Five Propositions for Genuine Students as Partners Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315Keywords:
students as partners, higher education, power, equity, ethicsAbstract
This editorial proposes five interrelated principles for good practice in partnership. Because it is a key force in partnership, power connects the five propositions. My intention is to draw together various threads of research and practice into overarching principles that can guide meaningful, power-sharing, and influential partnership approaches across a diverse range of institutional contexts and Students as Partners approaches.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Barnacle, R. & Dall’Alba, G. (2017. Committed to learn: student engagement and care in higher education, Higher Education Research & Development, DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1326879
Bell, A., Peseta, T., Barahona, S., Jeong, S., Lan, L., Menzies, R., Trieu, T., & Wen, A. (2017). In Conversation Together: Student Ambassadors for Cultural Competence. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21), 5.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Eds) Knowledge, Education, and Cultural Change. London: Routledge, pp. 71-112.
Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher education. The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education, 461-75.
Bovill, C. (2017). A Framework to Explore Roles Within Student-Staff Partnerships in Higher Education: Which Students Are Partners, When, and in What Ways? International Journal of Students as Partners 1(1).
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195-208.
Bryson, C., Furlonger, R., & Rinaldo-Langridge, F. (2015). A critical consideration of, and research agenda for, the approach of “students as partners.” In International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Cook-Sather, A., & Agu, P. (2013). Students of color and faculty members working together toward culturally sustaining pedagogy. In J. E. Groccia & L. Cruz (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 32, pp. 271–285). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2017). Ethics of academic leadership: Guiding learning and teaching. In F. Su, & M. Wood (Eds.), Cosmopolitan perspectives on academic leadership in higher education (pp. 175-191). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Felten, P. (2017). Partnerships and emotion. International Journal of Students as Partners 1(2).
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121-125.
Felten, P., Gardner, J.N., Schroeder, C.C., Lambert, L.M., & Barefoot, B.O. (2016). The undergraduate experience: Focusing institutions on what matters most. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
Freeman, R. (2016) Is student voice necessarily empowering? Problematising student voice as a form of higher education governance, Higher Education Research & Development, 35:4, 859-862.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder & Herder, New York.
Green, W. (2017). Engaging students as partners in global learning. Retrieved from http://altf.org/fellows/green-wendy/
Greene, M. (1994). Teaching for openings: Pedagogy as dialectic. Pedagogy in the age of politics: Writing and reading (in) the academy, 1-12.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
Healey, R. L., Bass, T., Caulfield, J., Hoffman, A., McGinn, M. K., Miller-Young, J., & Haigh, M. (2013). Being ethically minded: Practising the scholarship of teaching and learning in an ethical manner. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(2), 23-33.
Kehler, A., Verwoord, R., & Smith, H. (2017) We are the Process: Reflections on the Underestimation of Power in Students as Partners in Practice. International Journal for Students as Partners 1(1), 1-15.
Matthews, K.E. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal 1(1), 1-5.
Matthews, K.E. (2017). Students and staff as partners in Australian higher education: Introducing our stories of partnership. Teaching & Learning Together in Higher Education. May Issue.
Matthews, K.E, Cook-Sather, A., & Healey, M. (in press). Connecting learning, teaching, and research through student-staff partnerships: toward universities as egalitarian learning communities. In V. Tong, A. Standen, A., & M. Sotiriou, (Eds.) Research equals Teaching: Inspiring research-based education through student-staff partnerships. London: University College of London Press.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S.L., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Kris Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal of
Students as Partners 1(1).
Mihans, R., D. Long, & P. Felten. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2, 2: 1–9.
Mills, C. (2008). Reproduction and transformation of inequalities in schooling: The transformative potential of the theoretical constructs of Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 79-89.
Monsen, S., Cook, S., & Hannant, L. (2017). Students as Partners in Negotiated Assessment in a Teacher Education Course. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21), 2.
