Students as assessment partners: A collaborative, qualitative evaluation of the Guns on Campus course-based undergraduate research experience
Keywords:undergraduate research, students as partners , scholarship of teaching and learning, qualitative research, social sciences
The Students-as-Partners (SaP) paradigm has been widely recognized for its enrichment of pedagogy and research, particularly in the scholarship of teaching and learning; in a time of acute disruption to higher education, the SaP model may further provide key insights into the adaptation of high impact teaching practices, although the changing conditions of partnership require close attention. This paper reports on the qualitative evaluation of a multi-campus, hybrid course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) delivered in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis of student reflection data was conducted by a research team of two faculty and four CURE-student participants in a process informed by the Students-as-Partners model. In addition to identifying student-reported challenges, solutions, and educational benefits associated with a hybrid CURE, we reflect on both the unique opportunities, and difficulties, offered by student-faculty partnerships formed and conducted in a virtual meeting space.
Ahmad, A., Ali, A., VanMaaren, J., Barrington, J., Merritt, O., & Ansilio, K. (2017). Partnership in Practice: Implementing Healey’s Conceptual Model. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3197
Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C. M., Pelaez, N., Rowland, S., Towns, M., Trautmann, N. M., Varma-Nelson, P., Weston, T. J., & Dolan, E. L. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: A meeting report. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-01-0004
Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014). Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Can Make Scientific Research More Inclusive. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099
Campbell, A., & Skoog, G. (2004). Facilitating Success in Professional Research: Facilitating Success in Professional Research. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(5), 24–26. JSTOR.
Cavanaugh, M. R., Pfeffer, R., & Ahmad, J. (2016). Undergraduate Student Participation in an Evaluation of a Police Program: A High-Impact Practice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(3), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1131311
Conover, T. E. (2015). Integrating Community-based Research into a Criminal Justice Capstone Course. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(4), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1049631
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. Wiley.
Craney, C., McKay, T., Mazzeo, A., Morris, J., Prigodich, C., & de Groot, R. (2011). Cross-Discipline Perceptions of the Undergraduate Research Experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0000
Dunbar, D., Harrison, M., Mageeney, C., Catagnus, C., Cimo, A., Beckowski, C., & Ratmansky, L. (2012). The rewards and challenges of undergraduate peer mentoring in course-based research: student perspectives from a liberal arts institution. Perspectives on Undergraduate Research and Mentoring, 1, 1-8.
George, M., Lim, H., Lucas, S., & Meadows, R. (2015). Learning by Doing: Experiential Learning in Criminal Justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1052001
Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K., & Lopatto, D. (2011). Classroom-Based Science Research at the Introductory Level: Changes in Career Choices and Attitude. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-12-0151
Hensel, N. H. (Ed.). (2018). Course-Based Undergraduate Research: Educational Equity and High-Impact Practice. Stylus.
Ishiyama, J. T., & Hopkins, V. M. (2003). Assessing the Impact of a Graduate School Preparation Program on First-Generation, Low-Income College Students at a Public Liberal Arts University. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 4(4), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.2190/CB17-UENX-N064-U1HQ
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five Propositions for Genuine Students as Partners Practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
Lopatto, D. (2009). Science in Solution: The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Student Learning. Research Corporation for Science Advancement. https://gustavus.edu/kendallcenter/undergraduate-research/documents/Science_in_Solution_Lopatto.pdf
McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing Learning through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The Challenges and Joys of Juggling. Boston: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Murphy, R., Nixon, S., Brooman, S., & Fearon, D. (2017). “I am wary of giving too much power to students:” Addressing the “but” in the Principle of Staff-Student Partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3055
Ntem, A., Nguyen, E., Rafferty, C., Kwan, C., & Benlahcene, A. (2020). Students as partners in crisis? Student co-editors’ perspectives on COVID-19, values, and the shift to virtual spaces. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i2.4432
Parsons, J. R. M., Parsons, J. C. M., Kohls, K., & Ridolfo, J. (2021). Piloting an Oral History–Based CURE in a General Education Writing Course for First-Year Students. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 4(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/4/2/5
Riddell, J., Gadoury-Sansfaçon, G.-P., & Stoddard, S. (2021). Building institutional capacities for students as partners in the design of COVID classrooms. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4603
Rowland, S. L., Lawrie, G. A., Behrendorff, J. B. Y. H., & Gillam, E. M. J. (2012). Is the undergraduate research experience (URE) always best?: The power of choice in a bifurcated practical stream for a large introductory biochemistry class. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20576
Ruth, A., Brewis, A., & SturtzSreetharan, C. (2021). Effectiveness of social science research opportunities: A study of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). Teaching in Higher Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1903853
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed). SAGE.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Katherine McLean, Samantha Penascino, Jazzmine McCauley, Rachel Russell, Kerian Martinez-Pitre, David Bish, Nathan `Kruis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).