Reflecting on vulnerability, skill-building, and identity in an interdisciplinary SaP project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5590Keywords:
Literacy, Rural, Community-based, Reflection, PartnershipAbstract
Launched in 2021 by a team of undergraduate students, university faculty, associate researchers, and community partners collaborating as genuine equals in a diverse team, the Together Time Story Sacks intergenerational literacies program forms part of an ongoing action research project aimed at understanding and addressing barriers that residents of rural regions face in accessing literacies programming. In this paper, six team members who co-imagined, co-designed and co-implemented Together Time but occupy different roles on and beyond university campuses reflect on the ways the students-as-partners (SaP) model, through which we brought Together Time to life, shaped both our process and our outputs during the project’s pilot phase (September 2021–August 2022). We suggest that empowering humans with diverse academic and lived experiences through the SaP model is an Invigorating, messy, and, at times, nerve-racking process but an eminently fruitful enterprise that, in our opinion, produces rich research with and for our community while transforming our understanding of education and ourselves.
Downloads
References
Choi, B. C., & Pak, A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale, 29(6), 351–364.
Curran, R. (2017). Students as partners—Good for students, good for staff: A study on the impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff engagement. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3089
Feltman, C. (2008). The thin book of trust: An essential primer for building trust at work (1st ed.). Thin Book Publishing.
Flett, G., Khan, A., & Su, C. (2019). Mattering and psychological well-being in college and university students: Review and recommendations for campus-based initiatives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00073-6
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014, July). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Neary, M. (2010). Student as producer: A pedagogy for the avant-garde? Learning Exchange, 1(1), Article 1. http://studentasproducer.lincoln.ac.uk/files/2014/03/15-72-1-pb-1.pdf
Smith, H., Verwoord, R., & Veitch, C. (2019). Unpacking power hierarchies in students as partners practices. BCcampus Research Report. https://bccampus.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/BCCampus-Research-Report-Unpacking-Power-Hierarchies-in-Students-as-Partners-Practices.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Matthew Dunleavy, Susan Andrews, Carla VanBeselaere, Christelinda Laureijs, Shannon Goguen, Denise Roy-Loar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).