Partnership through co-creation: Lessons learnt at the University of Adelaide
Keywords:students as partners, student-staff partnership, co-creation, higher education, design thinking
This paper describes three exemplars of practice inspired by emerging evidence that student-staff partnerships have the potential to significantly enhance many areas of higher education. Students and academics at the University of Adelaide have successfully implemented this collaborative approach across a range of learning and teaching contexts. The Design Thinking Framework, developed by the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University, was utilised at a faculty, program, and course level to frame each of the exemplars, due to its implicit approach to creativity, collaborative development, and achievement of solutions. The iterative nature of the framework facilitated a review cycle for continuous improvement in each Students-as-Partners’ initiative. Analysing the outcomes of each exemplar has identified common hallmarks of successful partnership, and these indicators have the potential to contribute to the growing body of evidence that defines best practice in this pedagogy
Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(1), 186-202
Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher
education. In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 461-476). Bingley: Emerald.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing
potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating
institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher
Education, 71(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Bovill, C. & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design:
Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning (18) Global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176- 188). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher
education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958-1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and
teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Curran, R. (2017). Students as partners—good for students, good for staff: A study on the
impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff
engagement. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2).
Curran, R., & Millard, L. (2016). A partnership approach to developing student capacity to
engage and staff capacity to be engaging: Opportunities for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 67-78.
Deeley, S.J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment
literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463-477. https//doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Design Thinking Educator Toolkit (2014). Riverdale County School. Retrieved from
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in higher education: Towards a
conceptual model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 210-231.
Enright, E., Matthews, K. E., Russell, S., & Sherwood, C. (2018). National Students as Partners
Roundtable Program. Retrieved from https://itali.uq.edu.au/about/projects/students-as-partners
Ghent University (n.d.). Cocreation course. Retrieved from
Harvard University Teaching and Learning Lab. (n.d.). Design thinking in education. Retrieved
Healey, M. (2014, February). Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education.
Workshop presented at University College Cork.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as
partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: HE Academy. Retrieved from
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual
model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
Hoffmann, F. L., & Stake, J. E. (1998). Feminist pedagogy in theory and practice: An empirical
investigation. National Women's Studies Association Journal (NWSA), 79-97. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4316555
Loveys, B. R., McGrice, H., & Snelling, C. (2018). Students as partners: Developing a culture of
co-creation at the University of Adelaide. Proceedings of Students, Transitions, Achievement, Retention and Success (STARS) Annual Conference, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://unistars.org/papers/STARS2018/03E.pdf
Marquis, E., Black, C., & Healey, M. (2017). Responding to the challenges of student-staff
partnership: The reflections of participants at an international summer institute. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(6), 720-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1289510
Mars, M. M. (2009). Student entrepreneurs as agents of organizational change and social
transformation: A grassroots leadership perspective. Journal of Change Management, 9(3), 339-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010903125597
Matthews, K. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student
Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1). Retrieved from
Matthews, K. (2017). Editorial: Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice.
International Journal of Students as Partners 1(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L., & Turner, J. (2018). Conceptions of students as partners.
Higher Education 76, 957-971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K.,
Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as
partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1).
Moore-Cherry, N., Healey, R., Nicholson, D. T., & Andrews, W. (2016). Inclusive partnership:
Enhancing student engagement in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(1), 84-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1066316
Motta, S. C., & Bennett, A. (2018). Pedagogies of care, care-full epistemological practice and
“other” caring subjectivities in enabling education. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 631
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (Eds.). (2015). Design thinking research: Making design
thinking foundational. Springer.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of
Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Snelling, C. (2016). Final Report: Developing teacher capacity to design engaging and effective
SGDE to enhance student learning in health sciences courses. University of Adelaide Learning and Teaching Development Grant.
Torres, J., & Schaffer, J. (2000). Benchmarks for campus/community partnerships. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
How to Cite
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).