Building pedagogical partnerships
Exploring an innovative work-integrated learning initiative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5637Keywords:
work-integrated learning, co-operative education, pedagogical partnerships, students as partnersAbstract
Engaging students as pedagogical partners in teaching and learning in higher education is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, developing and sustaining such partnerships can be challenging. The present study highlights the potential of utilizing work-integrated learning (WIL) students as partners. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 university instructors to explore how access to an online learning assistant (OLA) program helped them navigate remote instruction challenges. The OLA program was a novel WIL initiative providing co-operative (co-op) education students with full-time, paid work to assist instructors transitioning to remote learning. Unexpectedly, our findings demonstrate that pedagogical partnerships emerged in the context of this WIL program, leading to teaching and learning benefits. Online learning assistants were able to assist instructors with many of the difficulties they faced, although some program challenges also emerged. Our findings suggest that full-time, paid co-op student positions offer a unique program structure that make them ideal for the development and ongoing success of pedagogical partnerships.
Downloads
References
Acai, A., Akesson, B., Allen, M., Chen, V., Mathany, C., McCollum, B., Spencer, J., & Verwoord, R. E. M. (2017). Success in student-faculty/staff SoTL partnerships: Motivations, challenges, power, and definitions. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.2.8
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Bilous, R., Hammersley, L., Lloyd, K., Rawlings-Sanaei, F., Downey, G., Amigo, M., Gilchrist, S., & Baker, M. (2018). ‘All of us together in a blurred space’: Principles for co-creating curriculum with international partners. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1412973
Bindra, G., Easwaran, K., Firasta, L., Hirsch, M., Kapoor, A., Sosnowski, A., Stec-Marksman, T., & Vatansever, G. (2018). Increasing representation and equity in students as partners initiatives. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3536
Bovill, C. (2017). A framework to explore roles within student-staff partnerships in higher education: Which students are partners, when, and in what ways? International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3062
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Bovill, C., Morss, K., & Bulley, C. (2009). Should students participate in curriculum design? Discussion arising from a first year curriculum design project and a literature review. Pedagogical Research in Maximising Education, 3(2), 17–25. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/should-students-participate-in-curriculum-design-discussion-arisi
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155–172). The Guilford Press.
Chenery-Morris, S. (2015). The importance of continuity of mentorship in pre-registration midwifery education. Evidence Based Midwifery, 13(2), 47–53.
Colclasure, B. C., Marlier, A., Durham, M. F., Brooks, T. D., & Kerr, M. (2021). Identified challenges from faculty teaching at predominantly undergraduate institutions after abrupt transition to emergency remote teaching during the covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090556
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: What can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instructional Science, 42(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9292-3
Cook-Sather, A., Bahti, M., & Ntem, A. (2019). Pedagogical partnerships: A how-to guide for faculty, students, and academic developers in higher education. Elon University Center for Engaged Learning. https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa1
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Curran, R. (2017). Students as partners-good for students, good for staff: A study on the impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff engagement. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3089
Curtis, N. A., & Anderson, R. D. (2021). Moving toward student-faculty partnership in systems-level assessment: A qualitative analysis. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i1.4204
Dahl, C. (2011). Supervising academic library internships for non-LIS undergraduates. Library Management, 32(6/7), 408-418. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121111158556
De Bie, A., Krishna Prasad, S., Nguyen, E., & Marquis, E. (2022). Considerations for seeking equity and justice through pedagogical partnership. Imagining SoTL, 2(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl603
Devlin, M., & Samarawickrema, G. (2022). A commentary on the criteria of effective teaching in post-COVID higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2002828
Dobbins, K., & Fell, P. L. (2020). Using the notion of ‘gift exchange’ to explore effective mentoring relationships in the placement setting. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(3), 334-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1573218
Dollinger, M., & Lodge, J. (2020). Student-staff co-creation in higher education: An evidence-informed model to support future design and implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(5), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1663681
Drewery, D., Potwarka, M., & Potwarka, L. (2022). How the online learning assistant program supported course instructor wellbeing during a transition to remote teaching. Tourism Cases. https://doi.org/10.1079/tourism.2022.0039
Dwyer, A. (2018). Toward the formation of genuine partnership spaces. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3503
Fannon, A. M. (2023). The practice of co-operative education. In K. E. Zegwaard & T. J. Pretti (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of work-integrated learning (3rd ed., pp. 147–162). Routledge.
