Reflections on disciplinary perspectives on students as partners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.5444Downloads
References
Acai, A. (2022) Commentary on Barradell and Bell (2021)—Applying a critical lens to the role of students as partners in health professions education: Challenges, risks, and potential. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10188-6
Barnett, R. (2009). Foreword. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. xv-xvi). Routledge.
Barradell, S., & Bell, A. (2021). Is health professional education making the most of the idea of ‘students as partners’? Insights from a qualitative research synthesis. Advances in Health Science Education, 26, 513–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09998-3
Baumber, A., Kligyte, G., van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., & Pratt, S. (2020). Learning together: A transdisciplinary approach to student–staff partnerships in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1684454
Bridgstock, R. (n.d.). Students act as partners with staff and industry in a Creative Industries Network (CIN) at Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australia. In M. Healey & R. L. Healey (2023) (Eds.), Students as partners and change agents in learning and teaching in higher education: Handout. (pp. 47–49). Healey HE Consultants. https://www.healeyheconsultants.co.uk/resources
Brown, J., Collins, G., & Gratton, O. (2017). Exploring the use of student-led simulated practice learning in pre-registration nursing programmes. Nursing Standard, 32(4), 50–8. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2017.e10505
Carozzi, E. (2019, January 3). Creative industry: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education [Article]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/creative-arts-how-universities-doing-more-than-mind-elaine/
Carter, J., & Hollinsworth, D. (2017). Teaching Indigenous geography in a neo-colonial world. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(2), 182–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1290591
Chick, N. L., Haynie, A., & Gurung, R. A. R. (Eds.). (2012). Exploring more signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. Stylus.
Ciccione, A. A. (2012). Foreword. In N. L. Chick, A. Haynie, & R. A. R Gurung (Eds.), Exploring more signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. (pp. ix–xiii). Stylus.
Cleaver, E., Lintern, M., & McLinden, M. (2018). Teaching and learning in higher education: Disciplinary approaches to educational enquiry (2nd ed.). Sage.
Cook-Sather A. (2014). Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: What can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instructional Science, 42(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9292-3
Cook-Sather, A., Salmeron, D., & Smith, T. (in press). Centering humanism in STEM through student-faculty pedagogical partnerships. Frontiers in Education.
Cox, W., Alexander, A., West, H., Abzhaparova, A., & Hill, J. (2022). How to thrive when studying online. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2022.2087214
Diaz, A., Hill, J., Jenkins, R., Kay, A. E., Pye, A., Morley, D. & Garavito, N. T. (2015). A swot (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) evaluation of university student-staff partnerships in co-creating educational resources, peer support and research within stem (science, technology, engineering & mathematics) subjects. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 5(2), 161-70.
Fieldsend-Danks, P. (2016). The Dialogues project: Students as partners in developing research-engaged learning. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 15(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.15.1.89_1
Gibbs, G. (2000). Are the pedagogies of the disciplines really different? In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning through the disciplines: Proceedings of the 1999 7th International Symposium (pp. 41–51). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.
Haji Molana, H. (2022). Decolonizing geography of the Middle East: Utilizing feminist pedagogical strategies to reconstruct the classroom. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 29(11), 1546–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2021.2016653
Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 169–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445637
Healey, M. (2023). Students as partners and change agents: A selected bibliography. Healey HE Consultants. https://www.healeyheconsultants.co.uk/resources
Healey, M., Flint, A., and Harrington, K. (2014) Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Healey, M., & Healey, R. L. (2018). “It depends”: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners’ practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472
Healey, M., & Healey, R. L. (2019, November 14). Engaging students and staff in learning and teaching partnerships: Implications for educational developers [Webinar]. EHON (The Dutch Network for Educational Development in Higher Education).
Healey, M., & Healey, R. L. (2023a). Searching the literature on scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL): An academic literacies perspective Part 1.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 11. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.4
Healey, M., & Healey, R. L. (2023b). Reviewing the literature on scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL): An academic literacies perspective Part 2.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 11. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.5
Healey, M., & Healey, R. L. (2023c). Students as partners and change agents in learning and teaching in higher education: Handout.
Healey HE Consultants. https://www.healeyheconsultants.co.uk/resources
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2003). Discipline-based educational development. In R. Macdonald & H. Eggins (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development (pp. 47–57). Open University Press/SRHE.
