Research partnerships as transformational learning experiences

Reflection on a research partnership

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5785

Keywords:

PI/RA partnerships, transformative learning, post-secondary research parnerships, research as learning

Abstract

A common partnership between faculty and students in post-secondary education is that of researcher as a primary investigator (PI) and research assistant (RA). In this reflective essay, we examine an unconventional research partnership between Allison, a PI, and Bailey, an RA.  Our experiences as PI and RA prompted us to reflect upon our learning partnership. We asked: In what ways might the role of RA be transformative (Mezirow, 1994) in teacher education for both researcher and student when it is approached through partnership? This partnership is unique because of its relational approach, where the PI and the RA collaborated in making decisions about the direction of the RA work. The RA’s perspective offered a different viewpoint on the research focus through which the researcher aimed to gain insights. This approach altered the dynamics of the research partnership, which evolved along the lines of both partners acting as equal contributors and co-learners through the research process. In this paper, we reflect on our consequential learning. Specifically, we focus on the learning that occurred when Bailey self-directed RA work on the topics of radical imagination, restorative justice, and appreciative inquiry, as well as the insights Allison gained through Bailey’s work. We use “I” in our respective sections and “we” and “our” in our collective writing, and we also refer to ourselves in the third person for clarity when needed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. Sage publications.

Brew, A., & Peseta, T. (2009). Supervision development and recognition in a reflexive space. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 138–152). Routledge.

Bruce, C., & Stoodley, I. (2013). Experiencing higher degree research supervision as teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.576338

Cook-Sather, A. (2016). Introduction: Mentoring and supervision reconceived as partnership. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(19). https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss19/1

Eliot, T.S. (1942). Four quartets. Harcourt, Brace and Co. https://www.fadedpage.com/link.php?file=20191242.mobi

Kitchenham, A. (2008). The evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 6(2), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344608322678

Khasnabish, D. A., & Haiven, M. (2014). The radical imagination: Social movement research in the age of austerity. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Mezirow, J. (1994). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369404400403

Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2018). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 818–838). Sage.

Whiteside, U., Pantelone, D. W., Hunter-Reel, D., Eland, J., Kleiber, B., & Larimer, M. (2007). Initial suggestions for supervising and mentoring undergraduate research assistants at large research universities. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 325–330.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-15

How to Cite

Tucker, A., & Chitty, B. (2024). Research partnerships as transformational learning experiences: Reflection on a research partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5785

Issue

Section

Reflective Essays