Felten, P., Bagg, J., Bumbry, M., Hill, J., Hornsby, K., Pratt, M., & Weller, S. (2013). A call for expanding inclusive student engagement in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.2.63
Fleming, J., & Haigh, N. J. (2017). Examining and challenging the intentions of work-integrated learning. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 7(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-01-2017-0003
Fleming, J., & Hickey, C. (2013). Exploring cooperative education partnerships: A case study in sport tertiary education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(3), 209–221. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1113757.pdf
Fleming, J., McLachlan, K., & Pretti, T. J. (2018). Successful work-integrated learning relationships: A framework for sustainability. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(4), 321–335. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1199460.pdf
Fleming, J., & Pretti, T. J. (2019). The impact of work-integrated learning students on workplace dynamics. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100209
Government of Canada. (2021). Budget 2021 - Young Canadians. Department of Finance Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2021/04/young-canadians.html
Gros, B., & López, M. (2016). Students as co-creators of technology-rich learning activities in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0026-x
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Jackson, D., Shan, H., & Meek, S. (2022). Enhancing graduates’ enterprise capabilities through work-integrated learning in co-working spaces. Higher Education, 84, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00756-x
Kay, J., McRae, N., & Russell, L. (2020). Two institutional responses to work-integrated learning in a time of COVID-19: Canada and Australia. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(5), 491–503. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1271564
Kemp, C., van Herwerden, L., Molloy, E., Kleve, S., Brimblecombe, J., Reidlinger, D., & Palermo, C. (2021). How do students offer value to organisations through work integrated learning? A qualitative study using Social Exchange Theory. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 26(3), 1075–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10038-x
Könings, K. D., Mordang, S., Smeenk, F., Stassen, L., & Ramani, S. (2021). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher, 43(8), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464
Marquis, E., Black, C., & Healey, M. (2017). Responding to the challenges of student-staff partnership: The reflections of participants at an international summer institute. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(6), 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1289510
Marquis, E., Carrasco-Acosta, E., De Bie, A., Krishna Prasad, S., Wadhwani, S., & Woolmer, C. (2022). Toward redressing inequities through partnership: A critical assessment of an equity-focused partnership initiative. International Journal for Students as Partners, 6(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v6i1.4895
Marquis, E., Jayaratnam, A., Mishra, A., & Rybkina, K. (2018). “I feel like some students are better connected”: Students’ perspectives on applying for extracurricular partnership opportunities. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3300
Martens, S. E., Spruijt, A., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., Whittingham, J. R. D., & Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2019). A students’ take on student–staff partnerships: Experiences and preferences. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 910–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1546374
Martin, A. J., Rees, M., Fleming, J., Zegwaard, K. E., & Vaughan, K. (2019). Work-integrated learning gone full circle: How prior work placement experiences influenced workplace supervisors. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 20(3), 229–242. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1232886.pdf
Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L., & Turner, J. (2018). Conceptions of students as partners. Higher Education, 76(6), 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y
McDaniel, C., Suffern, C., Joo, J., & Alamuddin, R. (2020). Student and faculty experiences with emergency remote learning in Spring 2020: Insights from a small exploratory study. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.314276
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Ministry of Education. (2019). Shaping a stronger education system with New Zealanders: Discussion document. https://conversation.education.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Discussion-Document-Shaping-a-Stronger-Education-System-with-NZers-Final19.pdf
Monico, C., & Kupatadze, K. (2020). Developing meaningful and practical global experiences through student-faculty-community partnerships. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i2.4002
