Partnering with students to redesign an introductory chemistry laboratory course: An exploration of the process and implications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.5260

Keywords:

students as partners (SaP), STEM education, course redesign

Abstract

The most effective teaching and learning environments are those in which students are involved as active partners with faculty, and the greatest impact occurs when faculty go beyond asking students for feedback and instead involve them in design, production, and implementation. In this paper, we explore the process of student-faculty co-creation by presenting a specific case involving students as partners in the redesign of an introductory chemistry laboratory course to incorporate more group learning, support students’ skill development, and increase students’ sense of belonging in chemistry. This case study investigates how faculty can set up and structure a successful co-design partnership and attend to potential challenges as well as how educational developers and teaching centers can work in partnership with faculty and students to design or redesign courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bovill, C. (2017). A framework to explore roles within student-staff partnerships in higher education: Which students are partners, when, and in what ways? International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3062

Bovill, C. (2019). A co-creation of learning and teaching typology: What kind of co-creation are you planning or doing? International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3953

Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4

Bovill, C., & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8

Bunnell, S., Lyster, M., Greenland, K., Mayer, G., Gardner, K., Leise, T., Kristensen, T., Ryan, E. D., Ampiah-Bonney, R., & Jaswal, S. S. (2021). From protest to progress through partnership with students: Being human in STEM (HSTEM). International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(1), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i1.4243

Charkoudian, L. K., Bitners, A.C., Bloch, N. B., & Nawal, S. (2015). Dynamic discussion and informed improvements: Student-led revision of first-semester organic chemistry. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(15). https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss15/5

Chukwu, A., &, Jones, K. (2020). Feminist interventions in engineering: Co-creating across disciplines and identities. In A. Cook-Sather & C. Wilson (Eds.), Building courage, confidence, and capacity in learning and teaching through pedagogical partnership: Stories from across contexts and arenas of practice. Lexington Books.

Cook-Sather, A., Bahti, M., & Ntem, A. (2019). Pedagogical partnerships. Elon University Center for Engaged Learning. https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa1

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., Felten, P., & Cook, M. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Cook-Sather, A., White, H., Aramburu, T., Samuels, C., & Wynkoop, P. (2021). Moving toward greater equity and inclusion in STEM through pedagogical partnership. In A. Beach, C. Henderson, N. Finkelstein, S. Simkins, G. Weaver, & K. White (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Accelerating systemic change in higher education. ASCN.

Delpish, A., Holmes, A., Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., Darby, A., King, K., & Felten, P. (2010). Equalizing voices: Student-faculty partnership in course design. In C. Werder & M. M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning (pp. 96–114). Stylus.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. MacMillan.

Giroux, H. A., Penna, A. N., & Pinar, W. (1981). Curriculum & instruction: Alternatives in education. McCutchan.

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. HE Academy.

Jardine, H. E. (2020). Positioning undergraduate teaching and learning assistants as instructional partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i1.4032

Könings, K. D., Bovill, C., & Woolner, P. (2017). Towards an interdisciplinary model of practice for participatory building design in education. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12230

Latin, A. (2022). Belonging in biology: Working through pedagogical partnership for social justice in STEM. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(35). https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss35/3

Little, S. (Ed.). (2011) Staff-student partnerships in higher education. Continuum.

Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2018). Students as partners in learning and teaching: The benefits of co-creation of the curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3207

Martens, S. E., Meeuwissen, S. N. E., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Bovill, C., & Könings, K. D. (2019). Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: Disentangling the terminology and approaches. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1203–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1615610

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Mihans, R. J., Long, D. T., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2019). Qualitative data analysis (4th ed.). Sage.

Narayanan, D., & Abbot, S. (2020). Increasing the participation of underrepresented minorities in STEM classes through student-instructor partnerships. In L. Mercer-Mapstone & S. Abbot (Eds.), The power of partnership (pp. 181–195). Elon University Center for Engaged Learning Open Access Series. https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa2

National Science Foundation, & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd

Rivers, J., Smith, A. B., Higgins, D., Mills, R., Maier, A. G., & Howitt, S. M. (2017). Asking and answering questions: Partners, peer learning, and participation. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3072

Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. J. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. C. E. Merrill.

Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. University of Chicago Press.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-04

How to Cite

Jardine, H. E., Frome, G., & Campbell Griffith, E. (2023). Partnering with students to redesign an introductory chemistry laboratory course: An exploration of the process and implications. International Journal for Students as Partners, 7(1), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.5260

Issue

Section

Case Studies