Exploring the impact of The Students Assessing Teaching and Learning Program

Auteurs-es

  • Adriana Signorini University of California, Merced
  • Cathy Pohan

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3683

Mots-clés :

faculty-undergraduates partnerships, students as partners in assessment, logic model impact, program assessment

Résumé

The Students Assessing Teaching and Learning (SATAL) Program at the University of California, Merced offers assessment support for faculty and program leads while engaging diverse, cross-program undergraduates in students-as- partners experiences in a work setting. Grounded in the Students as Partners (SaP) principles of respect, responsibility, and reciprocity (Cook-Sather, Bovill, & Felten, 2014), our assessment of the SATAL program reveals benefits for both students and faculty acting as co-creators of teaching and learning. Using the SATAL program as an example, we offer readers a logic model to guide the development of student-faculty-staff partnerships and assess the impact of these programs in a more meaningful and consequential manner. We also provide lessons learned from our evolving SATAL program to support others interested in designing sustainable student assisted assessment partnerships.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2019). W.K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide. Retrieved on July 29, 2019 at https://www.aacu.org/node/5682
Clark, D. J., & Redmond, M. V. (1982). Small Group Instructional Diagnosis: Final Report (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 217954). Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED217954.pdf
Cook-Sather, A. (2009). Learning from the student’s perspective: A sourcebook for effective teaching. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten P. (2014) Engaging Students as Partners in learning and teaching. A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf
Hines, S. (2015). Setting the groundwork for quality faculty development evaluation: A five-step approach. Journal of Faculty Development, 29(1), 5-12.
Matthews, K. E. (2017) Five propositions for genuine Students as Partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, L.S., Matthews, K.E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1 (1).
Signorini, A. (2014) Involving undergraduates in assessment: Assisting peers to provide constructive feedback. Assessment Update, 26(6), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/au.30002
Sorenson, D. L. (2001). College teaching and student consultants: Collaborating about teaching and learning. In J. E. Miller, J. E. Groccia, & M. S. Miller (Eds.). Student-assisted teaching: A guide to faculty-student teamwork (pp. 179-183). Bolton, MA: Anker.
Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H., Gilbert, S, & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618-627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2019-05-07

Comment citer

Signorini, A., & Pohan, C. (2019). Exploring the impact of The Students Assessing Teaching and Learning Program. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3683

Numéro

Rubrique

Case Studies