Mukuria, V. (2022). Preparation for work: Reflections on developing an international Indigenous field trip. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 23(2), 169–186. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1346553
Nevison, C., Cormier, L., Pretti, J., & Drewery, D. (2018). The influence of values on supervisors’ satisfaction with co-op student employees. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(1), 1–11. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1179839
Ng, N. (2021). Ascension of work-integrated learning in Canada: Influence on post-secondary education and government priorities. In A. E. Sterling & T. J. Pretti (Eds.), The practice of co-op and work-integrated learning in the Canadian context (pp. 15–20). Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada (CEWIL) and The World Association for Cooperative and Work-Integrated Education (WACE). https://cewilcanada.ca/common/Uploaded%20files/Public%20Resources/research/The%20Practice%20of%20Co-op%20and%20Work-Integrated%20Learning%20in%20the%20Canadian%20Context%20(2).pdf
O’Connor, M. D., Denejkina, A., & Arvanitakis, J. (2023). Preparing doctoral candidates for employment: Delivering research and employability skills training in the PhD via work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 24(1), 19–42. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1379044
Pelnar, H., Reyes, G., Sehgal, K., & Cameron, L. (2020). Partners, not peers: Defining boundaries and expectations in student partnerships. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(2), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i2.4289
Rowe, A., Mackaway, J., & Winchester-Seeto, T. (2012). ‘But I thought you were doing that’-Clarifying the role of the host supervisor in experience-based learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 13(2), 115–134. https://www.ijwil.org/files/APJCE_13_2_115_134.pdf
Rowland, S. (2020). A students-as-partners approach to developing a work-integrated learning program for science. In T. Lowe & Y. El Hakim (Eds.), A handbook for student engagement in higher education: Theory into practice (pp. 125–135). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429023033-11
Ruskin, J., & Bilous, R. H. (2020). A tripartite framework for extending university-student co-creation to include workplace partners in the work-integrated learning context. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(4), 806–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1693519
Ruskin, J., Hutchison, J., & Bilous, R. (2018, October 3-5). Co-creating curriculum to support co-op: A case for engaging both partners and students [Conference presentation abstract]. Australian Collaborative Education Network National Conference, Brisbane, Australia. https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/co-creating-curriculum-to-support-co-op-a-case-for-engaging-both-
Sachs, J., Rowe, A., & Wilson, M. (2016). 2016 Good practice report: Work integrated learning (WIL). Department of Education and Training. https://ltr.edu.au/resources/WIL_Report_2016.pdf
Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Seale, J., Gibson, S., Haynes, J., & Potter, A. (2015). Power and resistance: Reflections on the rhetoric and reality of using participatory methods to promote student voice and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.938264
Sebastian, K. (2019). Distinguishing between the types of grounded theory: Classical, interpretive and constructivist. Journal for Social Thought, 3(1). https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/jst/article/view/4116
Waters, L., Lo, K., & Maloney, S. (2018). What impact do students have on clinical educators and the way they practise? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(3), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9785-y
West, L., & Stirling, A. (2021). Re-designing work study as work-integrated learning: Examining the impact of structured learning support in part-time on-campus employment. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 22(3), 385–395. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1313485
World Health Organization. (2020, March 11). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
Zaff, M., Klionsky, S., Matthews-DeNatale, G., Lam, S., & Raffo, R. (2021). Students as partners as a model for research on reflection and cooperative education. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(32). https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss32/9/
Zegwaard, K., Pretti, T. J., Rowe, A., & Ferns, S. (2023). Defining work-integrated learning. In K. Zegwaard & T. J. Pretti (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of work-integrated learning (3rd ed., pp. 29–48). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Katie Knapp, Anne-Marie Fannon, Iris Xing, Marissa Spinosa Radman, T. Judene Pretti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
