Experiences of creating digital content for teaching and learning through working in staff-student partnerships
Keywords:digital creation, student experiences, non-academic partnerships, staff experiences, students as partners
Most staff-student partnerships are carried out between students who are studying on the course the academics are teaching; this study is different in showing how skilled students work in partnership with academic staff across the university to create digital content for teaching. The students work as digital media producers (DMPs) within the institution, delivering expertise in the creation of digital content working alongside the academics who develop the subject content. This qualitative study had a small, purposive, and selected sample. Academics and the DMPs undertook focus groups to gather insights into their experiences of transforming teaching and learning into a collaborative process. Thematic data analysis and coding were utilised to generate themes, with consideration to the research objectives while analysing the transcripts. Themes appeared, such as having a central support to encourage relationships and build upon skillsets, thereby supplying the students with an authentic experience and aiding their future employment prospects.
Advance HE. (2015). Framework for student engagement through partnership. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/framework-student-engagement-through-partnership
Bakhshi, H., Downing, J. M., Osborne, M. A., & Schneider, P. (2018). The future of skills: Employment in 2030. https://futureskills.pearson.com/research/assets/pdfs/technical-report.pdf
Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. Sage.
Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. Sage.
Beetham, H. (2015). Deepening digital know-how: Building digital talent. http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6259/1/Deepening_Digital_Knowledge.pdf
Bell, J. (2010). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social sciences (5th ed.). Open University Press.
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y
Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.770264
Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176–188). The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development. https://www.brookes.ac.uk/ocsld/publications/
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195–208 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Butler-Kisber, L. (2010). Qualitative inquiry: Thematic, narrative and arts-informed perspective. Sage.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felton, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Coonan, E., & Pratt-Adams, S. (2018). Building higher education curricula fit for the future: How higher education institutions are responding to the Industrial Strategy. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-05/Building-HE-Curricula-Fit-For-The-Future.pdf
Daniels, N., Gillen, P., Casson, K., & Wilson, I. (2019). STEER: Factors to consider when designing online focus groups using audiovisual technology in health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919885786
Dollinger, M., & Lodge, J. (2020). Student-staff co-creation in higher education: An evidence-informed model to support future design and implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1663681
Flint, A. (2015). Preface: Students and staff as partners in innovation and change. Journal of Educational Innovation, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v1i1.218
Gravett, K., Kinchin, I. M., & Winstone, N. E. (2020). ‘More than customers’: Conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. HE Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Healey, M., & Healey, R. L. (2022). Students as partners and change agents in learning and teaching in higher education. Healey HE Consultants. https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=CB2DC54AB7A7EA38!260&ithint=file%2cdocx&authkey=!AC15P_CLyPaX5LA
Higgins, J. (2020, September 23). Quarter of students dissatisfied with universities’ digital teaching, Jisc survey suggests. University Business. https://universitybusiness.co.uk/news/quarter-of-students-dissatisfied-with-universities-digital-teaching-jisc-survey-suggests/
Jarvis, J., Dickerson, C., & Stockwell, L. (2013). Staff-student partnership in practice in higher education: The impact on learning and teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.085
Maguire, M. & Delahunt, B. (2017) Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AISHE-J), 8(3), 3351–33514. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335/553
Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co‐producer: Learning from public administration about the student-university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802562857
Neary, M., Saunders, G., Hagyard, A., & Derricott, D. (2014). Student as producer: Research-engaged teaching and learning—An institutional strategy. The Higher Education Academy. http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/14789/1/14789%20lincoln_ntfs_2010_project_final_report_fv.pdf
Newby, P. (2014). Research methods for education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Office for Students. (n.d.). What is the TEF? https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/teaching/what-is-the-tef/
Open University. (2020). The Open University business barometer. https://www.open.ac.uk/business/sites/www.open.ac.uk.business/files/files/OUBB-Methodology.pdf
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). (n.d.). https://www.qaa.ac.uk
Reid, D. J., & Reid, F. J. M. (2005). Online focus groups: An in-depth comparison of computer-mediated and conventional focus group discussions. International Journal of Market Research, 47(2), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530504700204
Rivaz, M., Shokrollahi, P., & Ebadi, A. (2019). Online focus group discussions: An attractive approach to data collection for qualitative health research. Journal of Nursing Practice Today, 6(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v6i1.386
Sebba, J. (2004). Developing evidence-informed policy & practice in education. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 34–43). Open University Press.
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. (2017). Online focus groups. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Charlotte Gregory-Ellis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).