A mixed-method investigation of faculty perspectives on the benefits and challenges of engaging in student partnership activities in science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5635

Keywords:

Student-faculty partnerships, pedagogical partnerships, collaborative learning, science, faculty-partners, faculty perspectives

Abstract

There is a growing interest within higher education to engage with students as partners to reposition students from consumers to producers of knowledge. The purpose of this study was to gather insights into the benefits, barriers/challenges, and best practices for engaging in student-faculty partnership activities for science faculty members. Supervising or working with graduate teaching assistants, working with students on university committees, collaborating with undergraduate or graduate students on a new or existing research project, and co-authoring manuscripts with graduate students were regarded as the most impactful partnership activities. Common benefits of student partnership activities included: collaboration and relationship building, broadening perspectives and gaining feedback, personal satisfaction, and institutional and career-related benefits. Common barriers/challenges reported were interpersonal dynamics and maintaining relationships, student management, and external influences. Best practices consisted of planning and setting expectations, developing students’ agency, using open communication, and facilitating peer-to-peer collaboration and peer mentoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhadad, S. S. J., Vasco, D., Williams, J. C., Dizon, P., Kapnias, R. L., Khan, S. B., Payne, H., Simpson, B. C., & Warren, C. D. (2021). Learning, unlearning, and relearning together: Unmasking power in a students as partners program using collaborative autoethnography. Student Success, 12(2), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1934

Begley, G. S., Berkey, B., Roe, L., & Schuldt, H. E. Y. (2019). Becoming partners: Faculty come to appreciate undergraduates as teaching partners in a service-learning teaching assistant program. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3669

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4

Bovill, C., Felten, P., & Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching (2): Practical guidance for academic staff and academic developers [Conference presentation]. International Consortium on Educational Development, Stockholm.

Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach to health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1⁠–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282

Chadha, D., Inguva, P. K., Bui Le, L., & Kogelbauer, A. (2023). How far do we go? Involving students as partners for redesigning teaching. Educational Action Research, 31(4), 620–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2022.2058974

Chittle, L., King, A., Sood, S., Hinch, I., Houser, C., Cavallo-Medved, D. (in-press). Fostering students as partners: A faculty-wide examination of science undergraduate and graduate students' perspectives of pedagogical partnerships. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

Cook-Sather, A., Bahti, M., & Ntem, A. (2019). Pedagogical partnerships. A how-to guide for faculty, students, and academy developers in higher education. Centre for Engaged Learning Open Access Book Series. https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/pedagogical-partnerships.pdf

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

Curran, R. (2017). Students as partners—Good for students, good for staff: A study on the impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff engagement. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3089

Curtin, A. L., & Sarju, J. P. (2021). Students as partners: Co-creation of online learning to deliver high quality, personalized content. In E. Pearsall (Ed.), Advances in online chemistry education (pp. 135–163). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2021-1389.ch010

Curtis, N. A., & Anderson, R. D. (2021). Moving toward student-faculty partnership in systems-level assessment: A qualitative analysis. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i1.4204

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Felten, P., (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.121

Graneheim, U. H., Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

Hall, R. (2021). Students as partners in university innovation and entrepreneurship. Education & Training, 63(7–8), 1114–1137. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2021-0003

Hamerski, P. C., Irving, P. W., & McPadden, D. (2021). Learning assistants as student partners in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2). https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020107

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy.

Healey, M., Flint, A., Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3

Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2019). Students as partners guide: Student engagement through partnership a guide to the advance HE framework. AdvanceHE. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mick-Healey/publication/338096919_Students_as_Partners_Guide_Student_Engagement_Through_Partnership_A_guide_to_the_Advance_HE_Framework/links/5e402bf2299bf1cdb91bd14b/Students-as-Partners-Guide-Student-Engagement-Through-Partnership-A-guide-to-the-Advance-HE-Framework.pdf

Johnston, J., & Ryan, B. (2022). From students-as-partners theory to students-as-partners practice: Reflecting on staff-student collaborative partnership in an academic development context. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–27.

Knapp, T. R. (1990). Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: An attempt to resolve the controversy. Nursing Research, 39(2), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199003000-00019

Kondracki, N. L., Wellman, N. S., & Amundson, D. R. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34(4), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3

Kowalski, K., C., McHugh T. F., Sabiston, C. M., & Ferguson, L. J. (2018). Research Methods in Kinesiology. Oxford University Press.

Larson, L. M., Seipel, M. T., Shelley, M. C., Gahn, S. W., Ko, S. Y., Schenkenfelder, M., Rover, D. T., Schmittmann, B., & Heitmann, M. M. (2019). The academic environment and faculty well-being: The role of psychological needs. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748667

Liang, Y., & Matthews, K. E. (2021). Students as partners practices and theorisations in Asia: A scoping review. Higher Education Research and Development, 40(3), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1773771

Luo, B., Matthews, K., & Chunduri, P. (2019). “Commitment to collaboration”: What students have to say about the values underpinning partnership practices. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3688

Marquis, E. (2018). Embracing and/or avoiding the risks of partnership: A faculty perspective. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(24), 1–8. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss24/9

Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315

Matthews, K.E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L., & Turner, J. (2018). Conceptions of students as partners. Higher Education, 76(6), 957–971. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45116838

Matthews, K. E., Groenendijk, L. J., & Chunduri, P. (2017). We want to be more involved: Student perceptions of students as partners across the degree program curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3063

Matthews, K. E., Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Acai, A., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Healey, M., Healey, R. L., & Marquis, E. (2019). Enhancing outcomes and reducing inhibitors to the engagement of students and staff in learning and teaching partnerships: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(3), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1545233

Maunder, R. E. (2021). Staff and student experiences of working together on pedagogic research projects: Partnerships in practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1205–1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1809999

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students As Partners, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119

Milne, J., & Oberle K. (2005). Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: a case study. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 32(6), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1097/00152192-200511000-00014

Neuendorf, K. (2017). The content analysis guidebook. Sage.

Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Sage.

Petrescu, D. S., Yazdani, A., VanderSchee, C. R., Bailey, C. A., Covens, F., & Harpp, D. N. (2021). An undergraduate peer mentoring program at a Canadian university: Impact on student learning as perceived by instructors, peer mentors, and students. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4553

Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g

Sandelowski, M. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362

Smith, J. L., Handley, I. M., Rushing, S., Belou, R., Shanahan, E. A., Skewes, M. C., Kambich, L., Honea, J., & Intemann, K. (2018). Added benefits: How supporting women faculty in STEM improves everyone’s job satisfaction. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000066

Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357

Sullivan, G. & Artino, A. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data From Likert-Type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 5(4). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18

Sullivan-Bolyai S., Bova C., & Harper D. (2005). Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: The use of qualitative description. Nursing Outlook, 53(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005

Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. The Falmer Press.

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837–851.

Wu, H., & Leung, S., (2017). Can Likert Scales be treated as interval scales?—A simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775

Downloads

Published

2024-10-15

How to Cite

Chittle, L., Laios, E., King, A., Hinch, I., Sood, S., Sorge, A., Milidrag, L., Houser, C., & Cavallo-Medved, D. (2024). A mixed-method investigation of faculty perspectives on the benefits and challenges of engaging in student partnership activities in science. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(2), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5635

Issue

Section

Research Articles