Students as Partners: A critical-digital partnership model for redesigning the language curriculum


  • Seb Dianati The University of Queensland



student as partners, critical pedagogy, critical-digital pedagogy, learning design, operationalisation


The global COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable and drastic changes to teaching and learning, forcing many teachers to adopt an online pedagogical approach. This disruption has caused traditional universities to change how their curriculum is delivered and also revisit how learning occurs. While we are indeed living in challenging times, we argue that this defining moment will become the impetus for pedagogical reform wherein new methods of teaching and learning will emerge. In this paper, we bring together three broad subjects of teaching and learning scholarship: (a) learning design, (b) critical pedagogy, and (c) student partnership. We contend that together, these three fields provide room for students to become actors and agents of their own learning through student-led learning design. Using critical participatory action research (CPAR) spanning 4 years and 22 projects, this case study offers a starting point for learning designers and student partners to work together in nine different instructional design models.


Download data is not yet available.


Barrineau, S., Schnaas, U., Engström, A., & Härlin, F. (2016). Breaking ground and building bridges: A critical reflection on student-faculty partnerships in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 79–83.

Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.

Churches, A. (2010). Bloom’s digital taxonomy.

Cook-Sather, A. (2016). Undergraduate students as partners in new faculty orientation and academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 151–162.

Cook-Sather, A. (2018). Tracing the evolution of student voice in educational research. Radical Collegiality through Student Voice, 17–38.

Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: a threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186-198.

Giles, A., Martin, S. C., Bryce, D., & Hendry, G. D. (2004). Students as partners in evaluation: Student and teacher perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 681–685.

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 4(2).

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy.

Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1–10.

Jensen, K., & Bennett, L. (2016). Enhancing teaching and learning through dialogue: A student and staff partnership model. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 41–53.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Introducing critical participatory action research. In The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research (pp. 1–31). Springer.–981–4560–67–2_1

Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation, and place (Vol. 22). Routledge.

Liang, Y., Dai, K., & Matthews, K. E. (2020). Students as partners: A new ethos for the transformation of teacher and student identities in Chinese higher education. International Journal of Chinese Education, 9(2), 131–150.–12340124

Lozenski, B. D. (2014). Developing a critical eye (I), chasing a critical we: Intersections of participatory action research, crisis, and the education of Black youth (Order No. 3643640) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Mackay, M. (2016). Making sense of critical participatory action research. Reflections on the action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. International Practice Development Journal, 6(2), 1–3.

Marquis, E., Puri, V., Wan, S., Ahmad, A., Goff, L., Knorr, K., Vassileva, I., & Woo, J. (2016). Navigating the threshold of student–staff partnerships: A case study from an Ontario teaching and learning institute. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 4–15.

Monsen, S., Cook, S., & Hannant, L. (2017). Students as partners in negotiated assessment in a teacher education course. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21), 2.

Morris, S. [@slamteacher]. (2014, November 4) Critical pedagogy is a social justice movement first, and an educational movement second [Tweet]. Twitter.

Perriton, L., & Reynolds, M. (2004). Critical management education. Management Learning, 35(1), 61–77.

Stommel, J. (2014, November 17). Critical digital pedagogy: A definition. Hybrid Pedagogy.

Stommel, J., Friend, C., & Morris, S. M. (2020). Critical digital pedagogy: A collection. Hybrid Pedagogy Incorporated.

Sweeny, R. W. (2004). ’Net_work_ed: Simulated bodies and objects intertwined in cyberplaces and art educational spaces. Threads of a critical digital pedagogy (305149474) [Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Vince, R., Abbey, G., Langenhan, M., & Bell, D. (2018). Finding critical action learning through paradox: The role of action learning in the suppression and stimulation of critical reflection. Management Learning, 49(1), 86–106.

Waddell, M., & Clariza, E. (2018). Critical digital pedagogy and cultural sensitivity in the library classroom: Infographics and digital storytelling. College & Research Libraries News, 79(5), 228.

Williamson, M. (2013). Guidance on the development and implementation of a student partnership agreement in universities. sparqs.




How to Cite

Dianati, S. (2022). Students as Partners: A critical-digital partnership model for redesigning the language curriculum . International Journal for Students As Partners, 6(1), 212–222.



Case Studies