Students as Partners: A critical-digital partnership model for redesigning the language curriculum
Keywords:student as partners, critical pedagogy, critical-digital pedagogy, learning design, operationalisation
The global COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable and drastic changes to teaching and learning, forcing many teachers to adopt an online pedagogical approach. This disruption has caused traditional universities to change how their curriculum is delivered and also revisit how learning occurs. While we are indeed living in challenging times, we argue that this defining moment will become the impetus for pedagogical reform wherein new methods of teaching and learning will emerge. In this paper, we bring together three broad subjects of teaching and learning scholarship: (a) learning design, (b) critical pedagogy, and (c) student partnership. We contend that together, these three fields provide room for students to become actors and agents of their own learning through student-led learning design. Using critical participatory action research (CPAR) spanning 4 years and 22 projects, this case study offers a starting point for learning designers and student partners to work together in nine different instructional design models.
Barrineau, S., Schnaas, U., Engström, A., & Härlin, F. (2016). Breaking ground and building bridges: A critical reflection on student-faculty partnerships in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2015.1120735
Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Churches, A. (2010). Bloom’s digital taxonomy. http://burtonslifelearning.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/26327358/BloomDigitalTaxonomy2001.pdf
Cook-Sather, A. (2016). Undergraduate students as partners in new faculty orientation and academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2016.1156543
Cook-Sather, A. (2018). Tracing the evolution of student voice in educational research. Radical Collegiality through Student Voice, 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1858-0_2
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: a threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
Giles, A., Martin, S. C., Bryce, D., & Hendry, G. D. (2004). Students as partners in evaluation: Student and teacher perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227227
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy.
Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472
Jensen, K., & Bennett, L. (2016). Enhancing teaching and learning through dialogue: A student and staff partnership model. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2015.1113537
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Introducing critical participatory action research. In The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research (pp. 1–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–981–4560–67–2_1
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation, and place (Vol. 22). Routledge.
Liang, Y., Dai, K., & Matthews, K. E. (2020). Students as partners: A new ethos for the transformation of teacher and student identities in Chinese higher education. International Journal of Chinese Education, 9(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125868–12340124
Lozenski, B. D. (2014). Developing a critical eye (I), chasing a critical we: Intersections of participatory action research, crisis, and the education of Black youth (Order No. 3643640) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/e1a5dda4039f2b50b7557ec9506ab4c2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Mackay, M. (2016). Making sense of critical participatory action research. Reflections on the action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. International Practice Development Journal, 6(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.62.013
Marquis, E., Puri, V., Wan, S., Ahmad, A., Goff, L., Knorr, K., Vassileva, I., & Woo, J. (2016). Navigating the threshold of student–staff partnerships: A case study from an Ontario teaching and learning institute. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2015.1113538
Monsen, S., Cook, S., & Hannant, L. (2017). Students as partners in negotiated assessment in a teacher education course. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21), 2. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss21/2
Morris, S. [@slamteacher]. (2014, November 4) Critical pedagogy is a social justice movement first, and an educational movement second [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/slamteacher/status/529311477308485633
Perriton, L., & Reynolds, M. (2004). Critical management education. Management Learning, 35(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507604041165
Stommel, J. (2014, November 17). Critical digital pedagogy: A definition. Hybrid Pedagogy. https://hybridpedagogy.org/critical-digital-pedagogy-definition/
Stommel, J., Friend, C., & Morris, S. M. (2020). Critical digital pedagogy: A collection. Hybrid Pedagogy Incorporated.
Sweeny, R. W. (2004). ’Net_work_ed: Simulated bodies and objects intertwined in cyberplaces and art educational spaces. Threads of a critical digital pedagogy (305149474) [Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/305149474
Vince, R., Abbey, G., Langenhan, M., & Bell, D. (2018). Finding critical action learning through paradox: The role of action learning in the suppression and stimulation of critical reflection. Management Learning, 49(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507617706832
Waddell, M., & Clariza, E. (2018). Critical digital pedagogy and cultural sensitivity in the library classroom: Infographics and digital storytelling. College & Research Libraries News, 79(5), 228. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.5.228
Williamson, M. (2013). Guidance on the development and implementation of a student partnership agreement in universities. sparqs. https://www.sparqs.ac.uk/upfiles/Student%20Partnership%20Agreement%20Guidance%20-%20final%20version.pdf
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Seb Dianati, Robin Tonkin, Franciele Spinelli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).