An undergraduate peer mentoring program at a Canadian university: Impact on student learning as perceived by instructors, peer mentors, and students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4553

Keywords:

peer mentoring, students as partners (SaP), undergradute teaching, STEM education, qualitative surveys

Abstract

Large undergraduate courses make it difficult for students to achieve learning outcomes, in part due to the lack of resources available to course instructors to support student learning in these intimidating and often impersonal settings. One way to support instructor teaching and student learning is the implementation of undergraduate peer mentoring programs, which capitalize on the Students-as-Partners framework. Undergraduate mentors’ relatability to their peers and their mastery of the course content make them excellent resources. This paper describes the development and implementation of a university-wide undergraduate peer mentoring program at McGill University in Canada and its impact on student learning as perceived by three populations: instructors, peer mentors, and students. Data on perceived learning was gathered through qualitative surveys. This case study presents one implementation model that may guide and inform the implementation of similar programs at other higher education institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bryson, C. (2016). Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2016.1124966

Colvin, J. W., & Ashman, M. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678879

Crouch, C. H. (2009). PEER INSTRUCTION: An Interactive Approach for Large Lecture Classes. Optics and Photonics News. https://doi.org/10.1364/opn.9.9.000037

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249

Crouch, C. H., Watkins, J., Fagen, A. P., & Mazur, E. (2007). Peer Instruction: Engaging Students One-on-One, All At Once. Research-Based Reform of University Physics.

Danker, B. (2017). Using Flipped Classroom Approach to Explore Deep Learning in Large Classrooms. IAFOR Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.3.1.10

Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2003). Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms. The Physics Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1474140

Fingerson, L., & Culley, A. B. (2006). Collaborators in Teaching and Learning: Undergraduate Teaching Assistants in the Classroom. Teaching Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319189

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2018). Students as Partners: Reflections on a Conceptual Model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3

Hill, R., & Reddy, P. (2010). Undergraduate Peer Mentoring: An Investigation into Processes, Activities and Outcomes. Psychology Learning & Teaching. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2007.6.2.98

Mazur, E. (2008). Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.53199

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., … Swaim, K. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education. International Journal for Students as Partners. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119

Philipp, S., Tretter, T., & Rich, C. (2016). Research and Teaching: Development of Undergraduate Teaching Assistants as Effective Instructors in STEM Courses. Journal of College Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst16_045_03_74

Schell, J., & Mazur, E. (2015). Flipping the Chemistry Classroom with Peer Instruction. In Chemistry Education: Best Practices, Opportunities and Trends. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679300.ch13

Smith, T. (2008). Integrating undergraduate peer mentors into liberal arts courses: A pilot study. Innovative Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755–0 07–9 064–6

Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., Chiu, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (2017). Do teaching assistants matter? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373

Zher, N. H., Hussein, R. M. R., & Saat, R. M. (2016). Enhancing Feedback via Peer Learning in Large Classrooms. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-17

How to Cite

Petrescu, D. S., Yazdani, A., VanderSchee, C. R., Bailey, C. A., Covens, F., & Harpp, D. N. (2021). An undergraduate peer mentoring program at a Canadian university: Impact on student learning as perceived by instructors, peer mentors, and students. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4553

Issue

Section

Case Studies