Research assistants’ experiences of co-creating partnership learning communities for learning and teaching in higher education

  • Gladys Sterenberg Mount Royal University
  • Kevin O'Connor Mount Royal University
  • Ashlyn Donnelly Mount Royal University
  • Ranee Drader
Keywords: partnership learning community, research assistants

Abstract

Calls for enhancing student engagement in higher education have offered strong arguments for student-faculty partnerships in teaching and learning. Drawing on a conceptual model of partnership learning communities (PLC), we investigate the experiences of two undergraduate research assistants (co-authors of this paper) who participated in a PLC within a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning research study. In this paper, we use data from transcripts of four research conversations occurring over a three-year period. Evidence of research assistants’ experiences was co-analyzed using benefits and challenges identified in the literature. Our findings reveal that our PLC helped these research assistants develop student agency and provided opportunities for reflection on learning. We conclude that participating in our PLC helped the two research assistants develop deeper pedagogical relationships amongst themselves and with the faculty partners. Moreover, our study directly contributed to the development of our bachelor of education degree program while ensuring students were partners in that process.

References

Allin, L. (2014). Collaboration between staff and students in the scholarship of teaching and learning: The potential and the problems. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 2(1), 95-98.

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 1-5.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Cambridge, D., Kaplan, S., & Suter, V. (2005). Community of practice design guide: A step-by-step guide for designing and cultivating communities of practice in higher education. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2005/1/community-of-practice-design-guide-a-stepbystep-guide-for-designing-cultivating-communities-of-practice-in-higher-education.

Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121-125.

Felten, P., Bagg, J., Bumbry, M., Hill, J., Hornsby, K., Pratt, M., & Weller, S. (2013). A call for expanding inclusive student engagement in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 63-67.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Healey M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014a). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York, England: The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf

Healey M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-4.

The Higher Education Academy. (2015). Student engagement through partnership in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/individuals/strategic-priorities/student-engagement.

Hutchings, P. (2002). Ethics of inquiry: Issues in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications.

Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 10-15.

Kreber, C. (Ed.) (2001). Scholarship revisited: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-Impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

McKinney, K. (2004). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Past lessons, current challenges, and future visions. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 22(1), 3-19.

Mihans, R.J. II., Long, D.T., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 4-7.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. (n.d.) What is SoTL? Retrieved from https://www.stlhe.ca/sotl/what-is-sotl/

Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Published
2018-05-07
How to Cite
Sterenberg, G., O’Connor, K., Donnelly, A., & Drader, R. (2018). Research assistants’ experiences of co-creating partnership learning communities for learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal for Students As Partners, 2(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3196
Section
Research Articles