European School for Interdisciplinary Tinnitus (ESIT): A global research training initiative




internationalisation, diversity, inclusion, PhD program, cross-cultural partnerships


The European School for Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Research (ESIT) is an EU-funded doctoral training network. ESIT is a consortium of 12 universities, over 30 commercial and not‐for‐profit organizations, and 15 PhD students providing cutting-edge education across 10 European countries to develop highly knowledgeable and innovative experts in the field of tinnitus research. The ESIT consortium is composed of multidisciplinary researchers and academics engaged in supervising culturally diverse students from nine countries. Over the span of 4 years, ESIT students demonstrated transformational growth in academic and personal spheres and overcame multiple challenges. This case study documents the meaningful partnerships developed between students and the ESIT support network and some of the challenges faced by ESIT in training 15 international students during a global pandemic. It documents the co-creation of knowledge achieved by those engaged in a global shared learning journey and the conflicts and cultural dimensions that they navigated.


Download data is not yet available.


Arkoudis, S., Yu, X., Baik, C., Borland, H., Chang, S., Lang, I., Lang, J., Pearce, A. & Watty, K. (2010). Finding common ground: Enhancing interaction between domestic and international students. Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

Baklashova, T. A., & Kazakov, A. V. (2016). Challenges of international students' adjustment to a higher education institution. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(8), 1821–1832.

Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 247–260. Barrie, S. C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241.

Bolstad, R., Hipkins, R., & Stevens, L. (2014). Measuring New Zealand students' international capabilities: An exploratory study.

Clark, C. M. (2001). Good conversation. In C. M. Clark (Ed.), Talking shop: authentic conversation and teacher learning (pp. 172–182). New York: Teachers College Press.

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty: John Wiley & Sons.

Cook‐Sather, A., & Agu, P. (2013). Student consultants of color and faculty members working together toward culturally sustaining pedagogy. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 271–285.

Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477.

Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282–284.

Fallows, S., & Steven, C. (2013). Integrating key skills in higher education: Employability, transferable skills and learning for life. Routledge.

Felten, P., Gardner, J. N., Schroeder, C. C., Lambert, L. M., Barefoot, B. O., & Hrabowski, F. A. (2016). The undergraduate experience: Focusing institutions on what matters most. John Wiley & Sons.

Giannakis, M., & Bullivant, N. (2016). The massification of higher education in the UK: Aspects of service quality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 630–648.

Green, W., Hammer, S., & Star, C. (2009). Facing up to the challenge: Why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 17–29.

Jaremka, L. M., Ackerman, J. M., Gawronski, B., Rule, N. O., Sweeny, K., Tropp, L. R., Metz, M. A., Molina, L., Ryan, W. S., & Vick, S. B. (2020). Common academic experiences no one talks about: Repeated rejection, impostor syndrome, and burnout. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 519–543.

Mantai, L., & Dowling, R. (2015). Supporting the PhD journey: Insights from acknowledgements. International Journal for Researcher Development, 6(2), 106–121.

Matthews, K. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1).

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1).

Novotny, J. S. (2011). Academic resilience: Academic success as possible compensatory mechanism of experienced adversities and various life disadvantages. New Educational Review, 23(1), 91–101.

Pitman, T. (2014). Reinterpreting higher education quality in response to policies of mass education: The Australian experience. Quality in Higher Education, 20(3), 348–363.

Rometty, G. (2014, October 7). Tips for transforming a company [Conference presentation]. Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Summit 2014, Laguna Niguel, California.

Severin, A., & Egger, M. (2021). Research on research funding: An imperative for science and society. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55(12).

Spelt, E. J., Biemans, H. J., Tobi, H., Luning, P. A., & Mulder, M. (2009). Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 365–378.

Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings. Public Administration Review, 68, 334-349.

Williams, T., & Satherley, S. (2021). Getting a PhD–“How hard can it be?” In A. Blackler & E. Miller (Eds.), How to be a design academic: From learning to leading (pp. 59–82): CRC Press.




How to Cite

Shekhawat, G., Schonell, S. ., Schoisswohl, S. ., Biswas, R. ., Schiller, A. ., & Schlee, W. . (2022). European School for Interdisciplinary Tinnitus (ESIT): A global research training initiative. International Journal for Students As Partners, 6(1), 117–127.



Special Section: Partnership in fostering socially-just pedagogy