Students as Partners in the Real World – A Whole-Institution Approach

Auteurs-es

  • Natasha Shaw Queensland University of Technology
  • Caroline Rueckert Queensland University of Technology
  • Judith Smith Queensland University of Technology
  • Jennifer Tredinnick Queensland University of Technology
  • Maddison Lee Queensland University of Technology

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3079

Mots-clés :

students as partners, student engagement, whole of institution approach

Résumé

Students as Partners (SaP) is an approach to student engagement that has gained much traction in recent years. Evidence shows that it adds value to the learning experience and provides opportunities for students to develop the capabilities needed in their future pathways. This paper documents one university’s approach to embedding partnerships in its institutional culture. The paper begins by contextualising the process in relation to wider institutional goals and outlines the three phases of implementation. This case study argues that to enable a whole-institution approach to SaP, it has been necessary to invest in strategies at a number of levels that enable partnership, from high-end policy and protocols to providing opportunities for staff and students to shape their own partnerships.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Natasha Shaw, Queensland University of Technology

Natasha Shaw is the Coordinator- Students as Partners at QUT. Her background is is community cultural development and education. She is particularly interested in pedagogies that facilitate transformational learning.

Caroline Rueckert, Queensland University of Technology

Caroline Rueckert is Director, Student Success at QUT. Prior to commencing at QUT, Caroline was Program Director for First Year Student Initiatives at the University of British Columbia in Canada. Her interests are in building partnerships to enhance employability, student learning, cross-cultural issues in higher education, and facilitating student resilience and well-being through coordinated approaches to learner support. 

Judith Smith, Queensland University of Technology

Judith Smith as Associate Director, Academic - Real World Learning at QUT is responsible for providing university-wide leadership to curriculum transformation and real world learning in strategy, policy, curriculum design and pedagogy. Judith is also a Board member of Australian Collaborative Education Network and chair of their Research Subcommittee.  

Jennifer Tredinnick, Queensland University of Technology

Jennifer Tredinnick is Coordinator- Volunteer Development and Management at QUT. Jennifer is experienced in supporting partnerships in both the UK and Australia in community, school and university contexts. Particularly, Jennifer is interested in the participatory and collaborative inquiry processes that underpin successful partnerships.

Maddison Lee, Queensland University of Technology

Maddison Lee is a 4th Year Law and Justice Student who  has recently joined the Student Success and Retention team to develop resources for QUTs SaP initiative. Maddi has previously worked in student engagement and mentoring and is passionate about developing a new culture that encourages students to take advantage of opportunities in shaping their own learning environment.

Références

Bell, A. (2016). Students as Co-Inquirers in Australian Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-10. Retrieved from http://tlijournal.com/tli/index.php/TLI/article/view/111

Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2016). Co-creating curriculum in higher education: promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28-40. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120734

Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279448454_A_model_of_active_student_participation_in_curriculum_design_exploring_desirability_and_possibility

Bridgstock, R. (2016). Future Capable. Retrieved from http://www.futurecapable.com/

Buckley, A. (2014). How radical is student engagement?(And what is it for?). Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 3(2), 1-23. Retrieved from http://research.shu.ac.uk/SEEJ/index.php/seej/article/view/95

Carey, P. (2016). The impact of institutional culture, policy and process on student engagement in university decision-making. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13603108.2016.1168754

Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: a threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186-198. doi:www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty: John Wiley & Sons.

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Retrieved from York: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/engagement-through partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher-education

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2011). Fostering student success in hard times. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 43(4), 13-19. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00091383.2011.585311

Luescher-Mamashela, T. M. (2013). Student representation in university decision making: good reasons, a new lens? Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1442-1456. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.625496

Naumann, F. L., Coulter, T., Brancato, T., Rueckert, C., Shaw, N., & Lane, M. (2016). Students as partners in curriculum design: Working with students to improve student engagement in group work. Manuscript in preparation.

QUT. (2017). QUT Real World Learning Vision. Retrieved from https://www.qut.edu.au/about/strategic-ambitions/real-world-learning-2020-vision

Seale, J., Gibson, S., Haynes, J., & Potter, A. (2015). Power and resistance: Reflections on the rhetoric and reality of using participatory methods to promote student voice and engagement in higher education.
Journal of further and Higher Education, 39(4), 534-552. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0309877X.2014.938264

Shaw, N., & Tredinnick, J. (2017). Students as Partners Guide Retrieved from https://qutvirtual4.qut.edu.au/group/staff-staging/teaching/rwl/students-as-partners

Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention and Success programme. Retrieved from http://www.phf.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/What-Works-report-final.pdf

Vuori, J. (2014). Student engagement: buzzword of fuzzword? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(5), 509-519. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1360080X.2014.936094
Volume 1, Issue 1, Spring 2017

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2017-05-08

Comment citer

Shaw, N., Rueckert, C., Smith, J., Tredinnick, J., & Lee, M. (2017). Students as Partners in the Real World – A Whole-Institution Approach. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3079

Numéro

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017)

Rubrique

Case Studies

Licence

(c) Tous droits réservés Authors 2017

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).