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-undergraduate-research-and-inquiry
Healey, M., Jenkins, A., & Kneale, P. (2000). Small worlds on an interconnected planet: Teaching and learning geography in higher education. In C. Rust (Ed.) Improving student learning through the disciplines. Proceedings of the 1999 7th International Symposium (pp.125-34). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.
Healey, M., Matthews, K. E., & Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Writing about learning and teaching in higher education: Creating and contributing to scholarly conversations across a range of genres. Elon: Center for Engaged Learning Open-Access Books. https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/books/writing-about-learning/
Healey, R. L., & France, D. (2022). ‘Every partnership [… is] an emotional experience’: towards a model of partnership support for addressing the emotional challenges of student–staff partnerships. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2021391.
Hill, J., & West, H. (2020). Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908
Hill, J., Healey, R. L., West, H., & Dery, C. (2021). Pedagogic partnership in higher education: Encountering emotion in learning and enhancing student wellbeing. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(2), 167–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1661366
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Hounsell, D., & Anderson, C. (2009). Ways of thinking and practicing in biology and history. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 71–83). Routledge.
Huber, M. T., & Morreale, S. (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Jagannathan, S. (2022, November 22). Universities of the future must embrace multi-disciplinary studies. Asian Development Blog. https://blogs.adb.org/blog/universities-future-must-embrace-multi-disciplinary-studies
Kreber, C. (Ed.). (2009). The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. Routledge.
Liatis, T., Patel, B., Huang, M., Buren, L., & Kotsadam, G. (2020). Student involvement in global veterinary education and curricula: 7 years of progress (2013–2019). Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(4), 379–83. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.2018-0021
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, L. S., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Ten years on (pp. 412–24). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.
Middendorf, J. & Shopkow, L. (2018). Overcoming student learning bottlenecks: Decode the critical thinking of your discipline. Stylus.
Moore-Cherry, N. (2019). Pedagogical partnerships, identity building and self-authorship in geography higher education. In H. Walkington, J. Hill, & S. Dyer (Eds.), The handbook of teaching and learning in geography (pp. 314–28). Edward Elgar.
Murphy, M. P. A., Heffernan, A., Dunton, C., & Arsenault, A. C. (2023). The disciplinary scholarship of teaching and learning in political science and international relations: Methods, topics, and impact. International Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-022-00425-5
Pace, D. (2009). Opening history’s ‘black boxes’: Decoding the disciplinary unconscious of historians. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. (pp. 96–104). Routledge.
QAA. (2022). Subject benchmark statement: Geography (5th edition). https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/sbs/sbs-geography-22.pdf?sfvrsn=29addc81_2
Repko, A. F., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. P. (2020). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Sage.
Rouse, M., Phillips, J., Mehaffey, R., McGowan, S., & Felten, P. (2017). Decoding and disclosure in students-as-partners research: A case study of the political science literature review. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3061
Smith, H. A., & Yahlnaaw (2021). Disruption as reconciliation: Lessons learned when students as partners become students as teachers. In: H. A. Smith & D. J. Hornsby (Eds.) Teaching international relations in a time of disruption. Political pedagogies. (pp. 37-48). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56421-6_4
Stigmar, M. (2016). Peer-to-peer teaching in higher education: A critical literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(2), 124–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963
Symonds, E. (2021). Negotiating partnership models in the humanities: The possibility of collaboration within undergraduate English courses. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 20(3), 231–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022220944827
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2002). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
Vanstone, M., & Grierson, L. (2019). Medical student strategies for actively negotiating hierarchy in the clinical environment. Medical Education, 53(10), 1013–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13945
Weimer, M. (1993). The disciplinary journals of pedagogy. Change, 25(6), November–December, 44–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40165020
West, H., Hill, J., Abzhaparova, A., Cox, W., & Alexander, A. (2023). Pandemic pedagogies: Reflecting on online learning using the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2023.2190962
Woolmer, C., Sneddon, P., Curry, G., Hill, B., Fehertavi, S., Longbone, C., & Wallace, K. (2016). Student staff partnership to create an interdisciplinary science skills course in a research intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113969
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mick Healey, Ruth Healey, Harry West
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).