Asking and Answering Questions: Partners, Peer Learning, and Participation

Auteurs-es

  • John Rivers Research School of Biology, Australian National University
  • Aaron B. Smith Research School of Biology, Australian National University
  • Denise Higgins Research School of Biology, Australian National University
  • Ruth Mills Science Teaching and Learning Centre, Australian National University
  • Alex Gerd Maier Research School of Biology, Australian National University
  • Susan Margaret Howitt Research School of Biology, Australian National University

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3072

Mots-clés :

peer learning, feedback, asking questions, active learning, science

Résumé

Science is about asking questions but not all science courses provide students with opportunities to practice this essential skill. We give students ownership of the processes of asking and answering questions to help them take greater responsibility for their own learning and to better understand the process of science with its inherent uncertainty. Peer learning activities throughout the course embed multidirectional feedback within and between students and instructors. Students are our partners in the design and evaluation of exam questions and we learn from them as they rise to the challenge of identifying important information and applying it. The lab program is supported by peer assisted learning in which peer mentors partner with instructors to generate activities addressing the use of evidence and experimental design. While not all students engage as partners, those who do value these experiences and demonstrate they can use scientific content creatively and critically.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

John Rivers, Research School of Biology, Australian National University

John Rivers first enjoyed the molecular genetics course as an undergraduate, subsequently helping to establish and run the course’s PAL sessions. He has remained engaged with the course, helping evaluate student feedback, whilst completing his PhD in Plant Sciences at the Research School of Biology, ANU.

Aaron B. Smith, Research School of Biology, Australian National University

Aaron Smith graduated from the Australian National University in 2016 with a Bachelor of Genetics specialising in Plant Sciences and will begin a PhD in 2017. He has been a PAL mentor in first and second year biology courses since 2014.

Denise Higgins, Research School of Biology, Australian National University

Denise Higgins is an educational developer with extensive experience in course and program development, curriculum review and design and approaches to student-centred learning and research-led education. She has managed and participated in several education research projects on high order thinking skills and reflective practice in STEM undergraduate contexts.

Ruth Mills, Science Teaching and Learning Centre, Australian National University

Ruth Mills was coordinator of the ANU Science Peer Assisted Learning Program from 2011 to 2014, while also studying for a PhD in physics education research.  

Alex Gerd Maier, Research School of Biology, Australian National University

Alex Maier is a molecular parasitologist and applies functional genetics approaches to dissect the malaria parasite. His educational interests lie in conveying the excitement, challenges and benefits of the scientific method and how best to communicate the intrinsic aspects of it. He co-convenes the molecular genetics course with Susan.

Susan Margaret Howitt, Research School of Biology, Australian National University

Susan Howitt is a biochemist with an interest in educational research. She is especially interested in research-led education and how students understand research and the nature of science.  She co-convenes the molecular genetics course with Alex.

Références

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712.

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195-208.

Crouch, C.H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977.

Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2015). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 1-15.

Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Hamer. (2008). The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australian Computing Education, Volume 78, 69-74.

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher-education

Healy, F.G., & Livingstone, K.D. (2010). Using student-generated UV-induced Escherichia coli mutants in a directed inquiry undergraduate genetics laboratory. Genetics, 186(1), 33-39.

Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83(6), 775-796.

Keenan, C. (2014). Mapping student-led peer learning in the UK. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/mapping-student-led-peer-learning-uk

Matthews, K. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1). Retrieved from https://journals.gre.ac.uk/index.php/raise/article/view/380/338

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.

Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122-124.

Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321-345.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From Cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135-147.
Volume 1, Issue 1, Spring 2017

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2017-05-08

Comment citer

Rivers, J., Smith, A. B., Higgins, D., Mills, R., Maier, A. G., & Howitt, S. M. (2017). Asking and Answering Questions: Partners, Peer Learning, and Participation. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3072

Numéro

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017)

Rubrique

Case Studies

Licence

(c) Tous droits réservés Author 2017

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).