Culture of engagement
Students as change agents before, during and after an examination-focused partnership
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5531Mots-clés :
Students as partners, student influence, , co-creation, open inquiry, conceptual understandingRésumé
Students can influence their education through evaluations and as representatives in university decision-making bodies. A way to give them more power is through participation in course development as equal partners. In this study, the relationship between the outcome of a student-teacher partnership and a culture of student influence and engagement is explored. This is done through specifically targeting examination, an area where formal power rests far away from the actual partnership. The partnership outcome was evaluated through post-project surveys and group interviews, together with post-course evaluations. The students in the project, most of them with significant experience as student representatives, emphasized their ability to make meaningful change. At the same time, the students taking the revised course appreciated the implemented changes. A culture of engagement positively affected the outcome of the partnership, while the partnership itself strengthened students in their roles as change agents.
Téléchargements
Références
Andrews, M., Brown, R., & Mesher, L. (2018). Engaging students with assessment and feedback: Improving assessment for learning with students as partners. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 32–46.
Bengtson, C., Ahlkvist, M., Ekeroth, W., Nilsen-Moe, A., Proos Vedin, N., Rodiuchkina, K., Ye, S., & Lundberg, M. (2017). Working as partners: Course development by a student-teacher team. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110206
Bengtson, C., Ahlkvist, M., Ekeroth, W., Nilsen-Moe, A., Proos Vedin, N., Rodiuchkina, K., Ye, S., & Lundberg, M. (2018). Kursutveckling i partnerskap mellan lärare och studenter. In Pedagogiska utmaningar i en dynamisk samtid. (pp. 38–51). In A. Hössjer, M. Magnusson & P. Reinholdsson (Eds.), Pedagogiska utmaningar i en dynamisk samtid. Uppsala University. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-364573
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (1st ed., pp. 24–36). Routledge.
Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: A new trend or an old idea we never got around to implementing? In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning through research and scholarship: 20 years of ISL.(pp. 96-108). The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development.
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Cook‐Sather, A. (2011). Layered learning: Student consultants deepening classroom and life lessons. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.547680
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: What can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instructional Science, 42(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9292-3
Cook-Sather, A. (2018). Listening to equity-seeking perspectives: How students’ experiences of pedagogical partnership can inform wider discussions of student success. Higher education research & development, 37(5), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1457629
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in teaching and learning: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass
Cook-Sather, A., & Luz, A. (2015). Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: What happens when students cross the threshold of student–faculty partnership. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.911263
Cracolice, M. S., Deming, J. C., & Ehlert, B. (2008). Concept learning versus problem solving: A cognitive difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(6), 873. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p873
Croft, T., Duah, F., & Loch, B. (2013). ‘I’m worried about the correctness’: Undergraduate students as producers of screencasts of mathematical explanations for their peers–lecturer and student perceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(7), 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.823252
Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Delpish, A., Holmes, A., Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., Darby, A., King, K., & Felten, P. (2010). Equalizing voices: Student-faculty partnership in course design. In C. Werder & M. M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning (pp. 96–114). Routledge.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 3–31.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Healey, R. L., Lerczak, A., Welsh, K., & France, D. (2019). By any other name? The impacts of differing assumptions, expectations, and misconceptions in bringing about resistance to student-staff partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3550
Jackson, D., & Bridgstock, R. (2021). What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning and paid work. Higher Education, 81(4), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00570-x
Jessop, T., El Hakim, Y., & Gibbs, G. (2014). The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: A large-scale study of students’ learning in response to different programme assessment patterns. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.792108
Joughin, G. (2010). The hidden curriculum revisited: A critical review of research into the influence of summative assessment on learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903221493
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., & Bovill, C. (2021). Do students experience transformation through co-creating curriculum in higher education? Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7) 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1928060
Luo, B., Matthews, K., & Chunduri, P. (2019). “Commitment to collaboration”: What students have to say about the values underpinning partnership practices. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3688
Marquis, E., Puri, V., Wan, S., Ahmad, A., Goff, L., Knorr, K., Vassileva, I., & Woo, J. (2016). Navigating the threshold of student–staff partnerships: A case study from an Ontario teaching and learning institute. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113538
Marquis, E., Jayaratnam, A., Mishra, A., & Rybkina, K. (2018). “I feel like some students are better connected”: Students’ perspectives on applying for extracurricular partnership opportunities. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3300
McKevitt, C. T. (2016). Engaging students with self-assessment and tutor feedback to improve performance and support assessment capacity. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.13.1.2
Meer, N., & Chapman, A. (2014). Co-creation of marking criteria: Students as partners in the assessment process. Business and Management Education in HE, 1–15. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.11120/bmhe.2014.00008
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Bovill, C. (2020). Equity and diversity in institutional approaches to student–staff partnership schemes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2541–2557. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1620721
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, L. S., Matthews, K.E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Islam, M., & Reid, T. (2021). Are we just engaging ‘the usual suspects’? Challenges in and practical strategies for supporting equity and diversity in student–staff partnership initiatives. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1655396
Mihans, R., Long, D. & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216
Ní Bheoláin, R., Lowney, R., & O'Riordan, F. (2020). Students as partners in assessment (SaPiA): A literature scoping review. National Institute for Digital Learning, Dublin University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4270579
O’Donovan, B., Rust, C., & Price, M. (2016). A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774
Price, M., Carroll, J., O’Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2011). If I was going there I wouldn’t start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903512883
Robinson, C. (2012). Student engagement: What does this mean in practice in the context of higher education institutions? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/17581181211273039
Smith, S., Akhyani, K., Axson, D., Arnautu, A., & Stanimirova, I. (2021). The partnership co-creation process: Conditions for success? International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4772
Snyder, B. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. Knopf.
Woolmer, C., Sneddon, P., Curry, G., Hill, B., Fehertavi, S., Longbone, C., & Wallace, K. (2016). Student staff partnership to create an interdisciplinary science skills course in a research intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113969
Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: challenges and limits. Science education international, 23(4), 383–399.
Zoller, U. (2003). HOCS problem solving vs. LOCS exercise solving: What do college science students prefer? In P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulpoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society (pp. 201–207). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0165-5_22
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Antonia Kotronia, Lina Fransén, Victor Hellgren, Magnus Mortensen, Susanna Olsson, Nathalie Proos Vedin, Maja Elmgren, Marcus Lundberg 2023
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
