Closing the loop: An evaluation of student-led module feedback at one UK higher education institution

Authors

  • Cecile Tschirhart London Metropolitan University
  • Simon David Pratt-Adams Anglia Ruskin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3554

Keywords:

survey, student experience, student-staff partnership, learning and teaching enhancement, staff experience

Abstract

This article describes how a Student-Led Module Feedback (SLMF) scheme was initiated at one UK University to enhance staff-student relationships and to improve student outcomes. The scheme was developed by academics in partnership with the Students Union (SU) and students. The SLMF aimed to enhance the student experience at a granular level in “real time” during 30 week-long teaching modules. The article defines the SLMF within the research context of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and describes how the theme of student-staff partnership runs across the scheme, including during the project management and evaluation phases. It critically reflects on how the scheme has been instrumental in making inroads to improving the experience of students and staff across the university. It analyses the way in which the SLMF is being used by staff and students to co-create action plans to initiate pedagogical changes and thus close the loop of the feedback cycle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Cecile Tschirhart, London Metropolitan University

Please note Cecile Tschirhart is the primary author, and Simon Pratt-Adams is the secondary author and should be listed in the appropriate order

References

Allin, L. (2014). Collaboration between staff and students in the scholarship of teaching and
learning: The potential and the problems. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 2(1), pp. 95-102. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.2.1.95
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and
teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Curran, R. (2017). Students as partners—good for students, good for staff: A study on the
impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff engagement. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3089
Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2011). Higher education: Students at the
heart of the system. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/higher-education-white-paper-students-at-the-heart-of-the-system
Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2016). Success as a knowledge economy:
Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/higher-education-success-as-a-knowledge-economy-white-paper
Dunne, E., & Owen, D. (2013). The student engagement handbook. Bingley: Emerald Group
Publishing.
Dunne, E., & Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as change agents: New ways of engaging with
learning and teaching in higher education. York: ESCalate, HEA Subject Centre for Education.
Felten, P. (2017). Emotion and partnerships. International Journal for Students as Partners,
1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3070
Fluckiger, J., Tixier y Vigil, Y., Pasco, R., & Danielson, K. (2010). Formative feedback: Involving
students as partners in assessment to enhance learning. College Teaching, 58(4), pp. 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.484031
Healey, M., & Healey, R.L. (2018). “It depends”: Exploring the context-dependent nature of
10 students as partners’ practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as
partners in teaching and learning in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and
effectiveness. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), pp. 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292548
McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co‐producer: Learning from public administration
about the student-university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), pp. 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802562857
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P.,
Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Raftery, J. (2018). A university turnaround: Adaptive leadership at London Metropolitan
University, 2014 to 2018. Higher Education Policy Institute Policy Note, 9. Retrieved from https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/EMBARGOED-UNTIL-18-OCT-2018-Policy-Note-9-A-University-Turnaround_Screen.pdf
Ramsden, P. (2008). The future of higher education: Teaching and the student experience.
York: Higher Education Academy.
Ratcliffe, A., & Dimmock, A. (2013). What does student engagement mean to students? In E.
Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 59-75.
Thomas, L., (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a
time of change. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
Tschirhart, C. (2017). The survey that is not a survey: engaging staff and students through
meaningful feedback, presented at HEA Surveys Conference, Manchester, 2017.
Van der Velden, G. (2013). Staff perceptions of student engagement. In E. Dunne & D. Owen
(Eds.), The student engagement handbook. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 77-92.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-07

How to Cite

Tschirhart, C., & Pratt-Adams, S. D. (2019). Closing the loop: An evaluation of student-led module feedback at one UK higher education institution. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3554

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Research Articles

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).