Student Led Observations for Course Improvement (SLOCI)
Closing the loop in course enhancement
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5578Mots-clés :
course enhancement, student feedback, learning designRésumé
As universities strive to enhance course delivery and the student experience, typical end-of-semester course evaluations have been demonstrated to provide insufficient and potentially biased detail for course improvement and innovation. The Student Led Observations for Course Improvement (SLOCI) team at The University of Queensland aims to provide high-quality student experience data through a student-led approach. The team comprises current undergraduate university students who have a basic understanding of pedagogical strategies and methods of evaluation, bridging the gap between students and academics. SLOCI utilises a course partnership model to work with academics to identify key research questions that can direct and inform a process of real-time feedback. Since 2018, SLOCI has conducted 48 single-semester course partnerships and nine research partnerships focussed on other aspects of the student experience. The student experience data generated from these collaborations has underpinned improvements resulting in higher student engagement and better learning outcomes.
Téléchargements
Références
Anderson, A., Austin, D., Walton, C., Wood, A., Houlihan, A., Hard, E., & Bailey, K. (2023). Planning for co-curricular design-student voice, power dynamics and threshold learning: A thematic analysis of the student perspective. International Journal for Students as Partners, 7(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.4937
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Brinkworth, R., McCann, B., Matthews, C., & Nordström, K. (2009). First year expectations and experiences: Student and teacher perspectives. Higher Education, 58(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9188-3
Brown, M. J. (2008). Student perceptions of teaching evaluations. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35, 177–181.
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
Fleming, M., Kavanagh, L., Reidsema, C., Waris, A., Lee, M., Liu, S., & Kara-Manning, R. (2018). Students as partners: Developing a dialogue for change. Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE) 2018 Conference.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
Kapadia, S. (2021). Academic representation and students as partners: Bridging the gap. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 169-173. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4461
MacNell, L., Driscoll, A. & Hunt, A.N. (2015). What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching. Asian Social Science, 40, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
Rowe, A. D., & Wood, L. N. (2008). Student perceptions and preferences for feedback. Asian Social Science, 4(3), 78–88. https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/student-perceptions-and-preferences-for-feedback
Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
Wolbring, T., & Treischl, E. (2016). Selection bias in students’ evaluation of teaching: Causes of student absenteeism and its consequences for course ratings and rankings. Research in Higher Education, 57(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9378-7
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Shaun McAnally, Julia Buczynski, Lydia Kavanagh 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
