Midterm conversations as co-creation of equitable and inclusive formative assessment
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5466Mots-clés :
co-creation, assessment, equitable, inclusive, self-directedRésumé
Although assessment of student learning remains a thorny area for co-creation in education, a growing number of researchers and practitioners advocate and enact partnership in formative and summative assessment as part of equity work. In this case study, we join these efforts in reflecting on students’ and our own experiences of the midterm conversation that we use as a key formative assessment structure and process across three co-facilitated courses. The midterm conversation—a partnership among students and instructors as co-teachers—is embedded in course design and curriculum with the goal of advancing, informing, and sustaining our pedagogical commitments. This case illustrates how we practice assessment as dialogue and as emergent understanding. This practice is based on an expectation of diverse learning goals and outcomes and on trust in students’ capacities to direct their learning with reference to their own interests and standards for their work.
Téléchargements
Références
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79, 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Cook-Sather, A. (2021). Responding to twin pandemics: Reconceptualizing assessment practices for equity and justice. Research & Practice in Assessment, 16(2). https://www.rpajournal.com/responding-to-twin-pandemics/
Cook-Sather, A. (2022). Co-creating equitable teaching and learning: Structuring student voice into higher education. Harvard Education Press.
Cook-Sather, A. (2023, February 22). Assigning “accountability partners” to support student engagement, learning, and growth. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/equality-inclusion-and-diversity/assigning-accountability-partners-to-support-student-engagement-learning-and-growth/
Cook-Sather, A., Lesnick, A., & Cohen, J. (2003). “‘My body will remember even if my mind doesn’t:’ Remembering the body in learning and teaching.” In Multiple intelligences and new methods of college teaching: Articles by Howard Gardner and 41 educators. Center for the Imagination in Language Learning.
Curtis, N. A., & Anderson, R. D. (2021). Moving toward student-faculty partnership in systems-level assessment: A qualitative analysis. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i1.4204
Dargusch, J., Harris, L., & Bearman. M. (2023). “How to look at it differently”: Negotiating more inclusive assessment design with student partners. In R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, D. Boud, & T. Jorre de St Jorre (Eds.), Assessment for inclusion in higher education: Promoting equity and social justice in assessment (pp. 211–221). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003293101-23
Deeley, S. J. (2014). Summative co-assessment: A deep learning approach to enhancing employability skills and attributes. Active learning in higher education, 15(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514649
Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff-student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Deeley, S. J., & Brown, R. A. (2014). Learning through partnership in assessment. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 13. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss13/3
Del Rosso, J. & Nordstrom-Wehner, B. (2020). Team grade anarchy: A conversation about the troubled transition of grading. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 30. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss30/5
Guberman, D. (2020). Grading together: Toward a partnership approach. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 29. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss29/6
Horton, M. & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Temple University Press.
Lesnick, A., Cohen, J., & Cook-Sather, A. (2007). “Working the tensions: Constructing educational studies within a liberal arts context.” In C. Bjork, D. K. Johnston, & H. Ross, (Eds.), Taking teaching seriously: How liberal arts colleges prepare teachers to meet today’s educational challenges in school. Paradigm Publishers.
Montenegro, E., & Jankowski, N. A. (2020, January). A new decade for assessment: Embedding equity into assessment praxis (Occasional Paper No. 42). University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA). https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/A-New-Decade-for-Assessment.pdf
Morris, C., Milton, E., & Goldstone, R. (2019). Case study: Suggesting choice: Inclusive assessment processes. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1): 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1669479
Whysel, B. (2022, December 7). Can we improve grading by collaborating with students? Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/educational-assessment/can-we-improve-grading-by-collaborating-with-students/
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Alice Lesnick, Alison Cook-Sather, Sabea K. Evans, Margo Schall, Chanelle Wilson 2023
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
