Students priming students for success
Students as partners in development of pre-lecture resources for introductory genetics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5471Keywords:
Students as partners, Genetics, Pre-lecture materials, Reflections, Large classesAbstract
Introductory science courses can be a struggle for instructors and students not only because of the challenging nature of the material, but also due to differences in the background knowledge of students. Provision of pre-lecture resources reviewing or introducing key concepts is recommended to support diverse students. In this paper, we describe the iterative design, implementation, and assessment of pre-lecture PRIMERs in a large, introductory genetics course. The development of PRIMERs was conceived, driven, and performed by a student-staff team. Data over 2 years demonstrate that most students considered that PRIMERs supported their learning of the lecture material. Student comments revealed that they found the summaries and practice problems useful, and that they used PRIMERs both as lecture preparation and examination review resources. These results suggest that the students-as-partners model is an effective way to create and refine course resources.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, A., Ali, A., VanMaaren, J., Barrington, J., Merritt, O., & Ansilio, K. (2017). Partnership in practice: Implementing Healey’s conceptual model. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3197
Berry, T., Cook, L., Hill, N., & Stevens, K. (2010). An exploratory analysis of textbook usage and study habits: Misperceptions and barriers to success. College Teaching, 59(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.509376
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Carbone, E., & Greenberg, J. (1998). Teaching large classes: Unpacking the problem and responding creatively. To Improve the Academy, 17(1), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1998.tb00355.x
Clump, M. A., Bauer, H., & Bradley, C. (2004). The extent to which psychology students read textbooks: A multiple class analysis of reading across the psychology curriculum. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(3), 227–233.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Crane, P., & Richardson, L. (2000). Reconnect action research kit. Department of Family and Community Services, Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.dss.gov.au/families-and-children-programs-services-reconnect/reconnect-action-research-kit
Curran, R. (2017). Students as partners—Good for students, good for staff: A study on the impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff engagement. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3089
Dickerson, C., Jarvis, J., & Stockwell, L. (2016). Staff–student collaboration: Student learning from working together to enhance educational practice in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1136279
Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2019). Action research in education: A practical guide. Guilford Publications.
Felten, P., Abbot, S., Kirkwood, J., Long, A., Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Verwoord, R. (2019). Reimagining the place of students in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1594235
Gammerdinger, W. J., & Kocher, T. D. (2018). Understanding student perceptions and practices for pre-lecture content reading in the genetics classroom. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1371
Goff, L., & Knorr, K. (2018). Three heads are better than one: Students, faculty, and educational developers as co-developers of Science curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3333
Hadie, S. N., Simok, A. A., Shamsuddin, S. A., & Mohammad, J. A. (2019). Determining the impact of pre-lecture educational video on comprehension of a difficult gross anatomy lecture. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 14(4), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.06.008
Hanna-Benson, C., Kroeze, S., Gandhi, R., Haffie, T., & Wahl, L. M. (2020). Students as partners in collaborative course design and educational research. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i2.4237
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Hill, M., Sharma, M. D., & Xu, Y. (2017). Pre-lecture online learning modules in university physics: Student participation, perceptions, and performance. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(1). https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/CAL/article/view/10998
Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
Hilton, J. (2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: a synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
Kinsella, G. K., Mahon, C., & Lillis, S. (2017). Using pre-lecture activities to enhance learner engagement in a large group setting. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417715205
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2017). Co-creation of the curriculum: Challenging the status quo to embed partnership. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 3(2). https://www.journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/529
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2018). Students as partners in learning and teaching: The benefits of co-creation of the curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3207
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063
Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620001
Petrescu, D. S., Yazdani, A., VanderSchee, C. R., Bailey, C. A., Covens, F., & Harpp, D. N. (2021). An undergraduate peer mentoring program at a Canadian university: Impact on student learning as perceived by instructors, peer mentors, and students. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4553
Pulukuri, S., & Abrams, B. (2021). Improving learning outcomes and metacognitive monitoring: Replacing traditional textbook readings with question-embedded videos. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(7), 2156–2166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00237
Robertson, E. M., Thompson, K. L., & Notebaert, A. J. (2020). Perceived benefits of anatomy coursework prior to medical and dental school. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1882
Salehi, S., Burkholder, E., Lepage, G. P., Pollock, S., & Wieman, C. (2019). Demographic gaps or preparation gaps?: The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of students in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020114
Seery, M. K., & Donnelly, R. (2012). The implementation of pre-lecture resources to reduce in-class cognitive load: A case study for higher education chemistry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01237.x
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE.
UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries–final report (CI-2002/CONF.803/CLD.1). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000128515
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2013). College textbooks: Students have greater access to textbook information (Publication No. GAO-13-368). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-13-368
Varghese, R., Norman, T. S., & Thavaraj, S. (2015). Perceived stress and self efficacy among college students: A global review. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Research, 5(3), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2703908
Vazquez, J. J., & Chiang, E. P. (2016). Preparing students for class: A clinical trial testing the efficacy between multimedia pre-lectures and textbooks in an economics course. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 13(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v13i2.9631
Werder, C., & Otis, M. M. (Eds.). (2010). Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Stylus.
Western, T. L., Brosseau, R., & Guo, I. (2020). FSCI 396 brings undergraduate students into the course assessment and design process. In SALTISE: Proceedings from the 9th annual meeting: 2020 COVID-19 pivot. Teaching transformations: Small changes, big impact. SALTISE. https://www.saltise.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/SALTISE_Proceedings_2020_v7.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Heather Fice, Jacqueline Yao, Paary Balakumar, Samuel Richer, Tamara Western
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
