values underpinning partnership practices. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3688
Marie, J., & McGowan, S. (2017). Moving towards sustainable outcomes in student partnerships: Partnership values in the pilot year. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3081
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co‐producer: learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802562857
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in gigher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Neary, M. (2012). Student as producer: An institution of the common? [or how to recover communist/revolutionary science]. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 4(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2012.04030003
Salazar, C. (2021). We are friends? Navigating relationships with undocumented college students as co-researchers in participatory action research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(8), 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1956622
Shanahan, J. O., Ackley-Holbrook, E., Hall, E., Stewart, K., & Walkington, H. (2015). Ten salient practices of undergraduate research mentors: A review of the literature. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1126162
Smith, S., Akhyani, K., Axson, D., Arnautu, A., & Stanimirova, I. (2021a). Learning together: A case study of a partnership to co-create assessment criteria. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4647
Smith, S., Akhyani, K., Axson, D., Arnautu, A., & Stanimirova, I. (2021b). The partnership co-creation process: Conditions for success? International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4772
Smith, S., & Smith, C. (2022). Navigating the supervisory relationship: Covid-19 as a catalyst in displacing entrenched practices. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v10i1.531
Smith, S., & Watson, S. (2022). Experiences of belonging: A comparative case study between China-domiciled and UK-domiciled students. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(4). https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol19/iss4/12
Taylor, P., & Wilding, D. (2009). Rethinking the values of higher education-the student as collaborator and producer? Undergraduate research as a case study.
Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: A summary of findings and recommendations from the What works? Student Retention & Success programme. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/building-student-engagement-and-belonging-higher-education-time-change-summary
University of Leeds. (2021). The British Conference of Undergraduate Research. https://eu.eventscloud.com/ehome/bcur2020/home/
University of Sussex. (2021). About the JRA scheme. Sussex Research Online. https://www.sussex.ac.uk/suro/applying
Walkington, H., & Ommering, B. (2022). How does engaging in authentic research at undergraduate level contribute to student well-being? Studies in Higher Education, 47(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2082400
Walkington, H., Stewart, K. A., Hall, E. E., Ackley, E., & Shanahan, J. O. (2020). Salient practices of award-winning undergraduate research mentors – balancing freedom and control to achieve excellence. Studies in Higher Education, 45(7), 1519–1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637838
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shilan Dargahi, Susan Smith, Jessica Horne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