REACT Project (2017) Special Issue: Reaching Hard to Reach through Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Innovation,
Partnership and Change. 3 (1)
Seale, J., Gibson, S., Haynes, J., & Potter, A. (2015). Power and resistance: Reflections on the rhetoric and reality of using participatory methods to promote student voice and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 534- 552.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shepherd, S. 2014. The Rise of the Career PVC. Engage 36. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Accessed 16 December 2016. https://www.lfhe.ac.uk/en/research-resources/publications-hub/past-editions/engage-36-autumn-2014/in-practice/index.cfm
Bell, A., Peseta, T., Barahona, S., Jeong, S., Lan, L., Menzies, R., Trieu, T., & Wen, A. (2017). In Conversation Together: Student Ambassadors for Cultural Competence. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21), 5.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Eds) Knowledge, Education, and Cultural Change. London: Routledge, pp. 71-112.
Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher education. The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education, 461-75.
Bovill, C. (2017). A Framework to Explore Roles Within Student-Staff Partnerships in Higher Education: Which Students Are Partners, When, and in What Ways? International Journal of Students as Partners 1(1).
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195-208.
Bryson, C., Furlonger, R., & Rinaldo-Langridge, F. (2015). A critical consideration of, and research agenda for, the approach of “students as partners.” In International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Cook-Sather, A., & Agu, P. (2013). Students of color and faculty members working together toward culturally sustaining pedagogy. In J. E. Groccia & L. Cruz (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 32, pp. 271–285). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2017). Ethics of academic leadership: Guiding learning and teaching. In F. Su, & M. Wood (Eds.), Cosmopolitan perspectives on academic leadership in higher education (pp. 175-191). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Felten, P. (2017). Partnerships and emotion. International Journal of Students as Partners 1(2).
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121-125.
Felten, P., Gardner, J.N., Schroeder, C.C., Lambert, L.M., & Barefoot, B.O. (2016). The undergraduate experience: Focusing institutions on what matters most. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
Freeman, R. (2016) Is student voice necessarily empowering? Problematising student voice as a form of higher education governance, Higher Education Research & Development, 35:4, 859-862.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder & Herder, New York.
Green, W. (2017). Engaging students as partners in global learning. Retrieved from http://altf.org/fellows/green-wendy/
Greene, M. (1994). Teaching for openings: Pedagogy as dialectic. Pedagogy in the age of politics: Writing and reading (in) the academy, 1-12.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
Healey, R. L., Bass, T., Caulfield, J., Hoffman, A., McGinn, M. K., Miller-Young, J., & Haigh, M. (2013). Being ethically minded: Practising the scholarship of teaching and learning in an ethical manner. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(2), 23-33.
Kehler, A., Verwoord, R., & Smith, H. (2017) We are the Process: Reflections on the Underestimation of Power in Students as Partners in Practice. International Journal for Students as Partners 1(1), 1-15.
Matthews, K.E. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal 1(1), 1-5.
Matthews, K.E. (2017). Students and staff as partners in Australian higher education: Introducing our stories of partnership. Teaching & Learning Together in Higher Education. May Issue.
Matthews, K.E, Cook-Sather, A., & Healey, M. (in press). Connecting learning, teaching, and research through student-staff partnerships: toward universities as egalitarian learning communities. In V. Tong, A. Standen, A., & M. Sotiriou, (Eds.) Research equals Teaching: Inspiring research-based education through student-staff partnerships. London: University College of London Press.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S.L., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Kris Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal of
Students as Partners 1(1).
Mihans, R., D. Long, & P. Felten. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2, 2: 1–9.
Mills, C. (2008). Reproduction and transformation of inequalities in schooling: The transformative potential of the theoretical constructs of Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 79-89.
Monsen, S., Cook, S., & Hannant, L. (2017). Students as Partners in Negotiated Assessment in a Teacher Education Course. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21), 2.
REACT Project (2017) Special Issue: Reaching Hard to Reach through Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Innovation,
Partnership and Change. 3 (1)
Seale, J., Gibson, S., Haynes, J., & Potter, A. (2015). Power and resistance: Reflections on the rhetoric and reality of using participatory methods to promote student voice and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 534- 552.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shepherd, S. 2014. The Rise of the Career PVC. Engage 36. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Accessed 16 December 2016. https://www.lfhe.ac.uk/en/research-resources/publications-hub/past-editions/engage-36-autumn-2014/in-practice/index.cfm
Downloads
Published
2017-10-07
How to Cite
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five Propositions for Genuine Students as Partners Practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Issue
Section
Editorial
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Kelly E. Matthews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
