Engaging students as partners (SaP) in a collaborative inquiry to develop a course

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5557

Keywords:

student partnerships, collaborative inquiry, curriculum design, digital whiteboard

Abstract

Aiming to develop a course with students as partners and to explore the process, two faculty initiated a curriculum development partnership with graduate students to design a new field study course. Applying a collaborative inquiry approach, we engaged in a research collaboration with graduate students online. The data collection was organised and facilitated using MURAL, a digital whiteboard that enabled synchronous and asynchronous visual collaboration with pictures, text, links, emojis, diagrams, and drawings. The study concluded with an exploration of the students’ experiences in the project. The co-created course design and pedagogy informed the development of a new field study course which was subsequently approved through the university curriculum approval process. Students shared that they appreciated reflecting, sharing, and contributing together as a group; they felt important and valued; and that it was meaningful to them to contribute to the learning of future students entering the program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aljawarneh, S. A. (2020). Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0

Bengtson, C., Ahlkvist, M., Ekeroth, W., Nilsen-Moe, A., Vedin, N. P., Rodiuchkina, K., Ye, S., & Lundberg, M. (2017). Working as partners: Course development by a student-teacher team. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110206

Billett, P., & Martin, D. (2018). Engaging students in co-creation of sociological knowledge and curriculum design as a form of deep engagement. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.5.7

Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher education? In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 461–476). Emerald.

Bovill, C., & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bray, J. N., Lee, J., Smith, L. L., & Yorks, L. (2000). Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and making meaning. Sage.

Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institutions using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z

Chan, K., & Stacey, P. (2022). Desirable difficulties and student-faculty partnership. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1861964

Cook‐Sather, A. (2008). ‘What you get is looking in a mirror, only better’: Inviting students to reflect (on) college teaching. Reflective Practice, 9(4): 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802431465

Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694

Davies, P., Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Implications of threshold concepts for curriculum design and evaluation. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 70–84). Routledge.

Godbold, N., Hung, T. Y., & Matthews, K. E. (2022). Exploring the role of conflict in co-creation of curriculum through engaging students as partners in the classroom. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1887095

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher

Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472

Kent, S. (2016). Threshold concepts. Taylor Institute of Teaching and Learning, University of Calgary. https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/sites/default/files/TI%20Guides/Threshold_Concepts_Guide.pdf

Khalaf, B. K., & Mohammed Zin, Z. B. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a

Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2018). Students as partners in learning and teaching: The benefits of co-creation of the curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3207

Lysberg, J. (2023). Unpacking capabilities for professional learning: Teachers’ reflections on processes of collaborative inquiry in situated teamwork. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2022-0008

Marquis, E. (2018). Embracing and/or avoiding the risks of partnership: A faculty perspective. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(24). https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss24/9

Matthews, K. E., Groenendijk, L. J., & Chunduri, P. (2017). We want to be more involved: Student perceptions of students as partners across the degree program curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3063

McCreadie, C. R. (2020). Learner-teacher partnership in times of COVID-19: Community poll review. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i2.4371

Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190

Schnellert, L., & Butler, D. L. (2014). Collaborative inquiry. Retrieved from https://www.edcan.ca/articles/collaborative-inquiry/

Shay, S., & Peseta, T. (2016). A socially just curriculum reform agenda. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1159057

Tai, J. H. M., Dollinger, M., Ajjawi, R., Jorre de St Jorre, T., Krattli, S., McCarthy, D., & Prezioso, D. (2023). Designing assessment for inclusion: An exploration of diverse students’ assessment experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2082373

Turner, N. K., Healey, M., & Bens, S. (2021). Developing the curriculum within an institution using a change academy approach: A process focus. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1840988

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-15

How to Cite

Wilson-Mah, R., & McLean, A.-K. (2024). Engaging students as partners (SaP) in a collaborative inquiry to develop a course. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5557

Issue

Section

Research Articles