How can students-as-partners work inform assessment?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.5453Downloads
References
Andrews, M., Brown, R., & Mesher, L. (2018). Engaging students with assessment and feedback: Improving assessment for learning with students as partners. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 32–46.
Bovill, C., Matthews, K. E., & Hinchcliffe, T. (2021). Student partnerships in assessment. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/student-partnership-assessment-spia
Chase, M. K. (2020). Student voice in STEM classroom assessment practice: A pilot intervention. Journal of Research & Practice in Assessment, 15(2). https://www.rpajournal.com/student-voice-in-stem-classroom-assessment-practice-a-pilot-intervention/
Cook-Sather, A. (2009). From traditional accountability to shared responsibility: The benefits and challenges of student consultants gathering midcourse feedback in college classrooms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956042
Cook-Sather, A. (2021). Responding to twin pandemics: Reconceptualizing assessment practices for equity and justice. Research & Practice in Assessment, 16(2). https://www.rpajournal.com/responding-to-twin-pandemics/
Cook-Sather, A., Signorini, A., Dorantes, S., Abuan, M., Covarrubias-Oregel, G., & Cribb, P. (2020). “I never realized…”: Shared outcomes of different student-faculty partnership approaches to assessing student learning experiences and evaluating faculty teaching. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(7). https://www.articlegateway.com/index.php/JHETP/article/view/3160/3004
Curtis, N. A., & Anderson, R. D. (2021a). Moving toward student-faculty partnership in systems-level assessment: A qualitative analysis. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i1.4204
Curtis, N., & Anderson, R. (2021b, May). A framework for developing student-faculty partnerships in program-level student learning outcomes assessment (Occasional Paper No. 53). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA). https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/OccPaper53_Partnership.pdf
Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551Deeley, S. J., & Brown, R. A. (2014). Learning through partnership in assessment. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 13. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss13/3
Del Rosso, J., & Nordstrom-Wehner, B. (2020). Team grade anarchy: A conversation about the troubled transition of grading. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 30. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss30/5
El-Mowafy, A. (2014). Using peer assessment of fieldwork to enhance students’ practical training. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.820823
Gaberson, K. B., Oermann, M. H., & Shellenbarger, T. (2018). Clinical teaching strategies in nursing (5th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826140036
Inoue, A. B. (2015). Antiracist writing assessment ecologies: Teaching and assessing writing for a socially just future. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/inoue/ecologies.pdf
Loglie, C. (2019). Culturally responsive assessment 2.0: Revisiting the quest for equity and quality in student learning. Journal of Research & Practice in Assessment, 14(2). https://www.rpajournal.com/culturally-responsive-assessment-2-0-revisiting-the-quest-for-equity-and-quality-in-student-learning/
Joseph, S., Rickett, C., Northcote, M., & Christian, B. J. (2020). ‘Who are you to judge my writing?’: Student collaboration in the co-construction of assessment rubrics. New Writing, 17(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2019.1566368
Kearney, S. (2019). Transforming the first-year experience through self and peer assessment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.5.3
Matthews, K. E., Sherwood, C., Enright, E., & Cook-Sather, A. (2023). What do students and teachers talk about when they talk together about feedback and assessment? Expanding notions of feedback literacy through pedagogical partnership. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2170977
Meer, N., & Chapman, A. (2014). Co-creation of marking criteria: Students as partners in the assessment process. Business and Management Education in HE, 1–15. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.11120/bmhe.2014.00008?needAccess=true
Montenegro, E., & Jankowski, N. A. (2020, January). A new decade for assessment: Embedding equity into assessment praxis (Occasional Paper No. 42). University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA). www.learningoutcomesassessment.org
Montenegro, E., & Jankowski, N. A. (2017, January). Equity and assessment: Moving towards culturally responsive assessment (Occasional Paper No. 29). University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA).
Ott, M. C., Cristancho, S., Chin, M., Van Koughnett, J. A., & Ott, M. (2022). “The most crushing thing”: Understanding resident assessment burden in a competency-based curriculum. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(5), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00050.1
Oyelere, S., Paliktzoglou, V., & Suhonen, J. (2016). M-learning in Nigerian higher education: An experimental study with Edmodo. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 4(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2016.075055
Paliktzoglou, V., & Suhonen, J. (2014a). Facebook as an assisted learning tool in problem-based learning: The Bahrain case. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2014.059694
Paliktzoglou, V., & Suhonen, J. (2014b). Microblogging in higher education: The Edmodo case study among computer science learners in Finland. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 16(2), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2014040104
Paliktzoglou, V., & Suhonen, J. (2015). Microblogging as an assisted learning tool in problem-based learning (PBL) in Bahrain: The Edmodo Case. In F. Cipolla-Ficarra (Ed.), Handbook of research on interactive information quality in expanding social network communications (pp. 184–201), IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7377-9
Watling, C. J., & Ginsburg, S. (2019). Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Medical Education, 53(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13645
Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alison Cook-Sather, Sarah Slates, Anita Acai, Shaun Aquilina, Khairulnissa Ajani, Karen Arm, Mailie Besson, Julia Brennan, Maddie Brockbank, Katherine Carter, Shanaz Cassum, Carolyn Clampton, Russell Crawford, Nicholas Curtis, Jasmin Dhanoa, Pilar Alderete Diez, Gareth Evans, Robert Fleisig, Amanda Kelly Ferguson, Kulsoom Ghias, Chahna Gonsalves, Sima Hassan, Martin Hawes, Kauser Jabeen, Natasha Jankowski, Sadaf Khan, Jamie Kim, Suzanna Klaf, Alice Lesnick, Omar Mahmud, Jawaher Matiullah, Emma Medland, India Merrony, Shehnaaz Mohamed, Katie Moisse, Noelia Noel, Vasileios Paliktzoglou, John Parkin, Joy Perkins, Mary Pryor, Saniya Sabzwari, Tahmina Shamsheri, Abeer Siddiqui, Adriana Signorini, Mike Streule, Samu Turi, William Wilkinson, Marie Wilson, Joanna Wilson-Scott, Naomi Winstone
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
