Students as Partners: A critical-digital partnership model for redesigning the language curriculum

Authors

  • Seb Dianati The University of Queensland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v6i1.4807

Keywords:

student as partners, critical pedagogy, critical-digital pedagogy, learning design, operationalisation

Abstract

The global COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable and drastic changes to teaching and learning, forcing many teachers to adopt an online pedagogical approach. This disruption has caused traditional universities to change how their curriculum is delivered and also revisit how learning occurs. While we are indeed living in challenging times, we argue that this defining moment will become the impetus for pedagogical reform wherein new methods of teaching and learning will emerge. In this paper, we bring together three broad subjects of teaching and learning scholarship: (a) learning design, (b) critical pedagogy, and (c) student partnership. We contend that together, these three fields provide room for students to become actors and agents of their own learning through student-led learning design. Using critical participatory action research (CPAR) spanning 4 years and 22 projects, this case study offers a starting point for learning designers and student partners to work together in nine different instructional design models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrineau, S., Schnaas, U., Engström, A., & Härlin, F. (2016). Breaking ground and building bridges: A critical reflection on student-faculty partnerships in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2015.1120735

Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690

Churches, A. (2010). Bloom’s digital taxonomy. http://burtonslifelearning.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/26327358/BloomDigitalTaxonomy2001.pdf

Cook-Sather, A. (2016). Undergraduate students as partners in new faculty orientation and academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2016.1156543

Cook-Sather, A. (2018). Tracing the evolution of student voice in educational research. Radical Collegiality through Student Voice, 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1858-0_2

Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: a threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694

Giles, A., Martin, S. C., Bryce, D., & Hendry, G. D. (2004). Students as partners in evaluation: Student and teacher perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227227

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy.

Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472

Jensen, K., & Bennett, L. (2016). Enhancing teaching and learning through dialogue: A student and staff partnership model. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2015.1113537

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Introducing critical participatory action research. In The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research (pp. 1–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–981–4560–67–2_1

Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation, and place (Vol. 22). Routledge.

Liang, Y., Dai, K., & Matthews, K. E. (2020). Students as partners: A new ethos for the transformation of teacher and student identities in Chinese higher education. International Journal of Chinese Education, 9(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125868–12340124

Lozenski, B. D. (2014). Developing a critical eye (I), chasing a critical we: Intersections of participatory action research, crisis, and the education of Black youth (Order No. 3643640) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/e1a5dda4039f2b50b7557ec9506ab4c2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Mackay, M. (2016). Making sense of critical participatory action research. Reflections on the action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. International Practice Development Journal, 6(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.62.013

Marquis, E., Puri, V., Wan, S., Ahmad, A., Goff, L., Knorr, K., Vassileva, I., & Woo, J. (2016). Navigating the threshold of student–staff partnerships: A case study from an Ontario teaching and learning institute. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2015.1113538

Monsen, S., Cook, S., & Hannant, L. (2017). Students as partners in negotiated assessment in a teacher education course. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21), 2. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss21/2

Morris, S. [@slamteacher]. (2014, November 4) Critical pedagogy is a social justice movement first, and an educational movement second [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/slamteacher/status/529311477308485633

Perriton, L., & Reynolds, M. (2004). Critical management education. Management Learning, 35(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507604041165

Stommel, J. (2014, November 17). Critical digital pedagogy: A definition. Hybrid Pedagogy. https://hybridpedagogy.org/critical-digital-pedagogy-definition/

Stommel, J., Friend, C., & Morris, S. M. (2020). Critical digital pedagogy: A collection. Hybrid Pedagogy Incorporated.

Sweeny, R. W. (2004). ’Net_work_ed: Simulated bodies and objects intertwined in cyberplaces and art educational spaces. Threads of a critical digital pedagogy (305149474) [Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/305149474

Vince, R., Abbey, G., Langenhan, M., & Bell, D. (2018). Finding critical action learning through paradox: The role of action learning in the suppression and stimulation of critical reflection. Management Learning, 49(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507617706832

Waddell, M., & Clariza, E. (2018). Critical digital pedagogy and cultural sensitivity in the library classroom: Infographics and digital storytelling. College & Research Libraries News, 79(5), 228. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.5.228

Williamson, M. (2013). Guidance on the development and implementation of a student partnership agreement in universities. sparqs. https://www.sparqs.ac.uk/upfiles/Student%20Partnership%20Agreement%20Guidance%20-%20final%20version.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-05-10

How to Cite

Dianati, S. (2022). Students as Partners: A critical-digital partnership model for redesigning the language curriculum . International Journal for Students as Partners, 6(1), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v6i1.4807

Issue

Section

Case Studies