The Development of Contemporary Student Engagement Practices at the University of Winchester and Winchester Student Union, UK
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3082Mots-clés :
student engagement, partnership, students as partners, quality, student experienceRésumé
This case study explores practice in four areas of student engagement activity which were developed in partnership between the University of Winchester and Winchester Student Union. The development, motivations, stakeholders, and challenges of activities built around the principles of representation, change, feedback, and research are discussed. Relationships between practices will be explored in the context of a proposal for how discrete practices can complement one another to create a community of partnership. The case study focuses on four key initiatives: Student Academic Representatives, Student Fellows Scheme, Student-Led Teaching Awards, and the Winchester Research Apprenticeship Programme. The four key initiatives are contextualised with a discussion of an ongoing project that seeks to provide greater coherence to student engagement through an institution-wide movement towards embedding partnership.
Téléchargements
Références
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228.
Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felton, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Department of Business, Innovation, and Skills [BIS], (2016). Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility, and student choice (Policy Paper). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/higher-education-success-as-a-knowledge-economy-white-paper
Dunne, E. (2016). Design thinking: A framework for student engagement? A personal view. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 2(1).
El Hakim, Y., King, S., Lowe, T., & Sims, S. (2016). Evaluating partnership and impact in the first year of the Student Fellows Scheme. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 2(1).
FASTECH. (2016). Feedback and assessment for students with technology. Retrieved from http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/page/51251270/FASTECH%20Project
Gibbs, G (2014, May 1). Student engagement, the latest buzzword. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/student-engagement-the-latest-buzzword/2012947.article
Higher Education Academy (HEA). Student Led Teaching Awards. Retrieved from: http://www.studentledteachingawards.org.uk/
HEA. (2014). Framework for partnership in learning and teaching in higher education York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/students-partners-framework-action
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
Hill, J. & Walkington, H. (2016). Developing graduate attributes through participation in undergraduate research conferences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 222-237.
Kay, J., Dunne, E., & Hutchinson, J. (2010). Rethinking the values of higher education: Students as change agents? Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1193/
Kyvik, S., (2013). The academic researcher role: Enhancing expectations and improved performance. Higher Education, 65(4), 525-538.
Jenkins, A. & Healey, M. (2010). Undergraduate research and international initiatives to link teaching and research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 30(3), 36-42.
Klemenčič, M. (2012). Student representation in Western Europe: Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Higher Education, 2(1), 2-19.
Madriaga, M. & Morley, K. (2016). Awarding teaching excellence: “What is it supposed to achieve?” Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 166-174.
National Student Survey (NSS). (2016). Retrieved from http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/about.php
National Union of Students (NUS). (2012). A manifesto for partnership. Retrieved from http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/a-manifesto-for-partnership
Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). (2012). UK quality code for higher education. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency.
QAA. (2016). Higher Education Review: University of Winchester. Retrieved from: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/reviews-and-reports/provider?UKPRN=10003614#.WQIHJtL1AdU
Shaw, C. (2016, May). Student perceptions of “student engagement” at the University of Winchester. Paper presented at the Winchester Student Fellows Conference 2016, University of Winchester.
Sims, S., Lowe T., Barnes, G., & Hutber, L. (2014). The Student Fellows Scheme: A partnership between the University of Winchester and Winchester Student Union. Educational Developments, 15(3), 7-10.
Vuori, J. (2014). Student engagement: Buzzword or fuzzword? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(5), 509-519.
Wait, R. & Bols, A. (2015). Making student engagement a reality: Turning theory into practice (Report). Retrieved from the GuildHE website http://www.guildhe.ac.uk/blog/making-student-engagement-a-reality-turning-theory-into-practice/
Walkington, H. (2008). Geoverse: Piloting a national e-journal of undergraduate research in Geography. Planet, 20, 41-46.
Téléchargements
Fichiers supplémentaires
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Author 2017
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process - this applies to the submitted, accepted, and published versions of the manuscript. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).